{"title":"6. 18F-FDG Whole Body Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in the Detection of Unknown Primary Tumors","authors":"Trampal C., Sörensen J, Engler H, Långström B","doi":"10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00072-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To evaluate the utility of FDG-PET in detecting primary tumors in patients with metastatic disease from unknown primary tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> 12 patients with metastases from unknown origin after unsuccessful conventional diagnostic procedures were studied. 5 had lymph node metastases (2 axillary, 2 cervical, 1 mediastinal), 3 multiple metastases, 1 in the lung, 1 in the cava vein, 1 in the brain and 1 in adrenal glands. Patients received 400MBq FDG intravenously, and whole body images were acquired 60 min. after injection with an ECAT EXACT HR+. PET results were compared with histological and clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> All but one metastatic lesion was identified by PET. Additional metastases were visualized in 4 patients. In one helped to guide biopsy for histological diagnosis. In 4/11 patients FDG-PET did not reveal lesions suspected to be primary tumor. FDG-PET identified primary tumor in 8/11 patients (breast: 2, pancreas: 2, base of tongue: 1, adrenal gland: 1, lung: 1, stomach: 1). In 4 of them (33% of total) primary tumor was confirmed either histologically or by the clinical evolution (breast: 2, lung: 1, pancreas: 1). In 1 patient FDG-PET was false positive (base of tongue). 3 patients positive FDG-PET have not yet been confirmed. FDG-PET influenced therapeutic procedures in 4 patients (33% of total). 2 underwent surgery (breast), 1 received specific chemotherapy (lung) and 1 palliative chemotherapy (pancreas).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our preliminary results suggest that FDG-PET is a non-invasive technique useful in the detection of unknown primary tumors, can influence in selecting appropriate therapeutic management and could guide biopsies for histologic analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","volume":"3 4","pages":"Page 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00072-8","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039700000728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of FDG-PET in detecting primary tumors in patients with metastatic disease from unknown primary tumors.
Methods: 12 patients with metastases from unknown origin after unsuccessful conventional diagnostic procedures were studied. 5 had lymph node metastases (2 axillary, 2 cervical, 1 mediastinal), 3 multiple metastases, 1 in the lung, 1 in the cava vein, 1 in the brain and 1 in adrenal glands. Patients received 400MBq FDG intravenously, and whole body images were acquired 60 min. after injection with an ECAT EXACT HR+. PET results were compared with histological and clinical findings.
Results: All but one metastatic lesion was identified by PET. Additional metastases were visualized in 4 patients. In one helped to guide biopsy for histological diagnosis. In 4/11 patients FDG-PET did not reveal lesions suspected to be primary tumor. FDG-PET identified primary tumor in 8/11 patients (breast: 2, pancreas: 2, base of tongue: 1, adrenal gland: 1, lung: 1, stomach: 1). In 4 of them (33% of total) primary tumor was confirmed either histologically or by the clinical evolution (breast: 2, lung: 1, pancreas: 1). In 1 patient FDG-PET was false positive (base of tongue). 3 patients positive FDG-PET have not yet been confirmed. FDG-PET influenced therapeutic procedures in 4 patients (33% of total). 2 underwent surgery (breast), 1 received specific chemotherapy (lung) and 1 palliative chemotherapy (pancreas).
Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that FDG-PET is a non-invasive technique useful in the detection of unknown primary tumors, can influence in selecting appropriate therapeutic management and could guide biopsies for histologic analysis.