Towards a Recommender System-based Process for Managing Risks in Scrum Projects

IF 0.4 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Applied Computing Review Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1145/3555776.3577748
Ademar França de Sousa Neto, F. Ramos, D. Albuquerque, Emanuel Dantas, M. Perkusich, H. Almeida, A. Perkusich
{"title":"Towards a Recommender System-based Process for Managing Risks in Scrum Projects","authors":"Ademar França de Sousa Neto, F. Ramos, D. Albuquerque, Emanuel Dantas, M. Perkusich, H. Almeida, A. Perkusich","doi":"10.1145/3555776.3577748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile Software Development (ASD) implicitly manages risks through, for example, its short development cycles (i.e., iterations). The absence of explicit risk management activities in ASD might be problematic since this approach cannot handle all types of risks, might cause risks (e.g., technical debt), and does not promote knowledge reuse throughout an organization. Thus, there is a need to bring discipline to agile risk management. This study focuses on bringing such discipline to organizations that conduct multiple projects to develop software products using ASD, specifically, the Scrum framework, which is the most popular way of adopting ASD. For this purpose, we developed a novel solution that was articulated in partnership with an industry partner. It is a process to complement the Scrum framework to use a recommender system that recommends risks and response plans for a target project, given the risks registered for similar projects in an organization's risk memory (i.e., database). We evaluated the feasibility of the proposed recommender system solution using pre-collected datasets from 17 projects from our industry partner. Since we used the KNN algorithm, we focused on finding the best configuration of k (i.e., the number of neighbors) and the similarity measure. As a result, the configuration with the best results had k = 6 (i.e., six neighbors) and used the Manhattan similarity measure, achieving precision = 45%; recall = 90%; and F1-score = 58%. The results show that the proposed recommender system can assist Scrum Teams in identifying risks and response plans, and it is promising to aid decision-making in Scrum-based projects. Thus, we concluded that our proposed recommender system-based risk management process is promising for helping Scrum Teams address risks more efficiently.","PeriodicalId":42971,"journal":{"name":"Applied Computing Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Computing Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3555776.3577748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agile Software Development (ASD) implicitly manages risks through, for example, its short development cycles (i.e., iterations). The absence of explicit risk management activities in ASD might be problematic since this approach cannot handle all types of risks, might cause risks (e.g., technical debt), and does not promote knowledge reuse throughout an organization. Thus, there is a need to bring discipline to agile risk management. This study focuses on bringing such discipline to organizations that conduct multiple projects to develop software products using ASD, specifically, the Scrum framework, which is the most popular way of adopting ASD. For this purpose, we developed a novel solution that was articulated in partnership with an industry partner. It is a process to complement the Scrum framework to use a recommender system that recommends risks and response plans for a target project, given the risks registered for similar projects in an organization's risk memory (i.e., database). We evaluated the feasibility of the proposed recommender system solution using pre-collected datasets from 17 projects from our industry partner. Since we used the KNN algorithm, we focused on finding the best configuration of k (i.e., the number of neighbors) and the similarity measure. As a result, the configuration with the best results had k = 6 (i.e., six neighbors) and used the Manhattan similarity measure, achieving precision = 45%; recall = 90%; and F1-score = 58%. The results show that the proposed recommender system can assist Scrum Teams in identifying risks and response plans, and it is promising to aid decision-making in Scrum-based projects. Thus, we concluded that our proposed recommender system-based risk management process is promising for helping Scrum Teams address risks more efficiently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于推荐系统的Scrum项目风险管理流程
例如,敏捷软件开发(ASD)通过其短的开发周期(即迭代)隐含地管理风险。在ASD中缺乏明确的风险管理活动可能是有问题的,因为这种方法不能处理所有类型的风险,可能导致风险(例如,技术债务),并且不能促进整个组织中的知识重用。因此,有必要给敏捷风险管理带来纪律。本研究的重点是将这样的规则引入到使用ASD开发软件产品的多个项目的组织中,特别是Scrum框架,这是采用ASD的最流行的方式。为此,我们开发了一种新颖的解决方案,该解决方案是与行业合作伙伴合作提出的。这是一个补充Scrum框架的过程,使用推荐系统,根据组织风险记忆(即数据库)中类似项目的风险,为目标项目推荐风险和响应计划。我们使用我们的行业合作伙伴从17个项目中预先收集的数据集评估了建议的推荐系统解决方案的可行性。由于我们使用了KNN算法,我们专注于寻找k的最佳配置(即邻居的数量)和相似性度量。结果表明,k = 6(即6个邻居)的最佳配置使用曼哈顿相似性度量,精度为45%;召回率= 90%;F1-score = 58%。结果表明,建议的推荐系统可以帮助Scrum团队识别风险和响应计划,并且有望在基于Scrum的项目中帮助决策。因此,我们得出结论,我们建议的基于系统的风险管理流程有望帮助Scrum团队更有效地处理风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Computing Review
Applied Computing Review COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
DIWS-LCR-Rot-hop++: A Domain-Independent Word Selector for Cross-Domain Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification Leveraging Semantic Technologies for Collaborative Inference of Threatening IoT Dependencies Relating Optimal Repairs in Ontology Engineering with Contraction Operations in Belief Change Block-RACS: Towards Reputation-Aware Client Selection and Monetization Mechanism for Federated Learning Elastic Data Binning: Time-Series Sketching for Time-Domain Astrophysics Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1