Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in School-Aged Children and Adolescents

Chunjie Lu, D. Song, Yize Chen, Changsen Tu, X. Mao, Liangde Xu
{"title":"Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in School-Aged Children and Adolescents","authors":"Chunjie Lu, D. Song, Yize Chen, Changsen Tu, X. Mao, Liangde Xu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo assess the validity, differences and agreements among measurements of refractive status in school-aged children and adolescents using Goaleye RM-9000, Nidek AR-1 and Topcon RM-800. \n \n \nMethods: \nIn this prospective study, 449 individuals (449 right eyes) aged from 9 to 18 from Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University were measured in turns by the three autorefractors for their refractive status in random sequence from May to June, 2019. Then a professional optometrist conducted a subjective refraction for them by phoropter. All measurements by the three autorefractors were compared using a Friedman test, and measurements by the three autorefractors were compared with the subjective refraction respectively using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. \n \n \nResults: \nThe median of spherical equivalent (SE) from Goaleye RM-9000, Nidek AR-1, Topcon RM-800 and the subjective refraction were -2.38(2.63)D, -2.63(2.44)D, -2.75(2.56)D and -2.38(2.50)D, respectively. There were significant differences among the SE of the three autorefractors in the refraction measurement of school-aged children and adolescents (χ2=384.893, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the SE of Goaleye RM-9000 and subjective refraction (Z=-0.199, P=0.842), There were significant differences between the SE of Nidek AR-1 and subjective refraction (Z=-11.753, P<0.001), There were significant differences between the SE of Topcon RM-800 and subjective refraction (Z=-15.733, P<0.001). \n \n \nConclusion: \nThe measurements conducted by Goaleye RM-9000 and Nidek AR-1 were more accurate than by Topcon RM-800. There were significant differences among the results of the three autorefractors in the refraction measurement of school-aged children and adolescents. \n \n \nKey words: \nrefractive error; refraction; spherical equivalent; agreement; children and adolescents","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"63 1","pages":"721-726"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.10.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity, differences and agreements among measurements of refractive status in school-aged children and adolescents using Goaleye RM-9000, Nidek AR-1 and Topcon RM-800. Methods: In this prospective study, 449 individuals (449 right eyes) aged from 9 to 18 from Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University were measured in turns by the three autorefractors for their refractive status in random sequence from May to June, 2019. Then a professional optometrist conducted a subjective refraction for them by phoropter. All measurements by the three autorefractors were compared using a Friedman test, and measurements by the three autorefractors were compared with the subjective refraction respectively using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Results: The median of spherical equivalent (SE) from Goaleye RM-9000, Nidek AR-1, Topcon RM-800 and the subjective refraction were -2.38(2.63)D, -2.63(2.44)D, -2.75(2.56)D and -2.38(2.50)D, respectively. There were significant differences among the SE of the three autorefractors in the refraction measurement of school-aged children and adolescents (χ2=384.893, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the SE of Goaleye RM-9000 and subjective refraction (Z=-0.199, P=0.842), There were significant differences between the SE of Nidek AR-1 and subjective refraction (Z=-11.753, P<0.001), There were significant differences between the SE of Topcon RM-800 and subjective refraction (Z=-15.733, P<0.001). Conclusion: The measurements conducted by Goaleye RM-9000 and Nidek AR-1 were more accurate than by Topcon RM-800. There were significant differences among the results of the three autorefractors in the refraction measurement of school-aged children and adolescents. Key words: refractive error; refraction; spherical equivalent; agreement; children and adolescents
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄儿童和青少年使用三种自折射仪的屈光测量比较
目的:评价Goaleye RM-9000、Nidek AR-1和Topcon RM-800测量学龄儿童和青少年屈光状态的有效性、差异和一致性。方法:本前瞻性研究于2019年5月至6月随机顺序对温州医科大学眼科医院9 ~ 18岁的449例(449只右眼)患者进行自折射仪轮流测量。然后由专业验光师用照相机为他们进行主观折射。用Friedman检验比较三个自折射仪的测量值,用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较三个自折射仪的测量值与主观折射值。结果:Goaleye RM-9000、Nidek AR-1、Topcon RM-800的球等效(SE)中位数和主观屈光分别为-2.38(2.63)D、-2.63(2.44)D、-2.75(2.56)D和-2.38(2.50)D。三种自折射仪在学龄儿童和青少年屈光测量中的SE差异有统计学意义(χ2=384.893, P<0.001)。Goaleye RM-9000的SE与主观屈光无显著差异(Z=-0.199, P=0.842), Nidek AR-1的SE与主观屈光有显著差异(Z=-11.753, P<0.001), Topcon RM-800的SE与主观屈光有显著差异(Z=-15.733, P<0.001)。结论:Goaleye RM-9000和Nidek AR-1的测量精度高于Topcon RM-800。三种自折射仪对学龄儿童和青少年的屈光度测量结果有显著性差异。关键词:屈光不正;折射;球形等效;协议;儿童和青少年
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1