Cone’s Binary View of Africanness and Christianity Through the Eyes of his African American Critics

J. Urbaniak
{"title":"Cone’s Binary View of Africanness and Christianity Through the Eyes of his African American Critics","authors":"J. Urbaniak","doi":"10.7832/46-2-308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike some of his American colleagues, James Cone tended to distance Black Theology from Africanness in general and African Traditional Religions in particular. Throughout his life this tendency has evolved, but never disappeared altogether. This article sets out to achieve three goals. First, I give a historical account of Cone’s relationship with Africa, particularly with African religiosity, focusing on the criticism he received from his colleagues in the U.S. (notably Gayraud Wilmore, Cecil Cone and Charles Long). Second, I analyse the tension between the Christian and the African in Cone’s theological outlook by probing his notion of indigenization/Africanization among others. Third, I seek to interpret Cone’s binary view of Christianity and Africanness in the light of his chief locus of enunciation, namely Western Christianity (albeit contested). My attempt here is to lay foundations for an engagement with Cone’s attitude toward Africanness from the current South African (decolonial) perspective by considering it, first, within its original African American context.","PeriodicalId":82022,"journal":{"name":"Missionalia hispanica","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Missionalia hispanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7832/46-2-308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Unlike some of his American colleagues, James Cone tended to distance Black Theology from Africanness in general and African Traditional Religions in particular. Throughout his life this tendency has evolved, but never disappeared altogether. This article sets out to achieve three goals. First, I give a historical account of Cone’s relationship with Africa, particularly with African religiosity, focusing on the criticism he received from his colleagues in the U.S. (notably Gayraud Wilmore, Cecil Cone and Charles Long). Second, I analyse the tension between the Christian and the African in Cone’s theological outlook by probing his notion of indigenization/Africanization among others. Third, I seek to interpret Cone’s binary view of Christianity and Africanness in the light of his chief locus of enunciation, namely Western Christianity (albeit contested). My attempt here is to lay foundations for an engagement with Cone’s attitude toward Africanness from the current South African (decolonial) perspective by considering it, first, within its original African American context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从非裔美国人批评家的视角看科恩对非洲性和基督教的二元观点
与他的一些美国同事不同,詹姆斯·科恩倾向于将黑人神学与一般的非洲性,特别是非洲传统宗教区分开来。在他的一生中,这种倾向不断发展,但从未完全消失。本文旨在实现三个目标。首先,我对科恩与非洲的关系进行了历史描述,特别是与非洲宗教的关系,重点是他从美国同事(特别是Gayraud Wilmore, Cecil Cone和Charles Long)那里收到的批评。其次,我通过探讨他的本土化/非洲化的概念来分析在科恩的神学观点中基督徒和非洲人之间的紧张关系。第三,我试图解释科恩对基督教和非洲性的二元观点,根据他的主要表达点,即西方基督教(尽管有争议)。我在这里的尝试是从当前南非(非殖民化)的角度出发,通过首先在其原始的非裔美国人背景下考虑它,来为科恩对非洲性的态度奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
St Cuthbert’s Mission Station: Fragments of living heritage, the archive and documentary filmmaking – ‘the future of the past’ Church and community: New hope for Africa Reimagining a new social contract in the public space Evangelical Church and Society Pentecost of the city: Towards an African urban migratory theology “Lewe vir die stad” – Life/Live for the city A case study of reimagining congregational culture and its relationship with the city as a first step towards establishing a new social contract
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1