Political Practices and Mechanisms of Influence on Public Perceptions of Science

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Filosofiya-Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-03-10 DOI:10.53656/phil2023-01-03
S. Alexandrova
{"title":"Political Practices and Mechanisms of Influence on Public Perceptions of Science","authors":"S. Alexandrova","doi":"10.53656/phil2023-01-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on studying public attitudes toward science in Bulgaria and the role of political discourse in shaping public expectations and perceptions. The study's methodology includes an analysis of theoretical concepts and their empirical verification with data from a quantitative Eurobarometer survey (Special Eurobarometer 516) and a discourse analysis of the representation of the scientific sphere in the public debate. The Bulgarian social reality clearly shows a blurring of the role, nature, and participation of science in societal development, the imposition of populist societal expectations towards it, as well as political statements that abuse the reputation of the scientific sphere and its representatives.","PeriodicalId":53786,"journal":{"name":"Filosofiya-Philosophy","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofiya-Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/phil2023-01-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper focuses on studying public attitudes toward science in Bulgaria and the role of political discourse in shaping public expectations and perceptions. The study's methodology includes an analysis of theoretical concepts and their empirical verification with data from a quantitative Eurobarometer survey (Special Eurobarometer 516) and a discourse analysis of the representation of the scientific sphere in the public debate. The Bulgarian social reality clearly shows a blurring of the role, nature, and participation of science in societal development, the imposition of populist societal expectations towards it, as well as political statements that abuse the reputation of the scientific sphere and its representatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响公众科学认知的政治实践和机制
这篇论文的重点是研究保加利亚公众对科学的态度以及政治话语在塑造公众期望和看法方面的作用。该研究的方法包括对理论概念的分析,以及对定量欧洲晴雨表调查(Special Eurobarometer 516)数据的实证验证,以及对公共辩论中科学领域代表性的话语分析。保加利亚的社会现实清楚地表明,科学在社会发展中的作用、性质和参与是模糊的,对科学强加民粹主义的社会期望,以及滥用科学领域及其代表的声誉的政治声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Filosofiya-Philosophy
Filosofiya-Philosophy PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Development of The “Indian Thread” in Europe: Transmission and Reception of Eastern Ideas in the West Eighteenth National Ethics Conference Faith and Trust – Ethical Aspects and Moral Values A Brilliant Example of How Philosophy Could Help Solve Some of the Greatest Contemporary Puzzles in Physics Deduction of Categories in a Definition of Art Unilinearity and/or Variability. Eastern and Western Concepts of Predestination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1