Evaluation of an Antibody-Based Test for the Diagnosis of Chikungunya Infection

M. T. Islam, A. Nessa, Sharmin Sultana, M. Islam, M. F. Rahaman, Mohammad Ehasun Uddin Khan, M Zahid Hasan, M. Atiqul, Haque
{"title":"Evaluation of an Antibody-Based Test for the Diagnosis of Chikungunya Infection","authors":"M. T. Islam, A. Nessa, Sharmin Sultana, M. Islam, M. F. Rahaman, Mohammad Ehasun Uddin Khan, M Zahid Hasan, M. Atiqul, Haque","doi":"10.3329/jcamr.v7i2.49594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The diagnosis of chikungunya is confusing due to similar clinical presentations of different viral illnesses. \nObjective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of an antibody-based test for the diagnosis of chikungunya infection \nMethodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, from July to September 2017 when an outbreak of chikungunya occurred in Bangladesh. Chikungunya patients were evaluated by the IgM antibody test by immunochromatographic method (ICT) during both the early phase and the convalescent-phase. The sensitivity and specificity of the IgM antibody test were estimated considering the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method as the gold standard. \nResult: The sensitivity and specificity of the IgM antibody test in the acute phase were 2.7 percent and 79.5 percent, respectively. In contrast, in the convalescence phase, sensitivity and specificity were 86.5 percent and 33.3 percent. \nConclusion: Antibody-based testing was found not suitable for detecting chikungunya infection during the acute phase of the illness. \nJournal of Current and Advance Medical Research 2020;7(2): 68-72","PeriodicalId":15413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcamr.v7i2.49594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of chikungunya is confusing due to similar clinical presentations of different viral illnesses. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of an antibody-based test for the diagnosis of chikungunya infection Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Internal Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, from July to September 2017 when an outbreak of chikungunya occurred in Bangladesh. Chikungunya patients were evaluated by the IgM antibody test by immunochromatographic method (ICT) during both the early phase and the convalescent-phase. The sensitivity and specificity of the IgM antibody test were estimated considering the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method as the gold standard. Result: The sensitivity and specificity of the IgM antibody test in the acute phase were 2.7 percent and 79.5 percent, respectively. In contrast, in the convalescence phase, sensitivity and specificity were 86.5 percent and 33.3 percent. Conclusion: Antibody-based testing was found not suitable for detecting chikungunya infection during the acute phase of the illness. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research 2020;7(2): 68-72
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于抗体的基孔肯雅热感染诊断试验的评价
背景:基孔肯雅热的诊断是混乱的,由于类似的临床表现不同的病毒性疾病。目的:本研究的目的是评估基于抗体的基孔肯雅感染诊断检测的准确性。方法:本横断面研究于2017年7月至9月在孟加拉国发生基孔肯雅热暴发时在达卡Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学内科进行。采用免疫层析法(ICT)对基孔肯雅热早期和恢复期患者进行IgM抗体检测。以聚合酶链反应(PCR)法为金标准,评估IgM抗体检测的敏感性和特异性。结果:急性期IgM抗体检测的敏感性为2.7%,特异性为79.5%。而恢复期的敏感性和特异性分别为86.5%和33.3%。结论:在基孔肯雅病急性期,抗体检测方法不适用于基孔肯雅病感染的检测。现代医学研究进展2020;7(2):68-72
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Miniperc and Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stone: An Open Level Parallel Arm Randomized Control Trial Characteristics of Carotid Artery among Ischemic Heart Disease Patients with or without Diabetes Mellitus Embracing the Potential of Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Path to Hope and Progress Age and Gender Differences with Clinical Presentation of Patients with Histopathological and CT-Scan Confirmed Parapharyngeal Mass Anthropometric Analysis Between Naso Aural Inclination and Their Correlation in Bangladeshi Buddhist Rakhain Ethnic Females
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1