Quantification of air leakage paths: a comparison of airflow and acoustic measurements

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Ventilation Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI:10.1080/14733315.2021.1966576
Benedikt Kölsch, I. Walker, Björn Schiricke, W. Delp, B. Hoffschmidt
{"title":"Quantification of air leakage paths: a comparison of airflow and acoustic measurements","authors":"Benedikt Kölsch, I. Walker, Björn Schiricke, W. Delp, B. Hoffschmidt","doi":"10.1080/14733315.2021.1966576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Today, the fan pressurization method is the most frequently used method to evaluate a building's airtightness. However, the localization and quantification of leaks remain difficult. In this paper, an acoustic method is introduced to estimate the leakage size of single leaks. Acoustic and airflow measurements were conducted and compared in laboratory tests within the same boundary conditions. This work aims to investigate if various leak sizes can be predicted using acoustic measurement methods. The test apparatus consists of two chambers, separated by a test wall. This wall represents a single characteristic air leakage path. Various types of wall structures with different slit geometries, wall thicknesses, and insulation materials were investigated. The acoustic measurements were performed with a sound source placed in one chamber and ultrasonic microphones located in both chambers. These results were compared to measured airflows through the test wall to provide estimates of uncertainty in the acoustic approach, which indicate a linear trend. Finally, these laboratory measurements were compared to the same measurements at a real office building. Although the acoustic measurement uncertainty is still significant (greater than +/- 50%), the acoustic method has the potential to give an order of magnitude of single leak sizes.","PeriodicalId":55613,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ventilation","volume":"30 1","pages":"101 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14733315.2021.1966576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Today, the fan pressurization method is the most frequently used method to evaluate a building's airtightness. However, the localization and quantification of leaks remain difficult. In this paper, an acoustic method is introduced to estimate the leakage size of single leaks. Acoustic and airflow measurements were conducted and compared in laboratory tests within the same boundary conditions. This work aims to investigate if various leak sizes can be predicted using acoustic measurement methods. The test apparatus consists of two chambers, separated by a test wall. This wall represents a single characteristic air leakage path. Various types of wall structures with different slit geometries, wall thicknesses, and insulation materials were investigated. The acoustic measurements were performed with a sound source placed in one chamber and ultrasonic microphones located in both chambers. These results were compared to measured airflows through the test wall to provide estimates of uncertainty in the acoustic approach, which indicate a linear trend. Finally, these laboratory measurements were compared to the same measurements at a real office building. Although the acoustic measurement uncertainty is still significant (greater than +/- 50%), the acoustic method has the potential to give an order of magnitude of single leak sizes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空气泄漏路径的量化:气流和声学测量的比较
摘要风机增压法是目前评价建筑物气密性最常用的方法。然而,泄漏的定位和量化仍然很困难。本文介绍了一种声学方法来估计单次泄漏的泄漏大小。在相同的边界条件下进行了声学和气流测量,并在实验室测试中进行了比较。这项工作旨在研究是否可以使用声学测量方法预测各种泄漏大小。试验装置由两个由试验壁隔开的腔室组成。这面墙代表了一个单一的特征空气泄漏路径。研究了具有不同狭缝几何形状、壁厚和保温材料的各种类型的壁结构。声学测量是用一个声源放置在一个腔室,超声波麦克风位于两个腔室。将这些结果与通过测试壁的测量气流进行比较,以提供声学方法不确定性的估计,这表明线性趋势。最后,将这些实验室测量结果与实际办公大楼的相同测量结果进行比较。尽管声学测量的不确定性仍然很大(大于+/- 50%),但声学方法有可能给出单个泄漏大小的数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Ventilation
International Journal of Ventilation CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is a peer reviewed journal aimed at providing the latest information on research and application. Topics include: • New ideas concerned with the development or application of ventilation; • Validated case studies demonstrating the performance of ventilation strategies; • Information on needs and solutions for specific building types including: offices, dwellings, schools, hospitals, parking garages, urban buildings and recreational buildings etc; • Developments in numerical methods; • Measurement techniques; • Related issues in which the impact of ventilation plays an important role (e.g. the interaction of ventilation with air quality, health and comfort); • Energy issues related to ventilation (e.g. low energy systems, ventilation heating and cooling loss); • Driving forces (weather data, fan performance etc).
期刊最新文献
Assessing thermal resilience to overheating in a Belgian apartment: impact of building parameters Passive ventilation for building not subjected to solar radiation Experimental study on the periodic pulsating ventilation by fluidic oscillator on pollutant dispersion and ventilation performance in enclosed environment Compartmentalization and ventilation system impacts on air and contaminant transport for multifamily buildings Controllable baffle-type exhaust-hood in home kitchen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1