Equivalent uniform dose and normal tissue complication probability of acute esophagitis in head-and-neck radiotherapy: Sensitivity to dose calculation accuracy
M. Mosleh-Shirazi, A. Sheikholeslami, E. Fathipour, M. Mohammadianpanah, M. Ansari, S. Karbasi, S. H. Hamedi, N. Khanjani, M. Sasani, P. Jafari, R. Fardid
{"title":"Equivalent uniform dose and normal tissue complication probability of acute esophagitis in head-and-neck radiotherapy: Sensitivity to dose calculation accuracy","authors":"M. Mosleh-Shirazi, A. Sheikholeslami, E. Fathipour, M. Mohammadianpanah, M. Ansari, S. Karbasi, S. H. Hamedi, N. Khanjani, M. Sasani, P. Jafari, R. Fardid","doi":"10.52547/ijrr.20.2.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : To quantify the influence of photon dose - calculation algorithm selection on the cervical esophagus (CE) dose indices and the derived equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal - tissue complication probability (NTCP) for acute esophagitis in patients with head - and - neck cancer (HNC). Materials and Methods : The Fast Photon Effective Path (FPEP) and Collapsed - Cone Convolution Superposition (CCCS) algorithms on the Prowess Panther treatment planning system were compared for 30 patients (six tumor sites). The Lyman - Kutcher - Burmann (LKB) model was used to calculate the EUDs and NTCPs. Results : On average, the more simplistic FPEP algorithm overestimated the mean dose to CE planning organ - at - risk volumes (PRVs) by 2.0% (p = 0.003). The average absolute difference in mean dose was 2.7% and the maximum difference was 9.3%. The V 5Gy , V 10Gy , V 15Gy , V 20Gy , V 25Gy and V 30Gy values were significantly higher with FPEP, while the point - dose and D 2cc hot spots were similar. In turn, the dose differences led to an underestimation of the LKB - model prediction of the EUD by 1.4% (p = 0.297). The mean absolute difference in EUD was 4.5% and the maximum difference was 15.3%. In the 14 - 50 Gy mean dose range, the resulting NTCPs with FPEP were lower on average by 2.6% than CCCS (p = 0.041). Conclusions : In the group of HNC patients considered in this study, the EUD and NTCP for acute esophagitis showed to be moderately sensitive to the choice of dose - calculation algorithm. Despite an overestimated mean dose by the simpler algorithm, the NTCP underestimation, which can be large in some patients, is of clinical concern.","PeriodicalId":48815,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Research","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ijrr.20.2.28","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background : To quantify the influence of photon dose - calculation algorithm selection on the cervical esophagus (CE) dose indices and the derived equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal - tissue complication probability (NTCP) for acute esophagitis in patients with head - and - neck cancer (HNC). Materials and Methods : The Fast Photon Effective Path (FPEP) and Collapsed - Cone Convolution Superposition (CCCS) algorithms on the Prowess Panther treatment planning system were compared for 30 patients (six tumor sites). The Lyman - Kutcher - Burmann (LKB) model was used to calculate the EUDs and NTCPs. Results : On average, the more simplistic FPEP algorithm overestimated the mean dose to CE planning organ - at - risk volumes (PRVs) by 2.0% (p = 0.003). The average absolute difference in mean dose was 2.7% and the maximum difference was 9.3%. The V 5Gy , V 10Gy , V 15Gy , V 20Gy , V 25Gy and V 30Gy values were significantly higher with FPEP, while the point - dose and D 2cc hot spots were similar. In turn, the dose differences led to an underestimation of the LKB - model prediction of the EUD by 1.4% (p = 0.297). The mean absolute difference in EUD was 4.5% and the maximum difference was 15.3%. In the 14 - 50 Gy mean dose range, the resulting NTCPs with FPEP were lower on average by 2.6% than CCCS (p = 0.041). Conclusions : In the group of HNC patients considered in this study, the EUD and NTCP for acute esophagitis showed to be moderately sensitive to the choice of dose - calculation algorithm. Despite an overestimated mean dose by the simpler algorithm, the NTCP underestimation, which can be large in some patients, is of clinical concern.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Research (IJRR) publishes original scientific research and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, and Medical and health physics. The clinical studies submitted for publication include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, especially chemoradiotherapy approaches, and relevant innovations in hyperthermia, brachytherapy, high LET irradiation, nuclear medicine, dosimetry, tumor imaging, radiation treatment planning, radiosensitizers, and radioprotectors. All manuscripts must pass stringent peer-review and only papers that are rated of high scientific quality are accepted.