Explaining the Minority Status Hypothesis: Development of the Cultural Resilience Life Stress Paradigm

A. Paul
{"title":"Explaining the Minority Status Hypothesis: Development of the Cultural Resilience Life Stress Paradigm","authors":"A. Paul","doi":"10.23937/2572-4037.1510030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews recent empirical studies (N = 13) that focused on two cultural resources (spirituality and racial identity) utilized by African-Americans to cope with stress in an attempt to: 1) Provide some explanations why the minority status hypothesis is unfounded in most epidemiologic community surveys; and 2) Develop a theoretical framework that explicates this phenomenon. The review shows that both spirituality and racial identity reduced the negative impact of life stressors while producing positive effects on African-Americans’ well-being whereby affecting their mental health status. The findings allow the authors to build upon the existing life stress paradigm to produce a theoretical framework, The Cultural Resilience Life Stress Paradigm, which illustrates the life stress-distress pathway to mental health status revealed by the literature. This theoretical framework intends to increase understanding about cultural resources as a basic premise for improving and enhancing mental health promoting programs’ policies and practices. ic status [6]; and exposure to [7]. While these correlations should work to substantiate a minority status hypothesis, findings from five epidemiologic community surveys-the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study [8]; the National Comorbidity Survey [9]; the National Survey of American Life [10]; the National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions, 2001-2002 [11] and the 2008 National Health Interview Survey [12] present the minority mental health status dilemma. These five national studies indicate that the mental health status of African-Americans is comparable to, and possibly better than, those of Whites. Further, independent of the relative health of African Americans, this racial group’s mental health status is better than might be expected based on the prevalence of stressors alone. The disproportionate rate of stress and the lower than expected rates of mental disorders among African-Americans has raised a number of questions regarding the cultural factors related to their mental health. African-American cultural coping Culture influences mental health status and seems to play a role in how people cope with stressors [13]. Although African-Americans are exposed to more stressors than Whites, they take an active role in dealing with stressors rather than avoiding them [14]. African Americans appraise stressful situations as changeable more frequently than Whites [15] and are more likely than Whites to engage in healthy coping skills [16]. In an attempt at identifying the coping capacity of African-Americans, Edwards [17] conducted a qualitative Review ARticle","PeriodicalId":91098,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4037.1510030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper reviews recent empirical studies (N = 13) that focused on two cultural resources (spirituality and racial identity) utilized by African-Americans to cope with stress in an attempt to: 1) Provide some explanations why the minority status hypothesis is unfounded in most epidemiologic community surveys; and 2) Develop a theoretical framework that explicates this phenomenon. The review shows that both spirituality and racial identity reduced the negative impact of life stressors while producing positive effects on African-Americans’ well-being whereby affecting their mental health status. The findings allow the authors to build upon the existing life stress paradigm to produce a theoretical framework, The Cultural Resilience Life Stress Paradigm, which illustrates the life stress-distress pathway to mental health status revealed by the literature. This theoretical framework intends to increase understanding about cultural resources as a basic premise for improving and enhancing mental health promoting programs’ policies and practices. ic status [6]; and exposure to [7]. While these correlations should work to substantiate a minority status hypothesis, findings from five epidemiologic community surveys-the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study [8]; the National Comorbidity Survey [9]; the National Survey of American Life [10]; the National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions, 2001-2002 [11] and the 2008 National Health Interview Survey [12] present the minority mental health status dilemma. These five national studies indicate that the mental health status of African-Americans is comparable to, and possibly better than, those of Whites. Further, independent of the relative health of African Americans, this racial group’s mental health status is better than might be expected based on the prevalence of stressors alone. The disproportionate rate of stress and the lower than expected rates of mental disorders among African-Americans has raised a number of questions regarding the cultural factors related to their mental health. African-American cultural coping Culture influences mental health status and seems to play a role in how people cope with stressors [13]. Although African-Americans are exposed to more stressors than Whites, they take an active role in dealing with stressors rather than avoiding them [14]. African Americans appraise stressful situations as changeable more frequently than Whites [15] and are more likely than Whites to engage in healthy coping skills [16]. In an attempt at identifying the coping capacity of African-Americans, Edwards [17] conducted a qualitative Review ARticle
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释少数民族地位假说:文化弹性生活压力范式的发展
本文回顾了近期关于非裔美国人应对压力的两种文化资源(精神和种族认同)的实证研究(N = 13),试图:1)提供一些解释,为什么少数民族地位假说在大多数流行病学社区调查中是没有根据的;2)建立一个解释这一现象的理论框架。研究表明,灵性和种族认同都能减少生活压力源的负面影响,同时对非裔美国人的幸福感产生积极影响,从而影响他们的心理健康状况。研究结果允许作者在现有的生活压力范式的基础上建立一个理论框架,即文化弹性生活压力范式,该范式说明了文献揭示的生活压力-痛苦通往心理健康状态的途径。这一理论框架旨在增加对文化资源的理解,作为改善和加强心理健康促进项目政策和实践的基本前提。IC状态[6];和暴露于[7]。虽然这些相关性应该可以证实少数民族地位假说,但五项流行病学社区调查的结果——国家精神卫生研究所流行病学集水区研究[8];全国合并症调查[9];美国国家生活调查[10];2001-2002年全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查[11]和2008年全国健康访谈调查[12]显示了少数民族心理健康状况的困境。这五项全国性研究表明,非裔美国人的心理健康状况与白人相当,甚至可能比白人更好。此外,与非裔美国人的相对健康状况无关,该种族群体的心理健康状况比仅根据压力源的流行程度所预期的要好。在非裔美国人中,不成比例的压力率和低于预期的精神障碍率引发了一些关于与他们的精神健康相关的文化因素的问题。文化影响心理健康状况,并似乎在人们如何应对压力源中发挥作用[13]。尽管非裔美国人比白人暴露于更多的压力源,但他们在处理压力源方面表现得更为积极,而不是回避压力源[14]。非裔美国人比白人更频繁地认为压力情境是多变的[15],也比白人更有可能采取健康的应对技巧[16]。为了确定非裔美国人的应对能力,Edwards[17]进行了一篇定性的综述文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT (Generated Pre-Trained Transformer) As an Adjunct to Mental Health Interventions: A Commentary Sexuality in Endometriosis: Preliminary Data on Pain Malevolence and Illness Intrusiveness Psychological Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation - A Review The Relationship between Personality Traits and Effectiveness of Ethiopian Athletes in Long Distance Running The Predictive Effect of Cognitive Flexibility and Probability Knowledge on Probability Category Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1