The Comparative Politics of Immigration. Policy Choices in Germany, Canada, Switzerland, and the United States By Antje Ellermann . Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics Series. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 435 pp., $39.99 Paper.

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1017/rep.2022.3
J. Money
{"title":"The Comparative Politics of Immigration. Policy Choices in Germany, Canada, Switzerland, and the United States By Antje Ellermann . Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics Series. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 435 pp., $39.99 Paper.","authors":"J. Money","doi":"10.1017/rep.2022.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"prioritized by Black and Latino Americans. These groups are not equally engaged in giving testimony across all issue priorities, though, with Black advocacy groups devoting most of their participation in committee hearings to civil rights issues, while Latino advocacy groups focus on immigration, education, and economic policy. Minta argues, however, that this specialization does not constitute a representational deficit. Instead, civil rights organizations are supplemented in their advocacy by Black and Latino members of Congress, often testifying themselves on a much broader range of issues impacting Black and Latino Americans. A repeated caveat throughout the book is the negative impact that political polarization has on legislative advocacy opportunities. The corresponding trends of increasing polarization and increasing incorporation of Black and Latino advocacy organizations into the Democratic Party agenda raises real questions about the future effectiveness of these groups if their access is contingent upon single-party control. The book gives some brief thoughts on these developments and the future of civil rights advocacy in the age of hashtags and Internet activism but is generally noncommittal on predicting what their effects will be. This leaves a tantalizing assortment of loose ends for future researchers to explore, to carry the thesis into the present and beyond. This surprising thin volume accomplishes a great deal and should be read not just by scholars with an interest in racial and ethnic politics or interest groups but by anyone seeking a better understanding of legislative advocacy and civil rights history. Minta offers a creative exploration of the nonlinear path that effective legislative advocacy can take, with an impressive richness of historical detail. His book moves beyond the common wisdom and makes an innovative contribution to our understanding of how successful organizations can change and adapt to achieve their goals.","PeriodicalId":37190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","volume":"83 1","pages":"597 - 599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2022.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

prioritized by Black and Latino Americans. These groups are not equally engaged in giving testimony across all issue priorities, though, with Black advocacy groups devoting most of their participation in committee hearings to civil rights issues, while Latino advocacy groups focus on immigration, education, and economic policy. Minta argues, however, that this specialization does not constitute a representational deficit. Instead, civil rights organizations are supplemented in their advocacy by Black and Latino members of Congress, often testifying themselves on a much broader range of issues impacting Black and Latino Americans. A repeated caveat throughout the book is the negative impact that political polarization has on legislative advocacy opportunities. The corresponding trends of increasing polarization and increasing incorporation of Black and Latino advocacy organizations into the Democratic Party agenda raises real questions about the future effectiveness of these groups if their access is contingent upon single-party control. The book gives some brief thoughts on these developments and the future of civil rights advocacy in the age of hashtags and Internet activism but is generally noncommittal on predicting what their effects will be. This leaves a tantalizing assortment of loose ends for future researchers to explore, to carry the thesis into the present and beyond. This surprising thin volume accomplishes a great deal and should be read not just by scholars with an interest in racial and ethnic politics or interest groups but by anyone seeking a better understanding of legislative advocacy and civil rights history. Minta offers a creative exploration of the nonlinear path that effective legislative advocacy can take, with an impressive richness of historical detail. His book moves beyond the common wisdom and makes an innovative contribution to our understanding of how successful organizations can change and adapt to achieve their goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民的比较政治学。《德国、加拿大、瑞士和美国的政策选择》作者:安特杰·埃勒曼。剑桥比较政治学研究系列。纽约:剑桥大学出版社,2021。435页,39.99美元。
黑人和拉丁裔美国人优先考虑。然而,这些团体并不是平等地参与所有优先事项的证词,黑人倡导团体在委员会听证会上的大部分参与都是关于民权问题的,而拉丁裔倡导团体则专注于移民、教育和经济政策。然而,明塔认为,这种专业化并不构成代表性缺陷。相反,民权组织的倡导得到了国会黑人和拉丁裔议员的补充,他们经常就影响黑人和拉丁裔美国人的更广泛的问题作证。贯穿全书的反复告诫是政治两极分化对立法倡导机会的负面影响。相应的两极分化趋势日益加剧,黑人和拉丁裔倡导组织越来越多地纳入民主党的议程,如果这些组织的进入取决于一党控制,那么这些组织未来的有效性就会受到真正的质疑。这本书对这些发展以及在标签和互联网激进主义时代的民权倡导的未来做了一些简要的思考,但总体上没有明确预测它们将会产生什么影响。这就给未来的研究人员留下了一个诱人的空白,让他们去探索,把论文带到现在和以后。这本令人惊讶的薄卷成就了很多,不仅对种族和民族政治或利益集团感兴趣的学者应该阅读,而且任何寻求更好地理解立法倡导和民权历史的人都应该阅读。明塔对有效的立法倡导可以采取的非线性路径进行了创造性的探索,并提供了令人印象深刻的丰富的历史细节。他的书超越了普遍的智慧,对我们理解成功的组织如何改变和适应以实现其目标做出了创新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Responsiveness to Coethnics and Cominorities: Evidence from an Audit Experiment of State Legislators Introduction to the Final 2023 Issue The Advantage of Disadvantage: Costly Protest and Legislative Responsiveness By LaGina Gause, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022 Counting the State: State Resistance and Federal Enumeration of Latinos 1930–1970 Anger, Fear, and the Racialization of News Media Coverage of Protest Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1