Exploring #nofilter Images When a Filter Has Been Used: Filtering the Truth on Instagram Through a Mixed Methods Approach Using Netlytic and Photo Analysis

S. Santarossa, Paige Coyne, S. J. Woodruff
{"title":"Exploring #nofilter Images When a Filter Has Been Used: Filtering the Truth on Instagram Through a Mixed Methods Approach Using Netlytic and Photo Analysis","authors":"S. Santarossa, Paige Coyne, S. J. Woodruff","doi":"10.4018/IJVCSN.2017010104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many social media users rely on photo editing techniques in order to receive more positive attention (i.e., likes/comments) online. This study used a mixed methods approach to conduct a descriptive analysis of #nofilter use by Instagram users. By using #nofilter users are making a point that they did not edit/manipulate their images. Of particular interest were those who used #nofilter but did filter their images. A text analysis of 18,366 images was conducted using Netlytic, reveling the largest content category as ‘appearance'. A content analysis was used to examine authors of #nofilter images whom did use a filter, and photo-coding scheme for this group of images was implemented. Of 18,366 images collected that used #nofilter, 12% (N=1630) did in fact use a filter. Listwise deletions were conducted and 1344 images remained. Results suggest the majority of accounts were personal, and belonged to females and of the images, majority had people in them. People using #nofilter do in fact filter their images and research into the reasons for deceit on social media is needed.","PeriodicalId":90871,"journal":{"name":"International journal of virtual communities and social networking","volume":"21 1","pages":"54-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of virtual communities and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVCSN.2017010104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Many social media users rely on photo editing techniques in order to receive more positive attention (i.e., likes/comments) online. This study used a mixed methods approach to conduct a descriptive analysis of #nofilter use by Instagram users. By using #nofilter users are making a point that they did not edit/manipulate their images. Of particular interest were those who used #nofilter but did filter their images. A text analysis of 18,366 images was conducted using Netlytic, reveling the largest content category as ‘appearance'. A content analysis was used to examine authors of #nofilter images whom did use a filter, and photo-coding scheme for this group of images was implemented. Of 18,366 images collected that used #nofilter, 12% (N=1630) did in fact use a filter. Listwise deletions were conducted and 1344 images remained. Results suggest the majority of accounts were personal, and belonged to females and of the images, majority had people in them. People using #nofilter do in fact filter their images and research into the reasons for deceit on social media is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当使用过滤器时探索#nofilter图像:通过使用Netlytic和照片分析的混合方法方法过滤Instagram上的真相
许多社交媒体用户依靠照片编辑技术来获得更多的在线积极关注(即点赞/评论)。本研究采用混合方法对Instagram用户使用#nofilter进行描述性分析。通过使用#nofilter,用户表明他们没有编辑/操纵他们的图像。特别感兴趣的是那些使用#nofilter但确实过滤了照片的人。使用Netlytic对18366张图像进行了文本分析,发现最大的内容类别是“外观”。使用内容分析来检查使用了过滤器的#nofilter图像的作者,并实现了这组图像的照片编码方案。在收集的18366张使用#nofilter的图片中,12% (N=1630)实际上使用了滤镜。按列表进行删除,留下1344张图像。结果表明,大多数账户都是私人的,属于女性,而且大多数照片中都有人物。使用#nofilter的人实际上是在过滤自己的照片,有必要研究一下社交媒体上欺骗的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensuring Privacy of Participants Recruited via Social Media: An Australian Retrospective Visualisation and Roadmap Virtual Communities and Social Networking in Franchising Information and Its Conceptual Perspectives Artificial Neural Network Research in Online Social Networks The Interdisciplinary Nature of Information Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1