GC/MIP/AED method for pesticide residue determination in fruits and vegetables.

K. Ting, P. Kho
{"title":"GC/MIP/AED method for pesticide residue determination in fruits and vegetables.","authors":"K. Ting, P. Kho","doi":"10.1093/JAOAC/74.6.991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research describes the results of a gas chromatography/microwave induced plasma/atomic emission detection (GC/MIP/AED) method performed on a Hewlett-Packard 5921A system for pesticide residue analysis in fruits and vegetables. A total of 6 experiments were conducted: (1) sensitivity and linearity studies for elements S, P, Cl, and N by analyzing dursban; (2) a study of instrument response to Cl concentration in pesticide molecules; (3) organochlorinated pesticide recoveries; (4) organophosphate pesticide recoveries; (5) carbamate pesticide recoveries; and (6) investigation of metallic pesticides with plictran and vendex as standards. The rank according to sensitivity and linearity was found to be as follows: S-181 greater than P-178 greater than Cl-479 greater than N-174. Instrument response to the concentration of chlorine atoms in the pesticide molecule was linear, with a correlation coefficient of 0.89. Recoveries of organochlorinated pesticides were 91.7-109.3%, with the exception of citrus, whose recovery was affected by coeluting interferences. Organophosphate recoveries were 73.2% or higher, except for the cygon oxygen analog, which degraded in the GC system under all circumstances. Carbamate recoveries were inconsistent quantitatively; however, the information generated from elements N and S were useful for qualitative confirmation of other methods, such as LC postcolumn derivatization analysis. Overall, the GC/MIP/AED method is powerful for qualitative confirmation in pesticide residue analysis. The instrument's capability of acquiring multi-elements (Cl and P) selectively and accurately is an alternative method for organochlorinated and organophosphate pesticide residue analyses. In addition, the GC/MIP/AED system is easy to use, simple to maintain, and its chromatograms can be interpreted by any chromatography analyst without much prior training.","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"51 1","pages":"991-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.6.991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This research describes the results of a gas chromatography/microwave induced plasma/atomic emission detection (GC/MIP/AED) method performed on a Hewlett-Packard 5921A system for pesticide residue analysis in fruits and vegetables. A total of 6 experiments were conducted: (1) sensitivity and linearity studies for elements S, P, Cl, and N by analyzing dursban; (2) a study of instrument response to Cl concentration in pesticide molecules; (3) organochlorinated pesticide recoveries; (4) organophosphate pesticide recoveries; (5) carbamate pesticide recoveries; and (6) investigation of metallic pesticides with plictran and vendex as standards. The rank according to sensitivity and linearity was found to be as follows: S-181 greater than P-178 greater than Cl-479 greater than N-174. Instrument response to the concentration of chlorine atoms in the pesticide molecule was linear, with a correlation coefficient of 0.89. Recoveries of organochlorinated pesticides were 91.7-109.3%, with the exception of citrus, whose recovery was affected by coeluting interferences. Organophosphate recoveries were 73.2% or higher, except for the cygon oxygen analog, which degraded in the GC system under all circumstances. Carbamate recoveries were inconsistent quantitatively; however, the information generated from elements N and S were useful for qualitative confirmation of other methods, such as LC postcolumn derivatization analysis. Overall, the GC/MIP/AED method is powerful for qualitative confirmation in pesticide residue analysis. The instrument's capability of acquiring multi-elements (Cl and P) selectively and accurately is an alternative method for organochlorinated and organophosphate pesticide residue analyses. In addition, the GC/MIP/AED system is easy to use, simple to maintain, and its chromatograms can be interpreted by any chromatography analyst without much prior training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GC/MIP/AED法测定果蔬中农药残留
本文介绍了在惠普5921A系统上,气相色谱/微波诱导等离子体/原子发射检测(GC/MIP/AED)方法用于果蔬中农药残留分析的结果。共进行了6项实验:(1)通过分析durban对S、P、Cl、N元素的敏感性和线性研究;(2)仪器对农药分子中Cl浓度的响应研究;(3)有机氯农药回收;(4)有机磷农药回收;(5)氨基甲酸酯类农药回收;(6)以plictran和vendex为标准的金属农药调查。灵敏度和线性度排序如下:S-181大于P-178大于Cl-479大于N-174。仪器对农药分子中氯原子浓度的响应呈线性关系,相关系数为0.89。有机氯农药的回收率为91.7 ~ 109.3%,但柑橘的回收率受脱色干扰影响。有机磷回收率为73.2%或更高,除了在所有情况下都在气相色谱系统中降解的氧模拟物。氨基甲酸酯回收率在定量上不一致;然而,从元素N和S产生的信息对其他方法的定性确认是有用的,如LC柱后衍生化分析。综上所述,GC/MIP/AED方法在农药残留分析中具有较强的定性确证能力。该仪器具有选择性地、准确地获取多元素(Cl和P)的能力,是有机氯和有机磷农药残留分析的一种替代方法。此外,GC/MIP/AED系统易于使用,易于维护,其色谱图可以由任何色谱分析人员解释,无需太多的事先培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liquid chromatographic determination of paralytic shellfish poisons in shellfish after prechromatographic oxidation. Liquid chromatographic determination of paraquat and diquat in crops using a silica column with aqueous ionic mobile phase. Enzymatic determination of free glutamic acid in dried soups and in minced sausages: NMKL collaborative study. Separation and determination of diesel contaminants in various fish products by capillary gas chromatography. Monitoring aldehyde production during frying by reversed-phase liquid chromatography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1