Evaluating methods for controlling feral cats that minimise non-target impacts at Taunton National Park (Scientific)

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecological Management & Restoration Pub Date : 2021-12-04 DOI:10.1111/emr.12536
John Augusteyn, Barry Nolan
{"title":"Evaluating methods for controlling feral cats that minimise non-target impacts at Taunton National Park (Scientific)","authors":"John Augusteyn,&nbsp;Barry Nolan","doi":"10.1111/emr.12536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Feral Cat (<i>Felis catus</i>) (cat) is a predator of the Bridled Nail-Tailed Wallaby (BNTW) (<i>Onychogalea frenata</i>) living at Taunton National Park (Scientific) (Taunton). The aim of this study was to determine if traps and poison baits could be used to control feral cats without impacting non-target species at Taunton. The techniques trialled included poison fresh meat baits and several types of traps presented in different ways and with various lures. Thirty-one percent of fresh meat baits was taken during bait uptake trials; corvids removed 40% of these and dogs removed 16%. Cats were not detected, on camera traps, taking a bait. The elevated soft-jaw traps (81 trap nights/cat) and single-entry cage traps (98 trap nights/cat) were found to be the most successful of all the trap types trialled and had low amounts of by-catch. Other trap types trialled took more than 166 trap nights to catch a cat. The elevated soft-jaw trap configurations had the lowest amount of by-catch (avg. 0.33%), and the log trap had the highest amount of by-catch (1%). Ground-set traps successfully trapped cats (305 trap nights/cat) but caught more by-catch (0.9%) compared to the elevated soft-jaw trap types and most wallabies caught in these traps had to be euthanised.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 1","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Feral Cat (Felis catus) (cat) is a predator of the Bridled Nail-Tailed Wallaby (BNTW) (Onychogalea frenata) living at Taunton National Park (Scientific) (Taunton). The aim of this study was to determine if traps and poison baits could be used to control feral cats without impacting non-target species at Taunton. The techniques trialled included poison fresh meat baits and several types of traps presented in different ways and with various lures. Thirty-one percent of fresh meat baits was taken during bait uptake trials; corvids removed 40% of these and dogs removed 16%. Cats were not detected, on camera traps, taking a bait. The elevated soft-jaw traps (81 trap nights/cat) and single-entry cage traps (98 trap nights/cat) were found to be the most successful of all the trap types trialled and had low amounts of by-catch. Other trap types trialled took more than 166 trap nights to catch a cat. The elevated soft-jaw trap configurations had the lowest amount of by-catch (avg. 0.33%), and the log trap had the highest amount of by-catch (1%). Ground-set traps successfully trapped cats (305 trap nights/cat) but caught more by-catch (0.9%) compared to the elevated soft-jaw trap types and most wallabies caught in these traps had to be euthanised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估控制野猫的方法,以尽量减少对汤顿国家公园的非目标影响(科学)
野猫(Felis catus)(猫)是生活在陶顿国家公园(科学)(陶顿)的有笼头甲尾小袋鼠(BNTW) (Onychogalea frenata)的捕食者。本研究的目的是确定陷阱和毒饵是否可以用来控制野猫而不影响汤顿的非目标物种。试验的技术包括有毒的鲜肉诱饵和几种以不同方式和不同诱饵呈现的陷阱。在吸饵试验中,鲜肉饵的吸收率为31%;鸦去除了其中的40%,狗去除了16%。猫没有被发现,在相机陷阱上,吃诱饵。高架软颚式捕鼠器(81个捕鼠夜/只猫)和单入口笼式捕鼠器(98个捕鼠夜/只猫)是所有试验过的捕鼠器中最成功的,副渔获量也很低。其他类型的陷阱需要超过166个晚上才能捕捉到一只猫。抬高型软颚捕集器副渔获量最低(平均0.33%),log型捕集器副渔获量最高(1%)。地面设置的陷阱成功捕获了猫(305个陷阱夜/只猫),但与抬高的软颚陷阱类型相比,捕获了更多的副捕获物(0.9%),并且在这些陷阱中捕获的大多数小袋鼠不得不被安乐死。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Habitat, Health and Recruitment of Two Critically Endangered Eucalyptus Species—E. yarraensis and E. StrzeleckIi—in Southeastern Australia Leachate From the River Red Gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Dehn.) Litter Inhibits the Germination and Subsequent Growth of Wetland Macrophytes Spatial Modelling of Miconia calvescens Invasion Risk in North Queensland Rainforests to Refine Surveillance Planning Independent Review of Direct Seeding Techniques to Restore Grassy Woodland: Five Case Studies on the Cumberland Plain Movement and Degradation of Meat Baits by Birds and Ants in an Arid Australian Landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1