Systematic analysis of injection-site pain and reactions caused by subcutaneous administration of the adalimumab biosimilar FKB327 versus the adalimumab reference product via different delivery methods

Pub Date : 2020-09-15 DOI:10.5639/gabij.2020.0903.019
R. Alten, H. Kellner, M. Boyce, Takuma Yonemura, Takahiro Ito, M. Genovese
{"title":"Systematic analysis of injection-site pain and reactions caused by subcutaneous\n administration of the adalimumab biosimilar FKB327 versus the adalimumab reference\n product via different delivery methods","authors":"R. Alten, H. Kellner, M. Boyce, Takuma Yonemura, Takahiro Ito, M. Genovese","doi":"10.5639/gabij.2020.0903.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Study objectives: FKB327 is a biosimilar of the adalimumab reference\n product. Studies in healthy subjects and patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated\n biosimilarity between FKB327 and the reference product in safety profile, efficacy and\n immunogenicity. FKB327 formulation excipients differ from the citrate-containing\n formulation of the reference product, and injection-site pain differences have been\n reported. The current analysis examines pooled data to assess the amount of\n injection-site pain resulting from injecting FKB327 using a prefilled syringe,\n autoinjector, or vial/syringe versus the reference product. Methods: Data from four\n studies were pooled to compare injection-site pain upon subcutaneous administration of\n FKB327 versus the reference product. Pooled data were analysed to compare FKB327 with\n the reference product and to compare the autoinjector, pre-filled syringe and\n vial/syringe. Results: Data were analysed from 2007 assessments in 1,001 subjects. A\n linear mixed model of the injection-site pain visual analogue scale score across all\n studies showed a 12.6-point lower pain score for FKB327 versus the reference product\n (95% confidence interval, –14.3 to –10.8; p > 0.001). The autoinjector pain score was\n 4.4 points lower than the vial/syringe (95% confidence interval, –5.9 to –2.8; p >\n 0.001) and 1.7 points lower than the pre-filled syringe (95% confidence interval, –3.3\n to –0.1; p = 0.035). No statistically significant differences were identified for\n gender, age, body weight, needle gauge, or injection site. Conclusion: FKB327 showed\n less injection-site pain compared with the reference product. No statistically\n significant differences were seen in injection-site reactions or related adverse events\n between FKB327 and the reference product or among FKB327 injection methods.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5639/gabij.2020.0903.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction/Study objectives: FKB327 is a biosimilar of the adalimumab reference product. Studies in healthy subjects and patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated biosimilarity between FKB327 and the reference product in safety profile, efficacy and immunogenicity. FKB327 formulation excipients differ from the citrate-containing formulation of the reference product, and injection-site pain differences have been reported. The current analysis examines pooled data to assess the amount of injection-site pain resulting from injecting FKB327 using a prefilled syringe, autoinjector, or vial/syringe versus the reference product. Methods: Data from four studies were pooled to compare injection-site pain upon subcutaneous administration of FKB327 versus the reference product. Pooled data were analysed to compare FKB327 with the reference product and to compare the autoinjector, pre-filled syringe and vial/syringe. Results: Data were analysed from 2007 assessments in 1,001 subjects. A linear mixed model of the injection-site pain visual analogue scale score across all studies showed a 12.6-point lower pain score for FKB327 versus the reference product (95% confidence interval, –14.3 to –10.8; p > 0.001). The autoinjector pain score was 4.4 points lower than the vial/syringe (95% confidence interval, –5.9 to –2.8; p > 0.001) and 1.7 points lower than the pre-filled syringe (95% confidence interval, –3.3 to –0.1; p = 0.035). No statistically significant differences were identified for gender, age, body weight, needle gauge, or injection site. Conclusion: FKB327 showed less injection-site pain compared with the reference product. No statistically significant differences were seen in injection-site reactions or related adverse events between FKB327 and the reference product or among FKB327 injection methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
系统分析阿达木单抗生物仿制药FKB327与阿达木单抗参考产品通过不同给药方式皮下给药引起的注射部位疼痛和反应
FKB327是阿达木单抗参考产品的生物仿制药。对健康受试者和类风湿性关节炎患者的研究表明,FKB327与参比产品在安全性、有效性和免疫原性方面具有生物相似性。FKB327制剂辅料不同于参比制剂中含有柠檬酸盐的制剂,注射部位疼痛差异已被报道。目前的分析检查了汇总的数据,以评估使用预充注射器、自动注射器或小瓶/注射器注射FKB327与参考产品注射时引起的注射部位疼痛的程度。方法:汇集了四项研究的数据,比较FKB327皮下给药与对照产品的注射部位疼痛。对合并数据进行分析,比较FKB327与参比产品,并比较自动进样器、预充式注射器和小瓶/注射器。结果:分析了2007年1001名受试者的评估数据。所有研究的注射部位疼痛视觉模拟量表评分的线性混合模型显示,与参考产品相比,FKB327的疼痛评分低12.6分(95%置信区间,-14.3至-10.8;P > 0.001)。自动注射器疼痛评分比小瓶/注射器低4.4分(95%置信区间,-5.9 ~ -2.8;P > 0.001),比预充注射器低1.7点(95%置信区间,-3.3 ~ -0.1;P = 0.035)。性别、年龄、体重、针规或注射部位没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:与参比品相比,FKB327的注射部位疼痛减轻。FKB327注射部位反应或相关不良事件在FKB327与参比产品或FKB327注射方式之间无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1