Military Occupational Specialty Codes: Utility In Predicting Inhalation Exposures In Post-9/11 Deployers.

L. Zell-Baran, R. Meehan, J. Wolff, M. Strand, S. Krefft, E. Gottschall, T. V. Macedonia, J. E. Gross, O. L. Sanders, G. Pepper, C. Rose
{"title":"Military Occupational Specialty Codes: Utility In Predicting Inhalation Exposures In Post-9/11 Deployers.","authors":"L. Zell-Baran, R. Meehan, J. Wolff, M. Strand, S. Krefft, E. Gottschall, T. V. Macedonia, J. E. Gross, O. L. Sanders, G. Pepper, C. Rose","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000001731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nExamine military occupational specialty (MOS) codes to identify those at risk from inhalation exposures during Southwest Asia deployment.\n\n\nMETHODS\nExposure intensity to diesel exhaust, sandstorms, burn pit smoke, combat dust and occupational vapors/dusts/gases/fumes (VDGF) were scored for all Army/Marine MOS codes by an expert panel. Based on MOS code, panel-rated exposure scores were compared to questionnaire data from military personnel with post-deployment respiratory illnesses.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAll exposures except VDGF were rated higher (range p < 0.0001 to p = 0.003) for combat versus non-combat MOS codes. Deployers with respiratory illnesses reported more intense exposure to diesel exhaust (p < 0.0001), burn pit smoke (p < 0.0001), and sandstorms (p = 0.005) compared to panel raters. These deployers clustered in MOS codes rated highest for inhalation hazard exposure intensity.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMOS codes are useful in identifying high risk military occupations where medical surveillance and exposure control should be focused.","PeriodicalId":46545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Examine military occupational specialty (MOS) codes to identify those at risk from inhalation exposures during Southwest Asia deployment. METHODS Exposure intensity to diesel exhaust, sandstorms, burn pit smoke, combat dust and occupational vapors/dusts/gases/fumes (VDGF) were scored for all Army/Marine MOS codes by an expert panel. Based on MOS code, panel-rated exposure scores were compared to questionnaire data from military personnel with post-deployment respiratory illnesses. RESULTS All exposures except VDGF were rated higher (range p < 0.0001 to p = 0.003) for combat versus non-combat MOS codes. Deployers with respiratory illnesses reported more intense exposure to diesel exhaust (p < 0.0001), burn pit smoke (p < 0.0001), and sandstorms (p = 0.005) compared to panel raters. These deployers clustered in MOS codes rated highest for inhalation hazard exposure intensity. CONCLUSIONS MOS codes are useful in identifying high risk military occupations where medical surveillance and exposure control should be focused.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事职业专业代码:预测9/11后部署人员吸入暴露的效用。
目的检查军事职业专业(MOS)代码,以识别在西南亚部署期间有吸入暴露风险的人员。方法由专家小组对陆军/海军所有MOS代码的柴油废气、沙尘暴、燃烧坑烟雾、战斗粉尘和职业蒸气/粉尘/气体/烟雾(VDGF)的暴露强度进行评分。基于MOS代码,将小组评定的暴露得分与患有部署后呼吸道疾病的军事人员的问卷数据进行比较。结果除VDGF外,所有暴露对战斗MOS编码的评分均高于非战斗MOS编码(p < 0.0001至p = 0.003)。与小组评分者相比,患有呼吸系统疾病的部署人员报告的柴油废气(p < 0.0001)、燃烧坑烟雾(p < 0.0001)和沙尘暴(p = 0.005)的暴露程度更高。这些部署人员聚集在吸入危害暴露强度最高的MOS代码中。结论smos代码可用于识别高危军事职业,应重点开展医学监测和暴露控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Metabolomic Tool in Assessing Environmental Exposure Fine and Ultrafine Particle Pollution Before and After a Smoking ban in the Catering Industry in Vienna Investigating the level of Safety Considerations in Radiology Centers (North of Iran): Cross –Sectional Study New Highlights. The Last Note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1