Views: compositional reasoning for concurrent programs

Thomas Dinsdale-Young, L. Birkedal, Philippa Gardner, Matthew J. Parkinson, Hongseok Yang
{"title":"Views: compositional reasoning for concurrent programs","authors":"Thomas Dinsdale-Young, L. Birkedal, Philippa Gardner, Matthew J. Parkinson, Hongseok Yang","doi":"10.1145/2429069.2429104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compositional abstractions underly many reasoning principles for concurrent programs: the concurrent environment is abstracted in order to reason about a thread in isolation; and these abstractions are composed to reason about a program consisting of many threads. For instance, separation logic uses formulae that describe part of the state, abstracting the rest; when two threads use disjoint state, their specifications can be composed with the separating conjunction. Type systems abstract the state to the types of variables; threads may be composed when they agree on the types of shared variables.\n In this paper, we present the \"Concurrent Views Framework\", a metatheory of concurrent reasoning principles. The theory is parameterised by an abstraction of state with a notion of composition, which we call views. The metatheory is remarkably simple, but highly applicable: the rely-guarantee method, concurrent separation logic, concurrent abstract predicates, type systems for recursive references and for unique pointers, and even an adaptation of the Owicki-Gries method can all be seen as instances of the Concurrent Views Framework. Moreover, our metatheory proves each of these systems is sound without requiring induction on the operational semantics.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"184","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2429069.2429104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 184

Abstract

Compositional abstractions underly many reasoning principles for concurrent programs: the concurrent environment is abstracted in order to reason about a thread in isolation; and these abstractions are composed to reason about a program consisting of many threads. For instance, separation logic uses formulae that describe part of the state, abstracting the rest; when two threads use disjoint state, their specifications can be composed with the separating conjunction. Type systems abstract the state to the types of variables; threads may be composed when they agree on the types of shared variables. In this paper, we present the "Concurrent Views Framework", a metatheory of concurrent reasoning principles. The theory is parameterised by an abstraction of state with a notion of composition, which we call views. The metatheory is remarkably simple, but highly applicable: the rely-guarantee method, concurrent separation logic, concurrent abstract predicates, type systems for recursive references and for unique pointers, and even an adaptation of the Owicki-Gries method can all be seen as instances of the Concurrent Views Framework. Moreover, our metatheory proves each of these systems is sound without requiring induction on the operational semantics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视图:并发程序的组合推理
组合抽象是并发程序的许多推理原则的基础:并发环境被抽象,以便对线程进行孤立的推理;这些抽象是用来解释由多个线程组成的程序的。例如,分离逻辑使用描述部分状态的公式,抽象其余部分;当两个线程使用不连接状态时,它们的规范可以用分离连接组成。类型系统将状态抽象为变量的类型;当线程对共享变量的类型达成一致时,就可以组成线程。本文提出了并发推理原理的元理论“并发视图框架”。这个理论是通过一个抽象的状态来参数化的,这个抽象的状态有一个组合的概念,我们称之为视图。元理论非常简单,但非常适用:依赖保证方法、并发分离逻辑、并发抽象谓词、递归引用和唯一指针的类型系统,甚至是对Owicki-Gries方法的改编,都可以看作是并发视图框架的实例。此外,我们的元理论证明了这些系统中的每一个都是健全的,而不需要对操作语义进行归纳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: Verified systems Session details: Semantic models 2 Session details: Program analysis 3 Session details: Program analysis 1 Session details: Type system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1