Does Exposure to Diverse Perspectives Mitigate Biases in Crowdwork? An Explorative Study

Xiaoni Duan, Chien-Ju Ho, Ming Yin
{"title":"Does Exposure to Diverse Perspectives Mitigate Biases in Crowdwork? An Explorative Study","authors":"Xiaoni Duan, Chien-Ju Ho, Ming Yin","doi":"10.1609/hcomp.v8i1.7474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earlier research has shown the promise of enabling worker interactions in crowdwork to mitigate worker biases and improve the quality of crowdwork. In this study, we focus on one characteristic of the interacting workers that may influence the effectiveness of worker interactions in enhancing crowdwork—the diversity of perspectives that the interacting workers bring together—and we explore whether and how interactions between a set of workers holding different perspectives can help mitigate biases in crowdwork. Through two sets of randomized experiments, we find that whether interactions between workers with different perspectives can help mitigate biases in crowdwork depends on task properties. We also find no conclusive evidence in our experimental settings suggesting that interactions among workers with diverse perspectives reduce biases in crowdwork to a larger extent compared to interactions among workers with similar perspectives.","PeriodicalId":87339,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v8i1.7474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Earlier research has shown the promise of enabling worker interactions in crowdwork to mitigate worker biases and improve the quality of crowdwork. In this study, we focus on one characteristic of the interacting workers that may influence the effectiveness of worker interactions in enhancing crowdwork—the diversity of perspectives that the interacting workers bring together—and we explore whether and how interactions between a set of workers holding different perspectives can help mitigate biases in crowdwork. Through two sets of randomized experiments, we find that whether interactions between workers with different perspectives can help mitigate biases in crowdwork depends on task properties. We also find no conclusive evidence in our experimental settings suggesting that interactions among workers with diverse perspectives reduce biases in crowdwork to a larger extent compared to interactions among workers with similar perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接触不同视角是否能减轻众筹中的偏见?探索性研究
早期的研究表明,让员工在众包中互动,可以减轻员工的偏见,提高众包的质量。在本研究中,我们关注互动员工的一个特征,这个特征可能会影响员工互动在增强众包工作中的有效性——互动员工汇集的观点的多样性——我们探讨了一组持有不同观点的员工之间的互动是否以及如何有助于减轻众包工作中的偏见。通过两组随机实验,我们发现具有不同观点的员工之间的互动是否有助于减轻众包中的偏见取决于任务属性。在我们的实验设置中,我们也没有发现确凿的证据表明,与具有相似观点的工人之间的互动相比,具有不同观点的工人之间的互动在更大程度上减少了众包中的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collection Crowdsourced Clustering via Active Querying: Practical Algorithm with Theoretical Guarantees BackTrace: A Human-AI Collaborative Approach to Discovering Studio Backdrops in Historical Photographs Confidence Contours: Uncertainty-Aware Annotation for Medical Semantic Segmentation Humans Forgo Reward to Instill Fairness into AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1