Should the Church Love the (God’s) World? A Response to the Cape Town Commitment Point Seven

Gregory S. Thellman
{"title":"Should the Church Love the (God’s) World? A Response to the Cape Town Commitment Point Seven","authors":"Gregory S. Thellman","doi":"10.32862/k.14.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a response to point seven, sub-points A) and B) of The Cape Town Commitment (TCTC), and attempts to answer the question “is love the proper Christian response to the nonhuman creation, and/or to human nations and culture?” Based on a summary of the concepts of “love” and the “world” in the biblical texts, it is shown that the biblical concept of “love” strongly emphasizes heartfelt and caring commitment for another within human relationships and divine-human relationships. The “world” in scripture can be construed in positive, neutral or negative senses, depending on the term and context, and Christians find themselves both in a fallen creation which awaits liberation and within human nations and cultures in a state of sin and rebellion against God. While the Bible never commands believers to love the nonhuman creation or collective human entities like nations and cultures, Christians may yet appropriate love for God and neighbor through their attentive care of creation and through their contribution to culture in a way that glorifies God. In these ways, Christians may “love” creation and culture, but only in a contingent sense with their foundational love focused on God and neighbor.","PeriodicalId":91167,"journal":{"name":"Revista Kairos : gerontologia","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Kairos : gerontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32862/k.14.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is a response to point seven, sub-points A) and B) of The Cape Town Commitment (TCTC), and attempts to answer the question “is love the proper Christian response to the nonhuman creation, and/or to human nations and culture?” Based on a summary of the concepts of “love” and the “world” in the biblical texts, it is shown that the biblical concept of “love” strongly emphasizes heartfelt and caring commitment for another within human relationships and divine-human relationships. The “world” in scripture can be construed in positive, neutral or negative senses, depending on the term and context, and Christians find themselves both in a fallen creation which awaits liberation and within human nations and cultures in a state of sin and rebellion against God. While the Bible never commands believers to love the nonhuman creation or collective human entities like nations and cultures, Christians may yet appropriate love for God and neighbor through their attentive care of creation and through their contribution to culture in a way that glorifies God. In these ways, Christians may “love” creation and culture, but only in a contingent sense with their foundational love focused on God and neighbor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教会应该爱(神的)世界吗?对开普敦承诺的回应第七点
本文是对开普敦承诺(The Cape Town Commitment, TCTC)第7点a)和B)的回应,并试图回答这个问题:“爱是基督徒对非人类创造物和/或人类国家和文化的正确回应吗?”通过对《圣经》文本中“爱”和“世界”概念的总结,表明《圣经》中的“爱”概念强烈强调在人际关系和神与人的关系中对另一个人发自内心和关怀的承诺。圣经中的“世界”可以根据术语和上下文有积极、中性或消极的含义,基督徒发现自己既处于等待解放的堕落创造中,又处于人类民族和文化中,处于罪恶和背叛上帝的状态。虽然圣经从来没有命令信徒去爱非人类的受造物,或像国家和文化这样的人类集体,但基督徒可以通过他们对受造物的细心照顾,以及通过他们对文化的贡献,以一种荣耀上帝的方式,来适当地爱上帝和邻舍。在这些方面,基督徒可能“爱”创造和文化,但只是在偶然的意义上,他们的基本爱集中在上帝和邻居身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theology of the Baptism in the Spirit and Gifts of the Spirit in the Thought of Martyn Lloyd-Jones and His Differences, Similarities, and Contributions in Comparison to Pentecostal Interpretation Teoza u učeništvu Fr. Silvije Grubišić, the Neglected Bible Translator “Different Kinds of Gospel Result In Different Kinds of Discipleship” “Different Kinds of Gospel Result In Different Kinds of Discipleship”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1