De vuelta a la clínica. Métodos I. Diseños de investigación. Mayor calidad de información, mayor certeza a la respuesta.

Juan O Talavera, Ivonne Roy-García, Lino Palacios-Cruz, Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz, Irma Hoyo, Marcela Pérez-Rodríguez
{"title":"De vuelta a la clínica. Métodos I. Diseños de investigación. Mayor calidad de información, mayor certeza a la respuesta.","authors":"Juan O Talavera, Ivonne Roy-García, Lino Palacios-Cruz, Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz, Irma Hoyo, Marcela Pérez-Rodríguez","doi":"10.24875/GMM.19005226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research designs refer to the way information is obtained and are limited by ethical, economic and temporal viability. Research designs are standardized strategies to reduce biases, which in the architectural model of research are identified in the baseline state, the maneuver and the outcome; hence, there are no specific designs for each question. The design with the lowest probability of bias is the clinical trial, followed by cohort and case-control studies and, finally, by cross-sectional surveys. Among the main characteristics that give merit to research designs are the following: population inquiry, which refers to the situation of the population in relation to the clinical course/natural history of the disease; the maneuver, or action that is expected to modify the baseline state, which can be observational or experimental; follow-up, or documented monitoring that is given to each subject, which can be longitudinal or cross-sectional; and directionality, which can prolective or retrolective and refers to the timing of data collection for research purposes. It will always be better having a valuable question, even when answered with a design with higher risk of bias, than a question that is irrelevant or has no applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":86104,"journal":{"name":"Langenbecks Archiv fur klinische Chirurgie ... vereinigt mit Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Chirurgie","volume":"316 1","pages":"399-405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446753/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbecks Archiv fur klinische Chirurgie ... vereinigt mit Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.19005226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research designs refer to the way information is obtained and are limited by ethical, economic and temporal viability. Research designs are standardized strategies to reduce biases, which in the architectural model of research are identified in the baseline state, the maneuver and the outcome; hence, there are no specific designs for each question. The design with the lowest probability of bias is the clinical trial, followed by cohort and case-control studies and, finally, by cross-sectional surveys. Among the main characteristics that give merit to research designs are the following: population inquiry, which refers to the situation of the population in relation to the clinical course/natural history of the disease; the maneuver, or action that is expected to modify the baseline state, which can be observational or experimental; follow-up, or documented monitoring that is given to each subject, which can be longitudinal or cross-sectional; and directionality, which can prolective or retrolective and refers to the timing of data collection for research purposes. It will always be better having a valuable question, even when answered with a design with higher risk of bias, than a question that is irrelevant or has no applicability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回到诊所。方法一、研究设计。更高质量的信息,更大的确定性的答案。
研究设计是指获取信息的方式,受到伦理、经济和时间可行性的限制。研究设计是减少偏差的标准化策略,在研究的架构模型中,这些偏差在基线状态、机动和结果中被识别;因此,没有针对每个问题的具体设计。偏倚概率最低的设计是临床试验,其次是队列研究和病例对照研究,最后是横断面调查。研究设计的主要特点如下:人口调查,指的是与疾病的临床过程/自然史有关的人口情况;预期改变基线状态的机动或行动,可以是观察性的或实验性的;对每个受试者的跟踪或记录监测,可以是纵向的或横向的;方向性,可以是追溯性,也可以是追溯性,指的是为了研究目的而收集数据的时间。有一个有价值的问题总是比一个不相关或没有适用性的问题更好,即使回答的设计有更高的偏见风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Nasal Obstruction Symptoms and Pulmonary Function Following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Inequality and the social construction of urban disaster risk in multi-hazard contexts: the case of Lima, Peru and the COVID-19 pandemic. Einleitende Worte [Bile]. Evaluation of the first U.S. staple foods ordinance: impact on nutritional quality of food store offerings, customer purchases and home food environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1