YaskoT 7OKM EL3aSKaR

IF 2.1 Q1 LINGUISTICS Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal Pub Date : 2019-03-07 DOI:10.1075/LL.18003.RAI
Michael Raish
{"title":"YaskoT 7OKM EL3aSKaR","authors":"Michael Raish","doi":"10.1075/LL.18003.RAI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents an analysis of the linguistic contents of political protest signs that were erected at sit-in sites in\n Cairo and Alexandria, Egypt, during the summer of 2011. Sign authors employed a wide variety of linguistic codes and symbolic visual\n resources to subvert state authority, urge fellow citizens to action, and advocate a number of other political goals. Drawing on the\n methodology of Linguistic Landscape (LL) studies, the current effort investigates the relationship between linguistic code and factors such\n as sign location, medium, length, and thematic content. Multinomial logistic regression analysis reveals a significant relationship between\n sign code and medium, for example, as handwritten signs show more linguistic diversity than printed signs. Qualitative analysis focuses on\n sign authors, use of the symbolic and semiotic resources associated with these codes. This study of the ephemeral, transitory LL of Egyptian\n sit-in sites demonstrates the many and varied ways in which citizen sign authors manipulate concepts of formality, code choice, and imagery\n to encourage audiences to take up their messages as resources for social action in their own worlds.","PeriodicalId":53129,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LL.18003.RAI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the linguistic contents of political protest signs that were erected at sit-in sites in Cairo and Alexandria, Egypt, during the summer of 2011. Sign authors employed a wide variety of linguistic codes and symbolic visual resources to subvert state authority, urge fellow citizens to action, and advocate a number of other political goals. Drawing on the methodology of Linguistic Landscape (LL) studies, the current effort investigates the relationship between linguistic code and factors such as sign location, medium, length, and thematic content. Multinomial logistic regression analysis reveals a significant relationship between sign code and medium, for example, as handwritten signs show more linguistic diversity than printed signs. Qualitative analysis focuses on sign authors, use of the symbolic and semiotic resources associated with these codes. This study of the ephemeral, transitory LL of Egyptian sit-in sites demonstrates the many and varied ways in which citizen sign authors manipulate concepts of formality, code choice, and imagery to encourage audiences to take up their messages as resources for social action in their own worlds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文分析了2011年夏天在埃及开罗和亚历山大静坐场所竖立的政治抗议标语的语言内容。标志作者使用各种语言代码和象征性视觉资源来颠覆国家权威,敦促同胞采取行动,并倡导许多其他政治目标。利用语言学景观(LL)研究的方法,目前的努力调查了语言代码与符号位置、媒介、长度和主题内容等因素之间的关系。多项逻辑回归分析揭示了符号代码与媒介之间的显著关系,例如,手写符号比印刷符号表现出更多的语言多样性。定性分析侧重于符号作者,使用与这些代码相关的符号和符号学资源。这项对埃及静坐场所短暂的研究展示了公民标志作者操纵形式、代码选择和图像概念的多种方式,以鼓励观众接受他们的信息,作为他们自己世界中社会行动的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Semiotic landscape in a green capital Review of Kosatica (2022): The Burden of Traumascapes: Discourses of remembering in Bosnia-Herzegovina and beyond Exploring incongruity and humour in Linguistic Landscapes in Ghana The semiotics of Kosovo’s streetscapes The Linguistic Landscape of the war
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1