Сost of the Biologacal Therapy for Severe Brochcial Asthma Treatment at Inpatient and Day Care Setting

S. Nedogoda, A. Salasyuk, I. Barykina, V. O. Smirnova, M. Frolov
{"title":"Сost of the Biologacal Therapy for Severe Brochcial Asthma Treatment at Inpatient and Day Care Setting","authors":"S. Nedogoda, A. Salasyuk, I. Barykina, V. O. Smirnova, M. Frolov","doi":"10.31556/2219-0678.2020.39.1.061-069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to assess the cost of the severe bronchial asthma (BA) treatment with various biological agents at inpatient and day care setting from the compulsory medical insurance (CMI) system perspective.\n\nMethods. The authors constructed the MS Excel® analytical decision-making model and calculated the CMI system’s costs of severe BA treatment with various biological drugs at inpatient and day care setting. The costs of treatment with benralizumab, dupilumab, omalizumab, reslizumab and mepolizumab were compared. The cost difference between benralizumab and other drugs was identified taking into account the frequency of the drugs’ administration. The first administration was assumed to be inpatient, followed by the administrations in day care ward.\n\nResults. The use of benralizumab reduces the expenses of the CMI system by 0.8 million rubles per patient (–39%) compared with omalizumab, mepolizumab, resizumab and by 2.9 million rubles per patient (–69%) versus dupilumab due to the lowest frequency of administration, therefore less hospitalizations for therapy. With a 5-year modeling horizon, benralizumab therapy allows to reduce the CMI system expenses by 4.5 million rubles (–48%) compared with omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab and by 13.9 million rubles (–74%) compared with dupilumab. The use of benralizumab will release 5–7 cases per patient per year compared to omalizumab, resizumab and mepolizumab and 18–20 cases per patient per year compared to dupilumab.\n\nConclusion. Benralizumab therapy in patients with severe BA in inpatient and day care settings will lead to the optimization of CMI expenditures and more rational use of budgets allocated to hospitals.","PeriodicalId":18386,"journal":{"name":"Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice (Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор)","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice (Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31556/2219-0678.2020.39.1.061-069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: to assess the cost of the severe bronchial asthma (BA) treatment with various biological agents at inpatient and day care setting from the compulsory medical insurance (CMI) system perspective. Methods. The authors constructed the MS Excel® analytical decision-making model and calculated the CMI system’s costs of severe BA treatment with various biological drugs at inpatient and day care setting. The costs of treatment with benralizumab, dupilumab, omalizumab, reslizumab and mepolizumab were compared. The cost difference between benralizumab and other drugs was identified taking into account the frequency of the drugs’ administration. The first administration was assumed to be inpatient, followed by the administrations in day care ward. Results. The use of benralizumab reduces the expenses of the CMI system by 0.8 million rubles per patient (–39%) compared with omalizumab, mepolizumab, resizumab and by 2.9 million rubles per patient (–69%) versus dupilumab due to the lowest frequency of administration, therefore less hospitalizations for therapy. With a 5-year modeling horizon, benralizumab therapy allows to reduce the CMI system expenses by 4.5 million rubles (–48%) compared with omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab and by 13.9 million rubles (–74%) compared with dupilumab. The use of benralizumab will release 5–7 cases per patient per year compared to omalizumab, resizumab and mepolizumab and 18–20 cases per patient per year compared to dupilumab. Conclusion. Benralizumab therapy in patients with severe BA in inpatient and day care settings will lead to the optimization of CMI expenditures and more rational use of budgets allocated to hospitals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在住院和日托环境中治疗重度支气管哮喘的生物疗法Сost
目的:从强制医疗保险(CMI)制度的角度,评估重症支气管哮喘(BA)在住院和日托机构使用各种生物制剂治疗的成本。作者构建了MS Excel®分析决策模型,并计算了在住院和日托环境下使用各种生物药物治疗重度BA的CMI系统成本。比较了benralizumab、dupilumab、omalizumab、reslizumab和mepolizumab的治疗成本。贝纳利珠单抗和其他药物之间的成本差异是考虑到药物给药的频率而确定的。第一次给药假定是住院病人,其次是日托病房。结果。与omalizumab、mepolizumab、resizumab相比,使用benralizumab可使每位患者的CMI系统费用减少80万卢布(-39%),与dupilumab相比,由于给药频率最低,因此住院治疗次数减少,每位患者的费用减少290万卢布(-69%)。在5年的建模期内,与omalizumab、mepolizumab、reslizumab相比,benralizumab治疗可以减少450万卢布(-48%)的CMI系统费用,与dupilumab相比减少1390万卢布(-74%)。与omalizumab、resizumab和mepolizumab相比,使用benralizumab每年将释放5-7例患者,与dupilumab相比,每年将释放18-20例患者。Benralizumab治疗在住院和日托环境中的严重BA患者将导致CMI支出的优化和更合理地使用分配给医院的预算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of fixed combination of alogliptin and pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus Bruton’s tirosine kinase inhibitors in high-risk patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: modeled impact on the mortality from malignant neoplasms Validation of Russian-language version of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for patients with multiple sclerosis in the Russian Federation Effect of food intake on pharmacokinetic profile of the new original drug «Respoxyton» in healthy volunteers A project approach to effective resource management system in a hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1