Role of laboratory investigations to assess maternal and perinatal outcome in hypertensive mothers

D. Preethi, L. Rai, M. Nambiar, Pratap Kumar, M. Pai, S. Amin
{"title":"Role of laboratory investigations to assess maternal and perinatal outcome in hypertensive mothers","authors":"D. Preethi, L. Rai, M. Nambiar, Pratap Kumar, M. Pai, S. Amin","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of routinely done laboratory parameters in women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Materials and methods: Hypertensive pregnant women were divided into two groups based on perinatal outcome as those with and without poor perinatal outcome. They were analyzed with various laboratory tests done at the time of diagnosis: Hematological parameters, such as hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, total leukocyte count, and differential count; renal parameters, such as serum urea, creatinine, and uric acid; liver function tests; and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Coagulation parameters, such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and international normalized ratio were compared between the two groups. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation; α level of p < 0.05 was set as statistically significant. Results: Among the various hematological parameters, platelet count showed statistically significant differences between hypertensives with and without perinatal mortality or morbidity (p = 0.029, p = 0.029 respectively). All renal parameters showed statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.005). Serum aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.034) among the liver parameters and serum LDH (p = 0.024) showed statistically significant differences between the two groups. Coagulation parameters were abnormal among patients with thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: Blood pressure alone is not sufficient in monitoring women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Laboratory parameters that are cost-effective and routinely done in most laboratories are significant in assessing the severity of maternal disease and the perinatal outcome. It can hence, be used to monitor hypertensive women in pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":38998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infertility and Fetal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10016-1142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of routinely done laboratory parameters in women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Materials and methods: Hypertensive pregnant women were divided into two groups based on perinatal outcome as those with and without poor perinatal outcome. They were analyzed with various laboratory tests done at the time of diagnosis: Hematological parameters, such as hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, total leukocyte count, and differential count; renal parameters, such as serum urea, creatinine, and uric acid; liver function tests; and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Coagulation parameters, such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and international normalized ratio were compared between the two groups. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation; α level of p < 0.05 was set as statistically significant. Results: Among the various hematological parameters, platelet count showed statistically significant differences between hypertensives with and without perinatal mortality or morbidity (p = 0.029, p = 0.029 respectively). All renal parameters showed statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.005). Serum aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.034) among the liver parameters and serum LDH (p = 0.024) showed statistically significant differences between the two groups. Coagulation parameters were abnormal among patients with thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: Blood pressure alone is not sufficient in monitoring women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Laboratory parameters that are cost-effective and routinely done in most laboratories are significant in assessing the severity of maternal disease and the perinatal outcome. It can hence, be used to monitor hypertensive women in pregnancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验室调查的作用,以评估产妇和围产期结局在高血压母亲
简介:本研究的目的是评估妊娠期高血压疾病妇女常规实验室参数的相关性。材料与方法:根据围产期结局将高血压孕妇分为围产期结局不良组和围产期结局不佳组。他们在诊断时进行了各种实验室检查:血液学参数,如血红蛋白、红细胞压积、血小板计数、白细胞总数和差异计数;肾脏参数,如血清尿素、肌酐和尿酸;肝功能检查;血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)。比较两组凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间、国际标准化比值等凝血参数。数据以均数±标准差表示;α水平p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:在各项血液学指标中,血小板计数在有无围生期死亡或发病的高血压患者之间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.029, p = 0.029)。各肾脏参数差异均有统计学意义(p≤0.005)。两组间血清天冬氨酸转氨酶(p = 0.034)及血清LDH (p = 0.024)差异均有统计学意义。血小板减少症患者凝血指标异常。结论:单靠血压监测妊娠期高血压疾病是不够的。成本效益高且在大多数实验室例行进行的实验室参数对于评估孕产妇疾病的严重程度和围产期结果具有重要意义。因此,它可以用于监测妊娠期高血压妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound Detection of Fetal Structural Anomalies during First Trimester Nuchal Translucency Scan in Conjunction with Traditional 18–22 Weeks Anomaly Scan Impact of Prematuration Culture on Zygote Morphology In Vitro Maturation: An Early Clue to Embryo Competence Fetal Jacob Syndrome (47XYY): An Uncommon Association of Fetal Pulmonary Atresia with Ventricular Septal Defect Occurrence of Insulin Resistance with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss of Unknown Etiology in North Indian Hospital-based Women Population: A Pilot Study POSEIDONE 1 and 2: Probable Causes and Proposed Treatment Strategies? An Evidence-based Update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1