Does internet use improve the public evaluation of government environmental governance (GEG) in China? An analysis using the Chinese Social Survey, 2013-2017

IF 3.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.11.001
Jinghuan Chen, Jason A. Jean, Yunliang Zhang, Yixi Lu
{"title":"Does internet use improve the public evaluation of government environmental governance (GEG) in China? An analysis using the Chinese Social Survey, 2013-2017","authors":"Jinghuan Chen,&nbsp;Jason A. Jean,&nbsp;Yunliang Zhang,&nbsp;Yixi Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on three datasets of the Chinese Social Survey (CSS) 2013, 2015, and 2017 and the National Statistical Yearbook, this study examined whether and in what ways using the Internet may or may not affect the public evaluation of government environmental governance (GEG). There are three main findings. First, Internet use has a negative influence on the public evaluation of GEG. Second, there has been an urban-rural difference in terms of Internet use; especially for the rural resident, increasing their use of the Internet significantly lowered their evaluation of GEG. Third, Internet use affects GEG mainly through political trust, whilst it tends to enhance people’s perception of environmental problems; however, it has little influence on their evaluation of GEG. This finding implies that public evaluation of GEG should be viewed as an important inter-subjective dimension of GEG; especially in the Internet era, it has become increasingly necessary for the government to not only continuously improve the quality of governance by dealing with actual/practical environmental issues, but also enhance its ability to react to the public opinions online effectively and appropriately.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45743,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment","volume":"20 4","pages":"Pages 307-315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426222000845/pdfft?md5=a423ab4dac094f00e3ec908db681a9d4&pid=1-s2.0-S2325426222000845-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426222000845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on three datasets of the Chinese Social Survey (CSS) 2013, 2015, and 2017 and the National Statistical Yearbook, this study examined whether and in what ways using the Internet may or may not affect the public evaluation of government environmental governance (GEG). There are three main findings. First, Internet use has a negative influence on the public evaluation of GEG. Second, there has been an urban-rural difference in terms of Internet use; especially for the rural resident, increasing their use of the Internet significantly lowered their evaluation of GEG. Third, Internet use affects GEG mainly through political trust, whilst it tends to enhance people’s perception of environmental problems; however, it has little influence on their evaluation of GEG. This finding implies that public evaluation of GEG should be viewed as an important inter-subjective dimension of GEG; especially in the Internet era, it has become increasingly necessary for the government to not only continuously improve the quality of governance by dealing with actual/practical environmental issues, but also enhance its ability to react to the public opinions online effectively and appropriately.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互联网的使用是否提高了公众对中国政府环境治理的评价?基于2013-2017年中国社会调查的分析
基于2013年、2015年和2017年中国社会调查(CSS)和《国家统计年鉴》的三个数据集,本研究考察了互联网的使用是否以及以何种方式影响政府环境治理(GEG)的公众评价。主要有三个发现。首先,互联网使用对政府服务的公众评价有负面影响。第二,在互联网使用方面存在城乡差异;特别是对于农村居民来说,增加互联网的使用显著降低了他们对GEG的评价。第三,互联网的使用主要通过政治信任来影响环境绩效,同时它往往会增强人们对环境问题的感知;然而,这对他们对GEG的评价影响不大。这一发现表明,公众对政府绩效的评价应被视为政府绩效的一个重要的主体间维度;特别是在互联网时代,政府不仅要通过处理实际环境问题不断提高治理质量,而且要增强有效、恰当地回应网络民意的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
791
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment (CJPRE) is a peer-reviewed international academic journal that publishes original research in the fields of economic, population, resource, and environment studies as they relate to sustainable development. The journal aims to address and evaluate theoretical frameworks, capability building initiatives, strategic goals, ethical values, empirical research, methodologies, and techniques in the field. CJPRE began publication in 1992 and is sponsored by the Chinese Society for Sustainable Development (CSSD), the Research Center for Sustainable Development of Shandong Province, the Administrative Center for China's Agenda 21 (ACCA21), and Shandong Normal University. The Chinese title of the journal was inscribed by the former Chinese leader, Mr. Deng Xiaoping. Initially focused on China's advances in sustainable development, CJPRE now also highlights global developments from both developed and developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Spatial network characteristics and drivers of carbon emission reduction capability in urban agglomerations: A case study of Shandong Province Sustainable reputation of lithium-ion battery supplier and its impact on transaction equilibrium in the electric vehicle supply chain Understanding carbon footprint: An evaluation criterion for achieving sustainable development Digital intelligence and synergy of pollution reduction and carbon reduction: “Dividend” or “gap”? Substitutability of urban sustainability assessment indicators: A semantic similarity analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1