Evaluation of IgG Neutralizing Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Among Healthcare Workers Who Frequently Encountered COVID-19 Patients in Our Hospital

Hasan Yeşilağaç, H. Alışkan, H. Gümüş, İ. Ödemiş, Zuhal EKİCİ ÜNSAL
{"title":"Evaluation of IgG Neutralizing Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Among Healthcare Workers Who Frequently Encountered COVID-19 Patients in Our Hospital","authors":"Hasan Yeşilağaç, H. Alışkan, H. Gümüş, İ. Ödemiş, Zuhal EKİCİ ÜNSAL","doi":"10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2021.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Since the Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) first emerged in Wuhan, on 12 December 2019, it has spread rapidly across the world and developed into a pandemic. As healthcare workers are frequently in contact with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients, they can be affected more often than the general population. In this study we aimed to investigate the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and the IgG antibody levels among healthcare workers who frequently encountered COVID-19 patients in our hospital.Materials and Methods: In total, 182 healthcare workers were identified from database and their data was retrospectively analyzed. Participants with previous PCR positivity, pregnant, autoimmune disease history or immunosuppressive treatment history were excluded. Participants were grouped depending on their frequency of contact with COVID-19 patients (high and medium risk). All the samples were tested simultaneously for anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies by the ELISA method. A chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A t-test and an ANOVA test were carried out to where appropriate.Results: Serological testing of 182 HCWs exposed to SARS-CoV-2 patients illustrated that 13.2% of them (24 out of 182) might have experienced an asymptomatic or subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infection. High risk participants, anosmia, and ageusia were statistically significant risk factors. The rate of detection of antibody positivity among doctors (p=0.030) and patients with anosmia, and ageusia (p=0.047) were found significantly higher than the others. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 antibody ratio results were found significantly higher in the groups of high risk participants (p=0.046), patients with clinical signs (p=0.008), myalgia (p=0.039), anosmia, and ageusia (p=0.025), respectively.Conclusion: Our study showed that serological testing is useful for determining asymptomatic or subclinical infections prevelance of SARS-CoV-2 among those with close contact with COVID-19 patients. Serological tests can be helpful determining the prevelance COVID-19 infection, especially among the HCWs.","PeriodicalId":53879,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2021.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Since the Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) first emerged in Wuhan, on 12 December 2019, it has spread rapidly across the world and developed into a pandemic. As healthcare workers are frequently in contact with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients, they can be affected more often than the general population. In this study we aimed to investigate the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and the IgG antibody levels among healthcare workers who frequently encountered COVID-19 patients in our hospital.Materials and Methods: In total, 182 healthcare workers were identified from database and their data was retrospectively analyzed. Participants with previous PCR positivity, pregnant, autoimmune disease history or immunosuppressive treatment history were excluded. Participants were grouped depending on their frequency of contact with COVID-19 patients (high and medium risk). All the samples were tested simultaneously for anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG antibodies by the ELISA method. A chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A t-test and an ANOVA test were carried out to where appropriate.Results: Serological testing of 182 HCWs exposed to SARS-CoV-2 patients illustrated that 13.2% of them (24 out of 182) might have experienced an asymptomatic or subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infection. High risk participants, anosmia, and ageusia were statistically significant risk factors. The rate of detection of antibody positivity among doctors (p=0.030) and patients with anosmia, and ageusia (p=0.047) were found significantly higher than the others. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 antibody ratio results were found significantly higher in the groups of high risk participants (p=0.046), patients with clinical signs (p=0.008), myalgia (p=0.039), anosmia, and ageusia (p=0.025), respectively.Conclusion: Our study showed that serological testing is useful for determining asymptomatic or subclinical infections prevelance of SARS-CoV-2 among those with close contact with COVID-19 patients. Serological tests can be helpful determining the prevelance COVID-19 infection, especially among the HCWs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我院常见于COVID-19患者的医护人员SARS-CoV-2 IgG中和抗体检测
自2019年12月12日在武汉首次出现严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)以来,该病毒已在全球迅速传播并发展为大流行。由于医护人员经常接触2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者,他们比一般人群更容易受到影响。在本研究中,我们旨在调查在我院经常接触COVID-19患者的医护人员的SARS-CoV-2血清阳性率和IgG抗体水平。材料与方法:从数据库中选取182名医护人员,对其资料进行回顾性分析。既往PCR阳性、怀孕、自身免疫性疾病史或免疫抑制治疗史的参与者被排除在外。参与者根据他们与COVID-19患者接触的频率(高风险和中等风险)进行分组。采用ELISA法同时检测所有样本的sars - cov -2- igg抗体。分类变量的比较采用卡方检验。在适当的地方进行t检验和方差分析检验。结果:182名接触SARS-CoV-2患者的医护人员的血清学检测显示,其中13.2%(182人中24人)可能经历了无症状或亚临床SARS-CoV-2感染。高风险参与者、嗅觉缺失和老年痴呆是统计学上显著的危险因素。抗体阳性检出率在医生(p=0.030)和嗅觉缺失、老年痴呆患者(p=0.047)中显著高于其他人群。此外,SARS-CoV-2抗体比结果在高危组(p=0.046)、临床症状组(p=0.008)、肌痛组(p=0.039)、嗅觉缺失组和老年组(p=0.025)中分别显著升高。结论:血清学检测有助于确定与COVID-19患者密切接触者中SARS-CoV-2无症状或亚临床感染的流行率。血清学检测有助于确定COVID-19感染的流行率,特别是在卫生保健工作者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changing Infection Dynamics with the Pandemic: Distribution of Viral Agents of Respiratory Tract Infections in the Last 5 Years The Outcomes of Direct-acting Antiviral Treatment in 177 Patients with Hepatitis C Virus: A single-center Experience Septik Artritin Nadir Nedeni: Salmonella Group B Streptococcus Carriage in Pregnancy: The Burden of Early-onset Neonatal Disease and Estimation of the Cost of Universal Antenatal Screening in a Hospital of the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia Effect of Colchicine on Secondaryacute Lung Injury in an Experimental Rat Sepsis Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1