Effect of intravenous tramadol, acetaminophen in attenuating pain on propofol injection: Comparison with lignocaine: A randomized, Double-blind, controlled study

S. Biswal, S. Moningi, G. Ramachandran
{"title":"Effect of intravenous tramadol, acetaminophen in attenuating pain on propofol injection: Comparison with lignocaine: A randomized, Double-blind, controlled study","authors":"S. Biswal, S. Moningi, G. Ramachandran","doi":"10.4103/2394-6954.173529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Distress and pain due to propofol injection is a very common finding. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy with lignocaine, tramadol, and acetaminophen pretreatment to alleviate the propofol pain. Materials and Methods: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II adults, scheduled for various elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia, were included in the study. They were randomly divided into three groups with 30 patients in each group. Group A received pretreatment with intravenous (IV) lignocaine, group B received IV tramadol, and group C received IV acetaminophen. One-fourth of the total calculated induction dose of propofol was administered over a period of 5 s. The patients were asked about the pain on injection. The intensity of pain was assessed using verbal rating score. A score of 0–3, which corresponded to no, mild, moderate, and severe pain was recorded. Categorical and continuous variables were compared between the groups using Chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, respectively. Post hoc analysis was performed using Bonferroni test. Verbal rating scale (VRS), an ordered categorical variable, was compared between the groups using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: All the three drugs reduced the incidence and intensity of pain on propofol injection but the order of efficacy in attenuation of pain on the propofol injection was lignocaine > tramadol = acetaminophen. Conclusion: Both tramadol and acetaminophen were clinically equivalent to lignocaine in their potency to decrease the incidence of propofol pain.","PeriodicalId":17751,"journal":{"name":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-6954.173529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives: Distress and pain due to propofol injection is a very common finding. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy with lignocaine, tramadol, and acetaminophen pretreatment to alleviate the propofol pain. Materials and Methods: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II adults, scheduled for various elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia, were included in the study. They were randomly divided into three groups with 30 patients in each group. Group A received pretreatment with intravenous (IV) lignocaine, group B received IV tramadol, and group C received IV acetaminophen. One-fourth of the total calculated induction dose of propofol was administered over a period of 5 s. The patients were asked about the pain on injection. The intensity of pain was assessed using verbal rating score. A score of 0–3, which corresponded to no, mild, moderate, and severe pain was recorded. Categorical and continuous variables were compared between the groups using Chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, respectively. Post hoc analysis was performed using Bonferroni test. Verbal rating scale (VRS), an ordered categorical variable, was compared between the groups using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: All the three drugs reduced the incidence and intensity of pain on propofol injection but the order of efficacy in attenuation of pain on the propofol injection was lignocaine > tramadol = acetaminophen. Conclusion: Both tramadol and acetaminophen were clinically equivalent to lignocaine in their potency to decrease the incidence of propofol pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉曲马多、对乙酰氨基酚对异丙酚注射疼痛的缓解作用:与利多卡因的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照研究
目的:异丙酚注射引起的窘迫和疼痛是非常常见的发现。本研究的目的是评估利多卡因、曲马多和对乙酰氨基酚预处理对异丙酚疼痛的缓解效果。材料和方法:90名美国麻醉学学会(ASA) I和II级成人,在全身麻醉下计划进行各种选择性手术,纳入研究。随机分为三组,每组30例。A组静脉滴注利多卡因预处理,B组静脉滴注曲马多,C组静脉滴注对乙酰氨基酚。异丙酚总诱导剂量的四分之一在5 s的时间内给予。患者被问及注射时的疼痛。疼痛强度采用言语评分法评定。0-3分,分别代表无疼痛、轻度疼痛、中度疼痛和重度疼痛。组间分类变量和连续变量的比较分别采用卡方检验和方差分析(ANOVA)检验。采用Bonferroni检验进行事后分析。言语评定量表(VRS)为有序分类变量,组间比较采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。曲马多=对乙酰氨基酚。结论:曲马多和对乙酰氨基酚在降低异丙酚疼痛发生率方面的效价与利多卡因相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A bizarre scenario during lung isolation due to interchanged double-lumen tube connectors Anesthetic management of a case of cleidocranial dysplasia Flexible intubation videoscope-guided replacement of tracheostomy tube in a carcinoma larynx patient with extensive subglottic involvement Comparative study of hemodynamic changes using proseal laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask airway or laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery A patient with Cushing's disease for pituitary tumor resection: Anesthetic challenges and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1