Evolution of Resistance-Associated Variants of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy of Hepatitis C in a Clinical Setting

A. Lai, L. Milazzo, A. Bergna, Maurizio Polano, F. Binda, M. Franzetti, V. Micheli, P. Ronzi, G. Zehender, S. Sollima, M. Galli, C. Balotta
{"title":"Evolution of Resistance-Associated Variants of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy of Hepatitis C in a Clinical Setting","authors":"A. Lai, L. Milazzo, A. Bergna, Maurizio Polano, F. Binda, M. Franzetti, V. Micheli, P. Ronzi, G. Zehender, S. Sollima, M. Galli, C. Balotta","doi":"10.4172/1948-5964.1000169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because of the high variability of Hepatitis C virus (HCV), it might be important to characterize in vivo the evolution of resistance-associated mutations (RAVs) to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in different genotypes. NS3-, NS5A- and NS5B-HCV substitutions were studied by next generation sequencing (NGS) on 74 HCVinfected patients who started a DAA regimen. RAVs with frequencies of 1% and 15% were analyzed. Globally, 43, 15, 12 and 4 patients were infected with subtype 1a, 1b, genotype 4 and subtype 3a, respectively. The majority of patients (64.8%) had cirrhosis, 70.3% were HIV-coinfected and 14.9% were DAA-experienced. Overall baseline prevalence of RAVs was 74.3%, 52.2%, 45.9% and 36.8% to any NS3, NS5B and NS5A inhibitors available at that time, respectively, and dropped to 39.2%, 26.1%, 22.8% and 16.2%, respectively, when only mutations associated with the ongoing regimen were considered. The highest proportion of mutations was detected in subtype 1a (81.4%, p=.026), particularly in NS3 region (76.9%, p<.001). Among the 7 failing patients, 57.1% had a baseline sequence showing substitutions as majority species. At the time of viral relapse two patients accumulated further RAVs that were missing even as minority variants at baseline Although almost half of the patients showed natural substitutions at baseline, these substitutions did not induce resistance to DAAs. A limited role of NGS with a low cut-off was suggested by our study, as the detection of minor species seems not to predict the selection for resistant variants at the time of failure. The impact of pre-treatment RAVs on the achievement of sustained virologic response with DAA is limited.","PeriodicalId":15020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antivirals & Antiretrovirals","volume":"79 1","pages":"87-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antivirals & Antiretrovirals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5964.1000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of the high variability of Hepatitis C virus (HCV), it might be important to characterize in vivo the evolution of resistance-associated mutations (RAVs) to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in different genotypes. NS3-, NS5A- and NS5B-HCV substitutions were studied by next generation sequencing (NGS) on 74 HCVinfected patients who started a DAA regimen. RAVs with frequencies of 1% and 15% were analyzed. Globally, 43, 15, 12 and 4 patients were infected with subtype 1a, 1b, genotype 4 and subtype 3a, respectively. The majority of patients (64.8%) had cirrhosis, 70.3% were HIV-coinfected and 14.9% were DAA-experienced. Overall baseline prevalence of RAVs was 74.3%, 52.2%, 45.9% and 36.8% to any NS3, NS5B and NS5A inhibitors available at that time, respectively, and dropped to 39.2%, 26.1%, 22.8% and 16.2%, respectively, when only mutations associated with the ongoing regimen were considered. The highest proportion of mutations was detected in subtype 1a (81.4%, p=.026), particularly in NS3 region (76.9%, p<.001). Among the 7 failing patients, 57.1% had a baseline sequence showing substitutions as majority species. At the time of viral relapse two patients accumulated further RAVs that were missing even as minority variants at baseline Although almost half of the patients showed natural substitutions at baseline, these substitutions did not induce resistance to DAAs. A limited role of NGS with a low cut-off was suggested by our study, as the detection of minor species seems not to predict the selection for resistant variants at the time of failure. The impact of pre-treatment RAVs on the achievement of sustained virologic response with DAA is limited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床环境中丙型肝炎全口服直接作用抗病毒治疗耐药相关变异的演变
由于丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的高度变异性,在体内研究不同基因型的直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)的耐药相关突变(RAVs)的进化特征可能很重要。通过下一代测序(NGS)对74例开始DAA治疗的hcv感染患者进行NS3-、NS5A-和NS5B-HCV替代研究。分析频率为1%和15%的RAVs。在全球范围内,分别有43例、15例、12例和4例患者感染了1a、1b、基因4和3a亚型。大多数患者(64.8%)合并肝硬化,70.3%合并hiv感染,14.9%合并daa。对于当时可用的任何NS3、NS5B和NS5A抑制剂,RAVs的总体基线患病率分别为74.3%、52.2%、45.9%和36.8%,当仅考虑与正在进行的方案相关的突变时,RAVs的总体基线患病率分别降至39.2%、26.1%、22.8%和16.2%。突变比例最高的是1a亚型(81.4%,p= 0.026),尤其是NS3区(76.9%,p< 0.001)。在7例失败的患者中,57.1%的基线序列显示替代为大多数物种。在病毒复发时,两名患者积累了进一步缺失的RAVs,即使在基线时也是少数变异,尽管几乎一半的患者在基线时表现出自然替代,但这些替代并未诱导对DAAs的耐药性。我们的研究表明,具有低临界值的NGS的作用有限,因为在失败时,小物种的检测似乎不能预测抗性变异的选择。治疗前的RAVs对DAA实现持续病毒学应答的影响是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
siRNA-Inhibition of TIGAR Hypersensitizes Human Papillomavirus-Transformed Cells to Apoptosis Induced by Chemotherapy Drugs that Cause Oxidative Stress Coroless, effective ingredient isolated from traditional Chinese medicine for the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 An Exploratory Study on COVID-19 and the Rights of Children Based on Keyword Network Analysis Comorbidities of COVID-19 Patients with Low Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value of Nucleocapsid (N) Gene: An Application to Cluster-Based Logistic Model. A Questionnaire-Based Survey to Assess the Timing of Intubation in COVID-19 Pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1