Studies on the second victim phenomenon and other related topics in the pan-European environment: The experience of ERNST Consortium members

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of patient safety and risk management Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.1177/25160435221076985
I. Carrillo, Susanna Tella, R. Strametz, K. Vanhaecht, M. Panella, S. Guerra-Paiva, Bojana Knezevic, M. Ungureanu, E. Srulovici, S. Buttigieg, P. Sousa, J. Mira
{"title":"Studies on the second victim phenomenon and other related topics in the pan-European environment: The experience of ERNST Consortium members","authors":"I. Carrillo, Susanna Tella, R. Strametz, K. Vanhaecht, M. Panella, S. Guerra-Paiva, Bojana Knezevic, M. Ungureanu, E. Srulovici, S. Buttigieg, P. Sousa, J. Mira","doi":"10.1177/25160435221076985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Patient safety is a priority worldwide. When things go wrong in the provision of patient care, the healthcare professionals involved can be psychologically affected (second victims, SVs). Recently, different initiatives have been launched to address this phenomenon. Aim To identify through the ERNST Pan-European Consortium the current study lines in Europe on SVs and other topics related to how the lack of well-being of healthcare professionals can affect the quality of care. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted based on an ad hoc online survey. All 82 academics and clinicians who had formalized their membership to the COST Action 19113 by September 2020 and represented 27 European and one neighboring country were invited to participate. The survey consisted of 19 questions that explored the participants’ scientific profile, their interests, and previous experiences in the SVs’ topic, and related areas of work in Europe. Results Seventy (85.4%) COST Action members responded to the survey. Thirty-seven (37.1%) had conducted SV studies in the past or were doing so at the moment of the survey. Seventeen participants were involved in implementing interventions to support SVs. Future lines of study included legal issues, open disclosure, training programs, and patient safety curricula. Conclusions Studies have been conducted in Europe on the magnitude of the SV phenomenon and the usefulness of some techniques to promote resilience among healthcare professionals. New gaps have been identified. The COST Action 19113 aims to foster European collaboration to reinforce the healthcare professionals’ well-being and thus contribute to patient safety.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"18 1","pages":"59 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435221076985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Patient safety is a priority worldwide. When things go wrong in the provision of patient care, the healthcare professionals involved can be psychologically affected (second victims, SVs). Recently, different initiatives have been launched to address this phenomenon. Aim To identify through the ERNST Pan-European Consortium the current study lines in Europe on SVs and other topics related to how the lack of well-being of healthcare professionals can affect the quality of care. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted based on an ad hoc online survey. All 82 academics and clinicians who had formalized their membership to the COST Action 19113 by September 2020 and represented 27 European and one neighboring country were invited to participate. The survey consisted of 19 questions that explored the participants’ scientific profile, their interests, and previous experiences in the SVs’ topic, and related areas of work in Europe. Results Seventy (85.4%) COST Action members responded to the survey. Thirty-seven (37.1%) had conducted SV studies in the past or were doing so at the moment of the survey. Seventeen participants were involved in implementing interventions to support SVs. Future lines of study included legal issues, open disclosure, training programs, and patient safety curricula. Conclusions Studies have been conducted in Europe on the magnitude of the SV phenomenon and the usefulness of some techniques to promote resilience among healthcare professionals. New gaps have been identified. The COST Action 19113 aims to foster European collaboration to reinforce the healthcare professionals’ well-being and thus contribute to patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泛欧环境下第二受害者现象及其他相关议题的研究:ERNST联盟成员的经验
患者安全是世界范围内的优先事项。当在提供患者护理方面出现问题时,所涉及的医疗保健专业人员可能会受到心理影响(第二个受害者,SVs)。最近,已经推出了不同的举措来解决这一现象。目的通过ERNST泛欧联盟确定欧洲目前关于SVs和其他与医疗保健专业人员缺乏福祉如何影响护理质量相关的主题的研究路线。方法采用横断面研究方法进行在线调查。所有82名学者和临床医生在2020年9月之前正式成为成本行动1913的成员,并代表27个欧洲国家和一个邻国被邀请参加。该调查由19个问题组成,探讨了参与者的科学概况、他们的兴趣、以前在SVs主题方面的经验以及在欧洲的相关工作领域。结果70名COST Action成员(85.4%)回应了调查。37名(37.1%)受访者过去曾进行或在进行调查时正在进行SV研究。17名参与者参与了支持svv的干预措施的实施。未来的研究方向包括法律问题、公开披露、培训项目和患者安全课程。结论:欧洲对性暴力现象的严重程度和一些促进医疗保健专业人员恢复能力的技术的有用性进行了研究。新的差距已经被发现。《成本行动1913》旨在促进欧洲合作,加强保健专业人员的福利,从而促进患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) and safety management systems: An integrated approach to managing safety in healthcare Challenges of integrating patient safety into nursing curricula: An integrative literature review Patient safety near misses – Still missing opportunities to learn A five-step approach to safer skin surgery Gaps in patient safety: Areas that need our attention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1