Defoliation impacts on Festuca campestris (Rydb.) plants exposed to wildfire

A. D. Bogen, E. Bork, W. Willms
{"title":"Defoliation impacts on Festuca campestris (Rydb.) plants exposed to wildfire","authors":"A. D. Bogen, E. Bork, W. Willms","doi":"10.2307/4004042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wildfires commonly occur in the Fescue Prairie of Alberta, but little information exists to provide a basis for making grazing recommendations after burning. A wildfire in April 1999 provided an opportunity to study the effect of season and intensity of post-burn defoliation on foothills rough fescue (F. campestris Rydb.) in southwestern Alberta. A 3 (date of defoliation) x 2 (defoliation intensity) factorial experiment with 10 replicates (plants) was established in both a burned and a non-burned grassland and analyzed as a nested design. Plants were defoliated once during active vegetative growth (17 May), inflorescence development (2 July), or dormancy (30 September), at either 5 or 15-cm clipped stubble heights in the first growing season after fire. Burning increased tiller numbers by 54% compared to non-burned plants but reduced plant ANPP by 51% in the second growing season. While a single defoliation of burned plants, particularly early in the year, had little effect on growth, delaying defoliation into July decreased tillers 1 year later. Increasing defoliation intensity had the greatest impact on non-burned plants, reducing plant height (15%) as well as tiller (21%) and plant (32%) ANPP in the second year. May defoliation reduced etiolated growth 1 year later regardless of burn treatment. A single grazing event after wildfire does not necessarily appear to detrimentally affect rough fescue; however, the low herbage available immediately after fire may not justify the increased risk to the plant with subsequent grazing. DOI:10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i4_bogen","PeriodicalId":16918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Range Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Range Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4004042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Wildfires commonly occur in the Fescue Prairie of Alberta, but little information exists to provide a basis for making grazing recommendations after burning. A wildfire in April 1999 provided an opportunity to study the effect of season and intensity of post-burn defoliation on foothills rough fescue (F. campestris Rydb.) in southwestern Alberta. A 3 (date of defoliation) x 2 (defoliation intensity) factorial experiment with 10 replicates (plants) was established in both a burned and a non-burned grassland and analyzed as a nested design. Plants were defoliated once during active vegetative growth (17 May), inflorescence development (2 July), or dormancy (30 September), at either 5 or 15-cm clipped stubble heights in the first growing season after fire. Burning increased tiller numbers by 54% compared to non-burned plants but reduced plant ANPP by 51% in the second growing season. While a single defoliation of burned plants, particularly early in the year, had little effect on growth, delaying defoliation into July decreased tillers 1 year later. Increasing defoliation intensity had the greatest impact on non-burned plants, reducing plant height (15%) as well as tiller (21%) and plant (32%) ANPP in the second year. May defoliation reduced etiolated growth 1 year later regardless of burn treatment. A single grazing event after wildfire does not necessarily appear to detrimentally affect rough fescue; however, the low herbage available immediately after fire may not justify the increased risk to the plant with subsequent grazing. DOI:10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i4_bogen
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野火对羊茅落叶的影响
野火通常发生在阿尔伯塔省的羊茅草原,但很少有信息可以为燃烧后的放牧建议提供依据。1999年4月的一场野火为研究艾伯塔省西南部丘陵粗糙羊茅(F. campestris Rydb.)燃烧后落叶的季节和强度的影响提供了机会。建立了一个3(落叶日期)× 2(落叶强度)的因子试验,在烧毁和未烧毁的草地上进行10个重复(植物),并进行巢式设计分析。在火灾后的第一个生长季节,植物在营养生长期(5月17日)、花序发育(7月2日)或休眠期(9月30日)在修剪后5或15厘米的残茬高度上落叶一次。与未燃烧植株相比,燃烧植株的分蘖数增加了54%,但在第二个生长季节使植株的ANPP减少了51%。而焚烧植株的单次落叶,特别是在年初,对生长影响不大,延迟到7月的落叶减少了1年后的分蘖数。增加落叶强度对未烧苗的影响最大,第二年株高降低15%,分蘖降低21%,植株ANPP降低32%。不论烧伤治疗与否,1年后落叶可减少黄化生长。野火后的一次放牧并不一定会对粗糙的羊茅产生不利影响;然而,火灾后立即获得的牧草较少,可能不能证明随后放牧对植物增加的风险是合理的。DOI: 10.2458 / azu_jrm_v56i4_bogen
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Grasses and Grassland Farming The Study of Plant Communities: An Introduction to Plant Ecology Research observation: Daily movement patterns of hill climbing and bottom dwelling cowsfull access The rangelands of the Sahel. Estimating Cattle Gains from Consumption of Digestible Forage on Ponderosa Pine Range (La Estimacion de Ganancias del Ganado Bovino por el Consumo de Forraje Digestible)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1