Fungal Coinfections in COVID-19-Positive Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia

A. Elsawy, K. Al-Quthami, Hamdi M. Al-Said, R. Allam, Abdulmoin Al-Qarni, M. Shaikh, Yahya A. Alzahrani, H. Khan, Mawada Al-Kashkari
{"title":"Fungal Coinfections in COVID-19-Positive Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia","authors":"A. Elsawy, K. Al-Quthami, Hamdi M. Al-Said, R. Allam, Abdulmoin Al-Qarni, M. Shaikh, Yahya A. Alzahrani, H. Khan, Mawada Al-Kashkari","doi":"10.21608/ejmm.2022.249267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients present with mild or moderate severity of the disease. However, disease comorbidities may require mechanical ventilation and intensive care (IC), which predispose COVID-19 patients to secondary opportunistic fungal infections. Objective: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the relationship between fungal coinfections and morbidity and mortality rates in patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Methodology: This work was conducted on 1,220 patients with COVID-19 admitted to a Saudi Tertiary Care Hospital in Makkah city from June 1, 2020, to May 30, 2021, to evaluate the existence of fungal infections. COVID-19 cases were confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Statistical analysis was performed via SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, USA). Results: Of the 1,220 included samples, fungal coinfections were detected in 57 (4.7%) patients. Candida albicans was the major isolated strain in 39 (68.4%) patients, and the primary source of infection was sputum (40 patients: 70.2%). Most samples were isolated from the ICU (41 patients; 71.9%); bacteria coinfection was detected in 12 (21%) severely ill patients. Conclusion: Mindfulness of the plausibility of fungal coinfection is important to control infection and ultimately reduces the risk and the delay in diagnostic and treatment process. It will also guide the diagnostic tools in identifying high-risk patients and quickly determine the most appropriate interventions for reducing the possibility of infection besides morbidity and mortality rates.","PeriodicalId":22549,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2022.249267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Most coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients present with mild or moderate severity of the disease. However, disease comorbidities may require mechanical ventilation and intensive care (IC), which predispose COVID-19 patients to secondary opportunistic fungal infections. Objective: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the relationship between fungal coinfections and morbidity and mortality rates in patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Methodology: This work was conducted on 1,220 patients with COVID-19 admitted to a Saudi Tertiary Care Hospital in Makkah city from June 1, 2020, to May 30, 2021, to evaluate the existence of fungal infections. COVID-19 cases were confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Statistical analysis was performed via SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, USA). Results: Of the 1,220 included samples, fungal coinfections were detected in 57 (4.7%) patients. Candida albicans was the major isolated strain in 39 (68.4%) patients, and the primary source of infection was sputum (40 patients: 70.2%). Most samples were isolated from the ICU (41 patients; 71.9%); bacteria coinfection was detected in 12 (21%) severely ill patients. Conclusion: Mindfulness of the plausibility of fungal coinfection is important to control infection and ultimately reduces the risk and the delay in diagnostic and treatment process. It will also guide the diagnostic tools in identifying high-risk patients and quickly determine the most appropriate interventions for reducing the possibility of infection besides morbidity and mortality rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院covid -19阳性患者的真菌共感染
背景:大多数冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)患者表现为轻度或中度疾病。然而,疾病合并症可能需要机械通气和重症监护(IC),这使COVID-19患者易发生继发性机会性真菌感染。目的:通过观察性回顾性队列研究,探讨沙特阿拉伯麦加某三级医院重症COVID-19患者真菌合并感染与发病率和死亡率的关系。方法:本研究对2020年6月1日至2021年5月30日在沙特麦加市一家三级医院住院的1220例COVID-19患者进行了研究,以评估真菌感染的存在。采用实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)方法确诊病例。统计学分析采用SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, USA)。结果:在纳入的1220份样本中,57例(4.7%)患者检出真菌共感染。39例(68.4%)患者以白色念珠菌为主要分离菌,40例(70.2%)患者以痰液为主要感染源。大多数样本来自ICU(41例;71.9%);12例(21%)重症患者检出细菌共感染。结论:注意真菌合并感染的可能性对控制感染具有重要意义,最终降低感染风险,减少诊断和治疗过程的延误。它还将指导诊断工具识别高风险患者,并迅速确定除发病率和死亡率外减少感染可能性的最适当干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights into Biofilm-based Multidrug Resistance in Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolated from Patients Hospitalized in Benha University Intensive Care Unit Association between Dysbiosis of Key Species of Nasal Microbiome and Allergic Rhinitis in Adult Patients Invasive Versus Noninvasive Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori infection Detection of Vancomycin Resistance among Hospital and Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Biofilm Formation by Acinetobacter Species Isolated from Intensive Care Units: Unveiling the Impact on Antibiotic Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1