J. Nie, Zhizhong Chen, F. Jiao, Yifan Chen, J. Zhan, Yiyong Chen, Z. Pan, X. Kang, Yongzhi Wang, Qi Wang, Weimin Dang, W. Dong, Shuzhe Zhou, Xin Yu, Yuzhen Tong, Guoyi Zhang, B. Shen
{"title":"Utilization of far-red LED to minimize blue light hazard for dynamic semiconductor lighting","authors":"J. Nie, Zhizhong Chen, F. Jiao, Yifan Chen, J. Zhan, Yiyong Chen, Z. Pan, X. Kang, Yongzhi Wang, Qi Wang, Weimin Dang, W. Dong, Shuzhe Zhou, Xin Yu, Yuzhen Tong, Guoyi Zhang, B. Shen","doi":"10.1080/15502724.2022.2043163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The blue light hazard (BLH) and luminous efficacy of a source ( ) are associated with the photobiological safety and energy saving of light-emitting diodes (LEDs), respectively. In this study, we used genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the BLH, , and color rendering parameters of five-chip hybrid white LEDs. Based on the optimal results, we used five-chip LEDs to obtain the hybrid white light. Their peak wavelengths were 461.5 (blue), 523.9 (green), 588.2 (orange), 643.3 (red), and 694.2 nm (far-red), respectively. In practice, the blue light hazard efficiency of radiation (BLHER) of the hybrid white light was less than 0.10, which was lower than half of the most common light sources. The ranged from 51.6 to 115.6 lm/W at correlated color temperature (CCT) from 2700 to 6500 K. On average, the CIE general color rendering index (Ra), CIE special color rendering index for the ninth deep red test sample (R9), ANSI/IES TM-30 color fidelity index (Rf), and color gamut index (Rg) of hybrid white light were 91.3, 87.8, 83.3, and 96.7, respectively. The melanopic efficacy of luminous radiation ( ) was tunable in the range of 0.60 to 1.35 mW/lm. These results demonstrated that we used far-red LEDs to fabricate white light with low BLH and relatively high efficiency.","PeriodicalId":49911,"journal":{"name":"Leukos","volume":"138 1","pages":"53 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukos","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2022.2043163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
ABSTRACT The blue light hazard (BLH) and luminous efficacy of a source ( ) are associated with the photobiological safety and energy saving of light-emitting diodes (LEDs), respectively. In this study, we used genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the BLH, , and color rendering parameters of five-chip hybrid white LEDs. Based on the optimal results, we used five-chip LEDs to obtain the hybrid white light. Their peak wavelengths were 461.5 (blue), 523.9 (green), 588.2 (orange), 643.3 (red), and 694.2 nm (far-red), respectively. In practice, the blue light hazard efficiency of radiation (BLHER) of the hybrid white light was less than 0.10, which was lower than half of the most common light sources. The ranged from 51.6 to 115.6 lm/W at correlated color temperature (CCT) from 2700 to 6500 K. On average, the CIE general color rendering index (Ra), CIE special color rendering index for the ninth deep red test sample (R9), ANSI/IES TM-30 color fidelity index (Rf), and color gamut index (Rg) of hybrid white light were 91.3, 87.8, 83.3, and 96.7, respectively. The melanopic efficacy of luminous radiation ( ) was tunable in the range of 0.60 to 1.35 mW/lm. These results demonstrated that we used far-red LEDs to fabricate white light with low BLH and relatively high efficiency.
期刊介绍:
The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .