Radicalism in the old regime: the challenge of parliamentary sovereignty in Sweden, 1769–70

Q2 Arts and Humanities Parliaments, Estates and Representation Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/02606755.2022.2133371
Magnus Linnarsson
{"title":"Radicalism in the old regime: the challenge of parliamentary sovereignty in Sweden, 1769–70","authors":"Magnus Linnarsson","doi":"10.1080/02606755.2022.2133371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyses how notions of parliamentary sovereignty, were posited against universal principles of the separation of powers, using the debate in the Swedish Diet (Riksdag) in 1769 on the Act of Security as an example. The act was launched as an attack on the prevailing parliamentary sovereignty. Since the mid-eighteenth century, the Riksdag had established itself as the sovereign power in Swedish politics and its critics argued for the need of personal and material security. The analysis shows how egalitarian ideas and democratic elements became part of the political discourse. This article argues that this debate was decisive for the coming end of the Swedish Age of Liberty (1719–72), and that it exemplifies a political conflict between radicals and conservatives. It also shows how the debate was a battle for alternative paths of state formation. Either a strong state, dominated by elite groups with capacity to control policy, or a more participatory government, with traces of early democratization. The analysis draws on two key analytical concepts: the ‘rule of law' and ‘political participation’. In the debate, the rule of law became an instrument for limiting political participation when the aristocracy tried to strengthen its powers.","PeriodicalId":53586,"journal":{"name":"Parliaments, Estates and Representation","volume":"33 1","pages":"233 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parliaments, Estates and Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2022.2133371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyses how notions of parliamentary sovereignty, were posited against universal principles of the separation of powers, using the debate in the Swedish Diet (Riksdag) in 1769 on the Act of Security as an example. The act was launched as an attack on the prevailing parliamentary sovereignty. Since the mid-eighteenth century, the Riksdag had established itself as the sovereign power in Swedish politics and its critics argued for the need of personal and material security. The analysis shows how egalitarian ideas and democratic elements became part of the political discourse. This article argues that this debate was decisive for the coming end of the Swedish Age of Liberty (1719–72), and that it exemplifies a political conflict between radicals and conservatives. It also shows how the debate was a battle for alternative paths of state formation. Either a strong state, dominated by elite groups with capacity to control policy, or a more participatory government, with traces of early democratization. The analysis draws on two key analytical concepts: the ‘rule of law' and ‘political participation’. In the debate, the rule of law became an instrument for limiting political participation when the aristocracy tried to strengthen its powers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旧政权中的激进主义:对瑞典议会主权的挑战,1769 - 1770
本文以1769年瑞典议会(Riksdag)关于《安全法》的辩论为例,分析了议会主权的概念是如何与权力分立的普遍原则相违背的。该法案是作为对现行议会主权的攻击而发起的。自18世纪中期以来,瑞典国会已经确立了自己在瑞典政治中的最高权力,其批评者认为需要个人和物质安全。分析显示了平等主义思想和民主因素如何成为政治话语的一部分。本文认为,这场辩论对瑞典自由时代(1719-72)的结束起了决定性作用,它体现了激进派和保守派之间的政治冲突。它还表明,这场辩论是一场为国家形成的不同路径而进行的斗争。要么是一个由有能力控制政策的精英群体主导的强大国家,要么是一个具有早期民主化痕迹的更具参与性的政府。该分析借鉴了两个关键的分析概念:“法治”和“政治参与”。在辩论中,当贵族试图加强其权力时,法治成为限制政治参与的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parliaments, Estates and Representation
Parliaments, Estates and Representation Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Interpreting multilateral diplomacy in the Indonesian Parliament’s debates on climate crisis and sustainability Red star over the Baltic: the sovietisation of representative assemblies in Poland's ‘Recovered Territories’ via the ‘three times “Yes”’ referendum of 1946 Importable or exceptional? Swiss direct-democratic instruments in the French and German Parliaments, 2000–19 The Portuguese customary electoral constitution: the election of representatives to the ancient cortes The German Parliament and the political crisis of 1917–18: the role of the Intergroup Commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1