A systematic review of the impact of Ghana’s school feeding programme on educational and nutritional outcomes

O. N. Awojobi
{"title":"A systematic review of the impact of Ghana’s school feeding programme on educational and nutritional outcomes","authors":"O. N. Awojobi","doi":"10.4314/AS.V18I2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ghana School Feeding Programme (SFP) was introduced in 2005 to improve educational and health outcomes. Due to the role the intervention has played in meeting its objectives, the review was conceived to assess the impact of the intervention on anthropometric, behavioural, cognitive, and health and nutritional outcomes. A systematic review search for non-experimental and quasi-experimental studies was conducted on different databases, websites and reference lists of selected studies. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included in the review. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and they report on the role of Ghanaian’s school feeding programme as an intervention that the government is using to improve educational and health outcomes of beneficiaries. Different evaluation methods were used to assess the impact of SFP, six studies used post study design, only one study adopted Difference-in-Differences (DID) technique, five studies used a pre-post study, two studies embraced a cross-sectional study and one study adopted comparative analysis. Outcomes measured by the studies include enrolment, attendance, retention and academic performance. Others are wasting, thinness and stunting. Supporting evidence shows that the school feeding programme improved educational and health outcomes. However, the evidence of food for education on cognitive development was weak. Food for education is a social safety net that stakeholders in developing countries are using to encourage pupil enrolment, attendance and the improvement of academic performance. While the intervention played a pivotal role in these regards, there were other challenges that affected the intervention in achieving its main objective. Keywords: attendance, enrolment, Ghana, retention","PeriodicalId":15011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agro-environmental Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agro-environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AS.V18I2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Ghana School Feeding Programme (SFP) was introduced in 2005 to improve educational and health outcomes. Due to the role the intervention has played in meeting its objectives, the review was conceived to assess the impact of the intervention on anthropometric, behavioural, cognitive, and health and nutritional outcomes. A systematic review search for non-experimental and quasi-experimental studies was conducted on different databases, websites and reference lists of selected studies. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included in the review. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and they report on the role of Ghanaian’s school feeding programme as an intervention that the government is using to improve educational and health outcomes of beneficiaries. Different evaluation methods were used to assess the impact of SFP, six studies used post study design, only one study adopted Difference-in-Differences (DID) technique, five studies used a pre-post study, two studies embraced a cross-sectional study and one study adopted comparative analysis. Outcomes measured by the studies include enrolment, attendance, retention and academic performance. Others are wasting, thinness and stunting. Supporting evidence shows that the school feeding programme improved educational and health outcomes. However, the evidence of food for education on cognitive development was weak. Food for education is a social safety net that stakeholders in developing countries are using to encourage pupil enrolment, attendance and the improvement of academic performance. While the intervention played a pivotal role in these regards, there were other challenges that affected the intervention in achieving its main objective. Keywords: attendance, enrolment, Ghana, retention
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对加纳学校供餐计划对教育和营养成果影响的系统审查
2005年实施了加纳学校供餐方案,以改善教育和保健成果。鉴于干预措施在实现其目标方面发挥的作用,本次审查旨在评估干预措施对人体测量学、行为、认知以及健康和营养结果的影响。对所选研究的不同数据库、网站和参考文献进行了非实验和准实验研究的系统综述检索。本综述包括定量和定性研究。16项研究符合纳入标准,它们报告了加纳学校供餐方案作为一种干预措施的作用,政府正在利用这种干预措施改善受益者的教育和健康成果。采用不同的评估方法评估SFP的影响,6项研究采用后研究设计,只有1项研究采用差异中差异(DID)技术,5项研究采用后研究,2项研究采用横断面研究,1项研究采用比较分析。这些研究衡量的结果包括入学率、出勤率、留校率和学习成绩。其他人则消瘦、消瘦和发育不良。支持性证据表明,学校供餐方案改善了教育和健康成果。然而,关于食物教育对认知发展的影响的证据并不充分。“以食物换教育”是一个社会安全网,发展中国家的利益攸关方正在利用它来鼓励学生入学、出勤率和学习成绩的提高。虽然干预在这些方面发挥了关键作用,但还有其他挑战影响了干预在实现其主要目标方面的作用。关键词:出勤率,入学率,加纳,保留率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growth and mitotic chromosomes of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) plants as affected by spent engine oil in sandy-loam soils Determinants of youth participation in agribusiness activities in Ikwuano Local Government Area, Abia State, Nigeria Intensity of palm fruit processing technology-use among palm fruits’ processors in onicha local government area in Ebonyi State, Nigeria Cultural practices and post-harvest handling of selected neglected food crops in south-east and South-south Nigeria Tied ridging enhances soil water conservation and productivity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1