Ah!

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1086/717196
Rachel Eisendrath
{"title":"Ah!","authors":"Rachel Eisendrath","doi":"10.1086/717196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ah is a peculiar word—or, rather, a peculiar nonword word. It is an exhalation, a flow of air that seems to vibrate slightly in the back of the throat. It is imitative of a sigh or maybe a soft gasp. It is nonreferential, not entirely unlike an onomatopoeia. Although, oddly, onomatopoeic words are not the same in all languages (in Norwegian, vrinsk is the sound that a horse makes, and voff the sound that a dog makes), forms of ah exist in many other languages: Anglo-Norman, Old French, Middle French, Latin, Old Occitan, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian. But unlike other onomatopoeic words (unlike, for example, quack, the sound in English that a duck makes), ah is the sound that, in a lyric poem, the narrator or speaker makes. What interests me about the word is the way that it has been used in some Renaissance lyric poems to mark the narrator’s sudden encounter with the external world and, in so doing, to interrupt an internalized and seemingly sealed-off discourse. While one might assume that such an encounter would threaten the apparent autonomy of themind’s internal world, this encounter may actually undergird the mind’s autonomy—or at least its claim to autonomy. To start to make sense of that rather abstract assertion, consider the following example, Shakespeare’s Sonnet 34 (where the ah appears in the final couplet):","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ah is a peculiar word—or, rather, a peculiar nonword word. It is an exhalation, a flow of air that seems to vibrate slightly in the back of the throat. It is imitative of a sigh or maybe a soft gasp. It is nonreferential, not entirely unlike an onomatopoeia. Although, oddly, onomatopoeic words are not the same in all languages (in Norwegian, vrinsk is the sound that a horse makes, and voff the sound that a dog makes), forms of ah exist in many other languages: Anglo-Norman, Old French, Middle French, Latin, Old Occitan, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian. But unlike other onomatopoeic words (unlike, for example, quack, the sound in English that a duck makes), ah is the sound that, in a lyric poem, the narrator or speaker makes. What interests me about the word is the way that it has been used in some Renaissance lyric poems to mark the narrator’s sudden encounter with the external world and, in so doing, to interrupt an internalized and seemingly sealed-off discourse. While one might assume that such an encounter would threaten the apparent autonomy of themind’s internal world, this encounter may actually undergird the mind’s autonomy—or at least its claim to autonomy. To start to make sense of that rather abstract assertion, consider the following example, Shakespeare’s Sonnet 34 (where the ah appears in the final couplet):
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ah是一个特殊的词,或者更确切地说,是一个特殊的非词词。这是一种呼气,一股气流似乎在喉咙后部轻微振动。它模仿的是一声叹息,或者是轻轻的喘息。它是非指涉性的,与拟声词并不完全不同。虽然,奇怪的是,拟声词在所有语言中并不相同(在挪威语中,vrinsk是马发出的声音,而voff是狗发出的声音),但在许多其他语言中都存在ah的形式:盎格鲁-诺曼语、古法语、中古法语、拉丁语、古奥西顿语、加泰罗尼亚语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语、意大利语。但与其他拟声词不同(例如,不像英语中鸭子发出的嘎嘎声),ah是抒情诗中叙述者或说话者发出的声音。我对这个词感兴趣的是它在一些文艺复兴时期的抒情诗中被用来标记叙述者与外部世界的突然接触,这样做,打断了一个内化的,看似封闭的话语。虽然有人可能会认为这样的相遇会威胁到大脑内部世界的明显自主性,但这种相遇实际上可能会巩固大脑的自主性——或者至少是它声称的自主性。为了开始理解这个相当抽象的断言,考虑一下下面的例子,莎士比亚的十四行诗第34首(ah出现在最后一对诗中):
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter “Soveraigne place”: Spenser with Henri Lefebvre Thinking through Symbionts: Spenser with Donna Haraway On Dissonance and Late Style: Spenser with Theodor W. Adorno In the Person of the Author: A Response to “Imagined Companions”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1