Chinese Small Business Credit Scoring: Application of Multiple Hybrids Neural Network

Chi Guo-tai, Mohammad Zoynul Abedin, F. Moula
{"title":"Chinese Small Business Credit Scoring: Application of Multiple Hybrids Neural Network","authors":"Chi Guo-tai, Mohammad Zoynul Abedin, F. Moula","doi":"10.14257/IJDTA.2017.10.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, hybrid models have proven to be a promising approach for the forecasting of credit status, therefore, the aim of this project is to examine the prediction performance of hybrid classifiers. Particularly, the combination of the feature engineering with popular neural network (NN) classifiers; an hybridization approach, is compared with hybrid classifier, NN classifiers, and three well-known baseline classifiers, i.e. stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA), stepwise logistic regression (SLR), and decision trees (DTs). Overall, we executed a 12+8+ (8×8) experimental design that resulted in 84 unique classification models; i.e., 12 baseline models, 8 NN models, and 64 hybrid models, a multiple hybrid; are examined over a large credit scoring dataset from a Chinese commercial bank. Besides, thirteen evaluation measures are used for the assessment task and this may be the first effort to link up multiple hybrid classifiers with multiple performance metrics for the evaluation of small business credit. The results reveal that the predictive and distinguish ability of the F ratio based SDA with multilayer perceptron based NN classifier (SDA FR +MLP), a hybrid model, outperforms both of the one–dimensional scoring models (baseline model and NN model) and its hybrid counterparts.","PeriodicalId":13926,"journal":{"name":"International journal of database theory and application","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of database theory and application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14257/IJDTA.2017.10.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In recent years, hybrid models have proven to be a promising approach for the forecasting of credit status, therefore, the aim of this project is to examine the prediction performance of hybrid classifiers. Particularly, the combination of the feature engineering with popular neural network (NN) classifiers; an hybridization approach, is compared with hybrid classifier, NN classifiers, and three well-known baseline classifiers, i.e. stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA), stepwise logistic regression (SLR), and decision trees (DTs). Overall, we executed a 12+8+ (8×8) experimental design that resulted in 84 unique classification models; i.e., 12 baseline models, 8 NN models, and 64 hybrid models, a multiple hybrid; are examined over a large credit scoring dataset from a Chinese commercial bank. Besides, thirteen evaluation measures are used for the assessment task and this may be the first effort to link up multiple hybrid classifiers with multiple performance metrics for the evaluation of small business credit. The results reveal that the predictive and distinguish ability of the F ratio based SDA with multilayer perceptron based NN classifier (SDA FR +MLP), a hybrid model, outperforms both of the one–dimensional scoring models (baseline model and NN model) and its hybrid counterparts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国小企业信用评分:多元混合神经网络的应用
近年来,混合模型已被证明是一种很有前途的信用状况预测方法,因此,本项目的目的是检验混合分类器的预测性能。特别是将特征工程与流行的神经网络(NN)分类器相结合;一种杂交方法,比较了混合分类器,神经网络分类器和三种众所周知的基线分类器,即逐步判别分析(SDA),逐步逻辑回归(SLR)和决策树(dt)。总的来说,我们执行了一个12+8+ (8×8)的实验设计,产生了84个独特的分类模型;即12个基线模型,8个神经网络模型,64个混合模型,一个多重混合模型;在中国一家商业银行的大型信用评分数据集上进行了研究。此外,评估任务使用了13个评估指标,这可能是首次将多个混合分类器与多个绩效指标联系起来进行小企业信贷评估。结果表明,基于F比率的SDA与基于多层感知器的神经网络分类器(SDA FR +MLP)混合模型的预测和区分能力优于一维评分模型(基线模型和神经网络模型)及其混合模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Logical Data Integration Model for the Integration of Data Repositories Fuzzy Associative Classification Driven MapReduce Computing Solution for Effective Learning from Uncertain and Dynamic Big Data Decision Tree Algorithms C4.5 and C5.0 in Data Mining: A Review Evaluating Intelligent Search Agents in a Controlled Environment Using Complex Queries: An Empirical Study ScaffdCF: A Prototype Interface for Managing Conflicts in Peer Review Process of Open Collaboration Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1