Awareness, Acceptability and Barriers to the Utilization of Modern Methods of Family Planning Among Women Attending Antenatal Clinic in Bayero University, Kano

A. Gajida, I. Takai, E. Ugwa, M. Yusuf
{"title":"Awareness, Acceptability and Barriers to the Utilization of Modern Methods of Family Planning Among Women Attending Antenatal Clinic in Bayero University, Kano","authors":"A. Gajida, I. Takai, E. Ugwa, M. Yusuf","doi":"10.31173/BOMJ.BOMJ_137_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) is generally very low in Nigeria, but particularly lowest in northern Nigeria. Barriers to access and utilization have been variously studied, but there is need to consider specific contexts. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the level of awareness, acceptability, and barriers to the utilization of modern methods of family planning in Bayero University, Kano, North-west, Nigeria. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the antenatal section of BUK staff clinic, among 152 pregnant women between May and October 2013. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Descriptive statistics was used to report categorical variables. Results: Awareness of modern methods of contraception was high (86.18%) and the majority (86.19%) knew at least one method of family planning. The commonest methods known by the respondents were: Oral contraceptive pills (39.47%), injectables (22.37%) and condom (14.47%). Out of the152 respondents, 77(50.66%) accepted the use of modern methods of family planning and 39(25.65%) out of these number had ever used at least one method, while 38(25.00%) did not. Fear of side effects (42.11%), desire for more children (15.79%), and lack of awareness (13.82%), religious prohibition (10.53%) and opposition by male partners (7.89%) constituted the major barriers to the utilization of modern methods of family planning. Conclusion: The level of awareness was found to be high but acceptability and utilization were low, this is due to the existing barriers to utilization of modern methods of family planning. Effort should be made to allay the fear of side effects and to educate women on the implication of frequent childbirth.","PeriodicalId":9110,"journal":{"name":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31173/BOMJ.BOMJ_137_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) is generally very low in Nigeria, but particularly lowest in northern Nigeria. Barriers to access and utilization have been variously studied, but there is need to consider specific contexts. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the level of awareness, acceptability, and barriers to the utilization of modern methods of family planning in Bayero University, Kano, North-west, Nigeria. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the antenatal section of BUK staff clinic, among 152 pregnant women between May and October 2013. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Descriptive statistics was used to report categorical variables. Results: Awareness of modern methods of contraception was high (86.18%) and the majority (86.19%) knew at least one method of family planning. The commonest methods known by the respondents were: Oral contraceptive pills (39.47%), injectables (22.37%) and condom (14.47%). Out of the152 respondents, 77(50.66%) accepted the use of modern methods of family planning and 39(25.65%) out of these number had ever used at least one method, while 38(25.00%) did not. Fear of side effects (42.11%), desire for more children (15.79%), and lack of awareness (13.82%), religious prohibition (10.53%) and opposition by male partners (7.89%) constituted the major barriers to the utilization of modern methods of family planning. Conclusion: The level of awareness was found to be high but acceptability and utilization were low, this is due to the existing barriers to utilization of modern methods of family planning. Effort should be made to allay the fear of side effects and to educate women on the implication of frequent childbirth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卡诺巴耶罗大学产前诊所就诊的妇女对现代计划生育方法的认识、接受程度和使用障碍
背景:尼日利亚的避孕普及率(CPR)普遍很低,但在尼日利亚北部尤其最低。对获取和利用的障碍进行了不同的研究,但需要考虑具体情况。目的:本研究的目的是确定在巴耶罗大学,卡诺,西北,尼日利亚现代计划生育方法的认识水平,可接受性和障碍的利用。方法:这是一项横断面研究,于2013年5月至10月在BUK工作人员诊所产前科进行,共有152名孕妇。获得了伦理批准和知情同意。描述性统计用于报告分类变量。结果:现代避孕方法知晓率高(86.18%),多数(86.19%)了解至少一种计划生育方法。受访者最常见的避孕方法是口服避孕药(39.47%)、注射剂(22.37%)和避孕套(14.47%)。在152名受访者中,77人(50.66%)接受现代计划生育方法的使用,其中39人(25.65%)曾经使用过至少一种方法,38人(25.00%)没有使用过。对副作用的恐惧(42.11%)、对多生孩子的渴望(15.79%)、缺乏意识(13.82%)、宗教禁止(10.53%)和男性伴侣反对(7.89%)是阻碍现代计划生育方法应用的主要因素。结论:对现代计划生育方法的认识程度较高,但接受度和利用率较低,这是由于现代计划生育方法的使用存在障碍。应该努力减轻对副作用的恐惧,并教育妇女关于频繁分娩的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Right Ventricular Systolic Function Using Tissue Doppler-Derived Tricuspid Lateral Annular Systolic Velocity (S`) Among HIV Patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) And Its Relationship with CD4 Cell Count and Viral Load Spondylocostal Dysostosis: Mild variant in a Nigerian Newborn A Huge Submucosal Fibroid Polyps; A Hidden Cause of Necroturia Unusual sequelae of persistent digit sucking Habit Facial Hyperkeratosis/Hyperpigmentation Health Issues of Nigerian Muslim Pilgrims in The Immediate Post Covid-19 Era Hajj Year 2022 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1