R. Vitorino, Luís Perpétuo, H. Rocha, R. Ferreira, B. Manadas, Francisco Amado, Sofia Guedes, Atef Mahmoud Mannaa, J. Vialaret, C. Hirtz
{"title":"Current understanding of dried spots platform for blood proteomics","authors":"R. Vitorino, Luís Perpétuo, H. Rocha, R. Ferreira, B. Manadas, Francisco Amado, Sofia Guedes, Atef Mahmoud Mannaa, J. Vialaret, C. Hirtz","doi":"10.2174/1570164620666230727104921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDry blood spots (DBS) have been used in combination with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for targeted proteomics to identify sensitive and specific novel biomarkers. DBS presents several advantages over other traditional blood sampling methods. This re-view discusses the past, present and future of the technology, focusing on studies with clin-ical and population relevance. Arguments for and against DBS are presented by discussing technological advances, particularly those related to mass spectrometry (MS) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), sample preparation issues, disease biomarkers, pharmacoki-netics, and pharmacodynamics. There will be a focus on proteomic studies that rely on DBS as a sampling method. In this context, numerous studies on the diagnosis and treatment of several diseases. To date, proteomic reports of studies using DBS have shown that DBS can facilitate diagnosis and prognosis. DBS offers several advantages that make it a viable op-tion for many fields. Moreover, some of its disadvantages can be easily overcome through automation to increase reproducibility and reduce protocol variability and standardization of parameters such as the volume of sample used. Within this context, here we propose to review the advantages and disadvantages of using DBS for blood proteomics and provide an understanding of how current DBS-based protocols are being conducted for future stand-ardization and protocol optimization.\n","PeriodicalId":50601,"journal":{"name":"Current Proteomics","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1570164620666230727104921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dry blood spots (DBS) have been used in combination with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for targeted proteomics to identify sensitive and specific novel biomarkers. DBS presents several advantages over other traditional blood sampling methods. This re-view discusses the past, present and future of the technology, focusing on studies with clin-ical and population relevance. Arguments for and against DBS are presented by discussing technological advances, particularly those related to mass spectrometry (MS) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), sample preparation issues, disease biomarkers, pharmacoki-netics, and pharmacodynamics. There will be a focus on proteomic studies that rely on DBS as a sampling method. In this context, numerous studies on the diagnosis and treatment of several diseases. To date, proteomic reports of studies using DBS have shown that DBS can facilitate diagnosis and prognosis. DBS offers several advantages that make it a viable op-tion for many fields. Moreover, some of its disadvantages can be easily overcome through automation to increase reproducibility and reduce protocol variability and standardization of parameters such as the volume of sample used. Within this context, here we propose to review the advantages and disadvantages of using DBS for blood proteomics and provide an understanding of how current DBS-based protocols are being conducted for future stand-ardization and protocol optimization.
Current ProteomicsBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>0 weeks
期刊介绍:
Research in the emerging field of proteomics is growing at an extremely rapid rate. The principal aim of Current Proteomics is to publish well-timed in-depth/mini review articles in this fast-expanding area on topics relevant and significant to the development of proteomics. Current Proteomics is an essential journal for everyone involved in proteomics and related fields in both academia and industry.
Current Proteomics publishes in-depth/mini review articles in all aspects of the fast-expanding field of proteomics. All areas of proteomics are covered together with the methodology, software, databases, technological advances and applications of proteomics, including functional proteomics. Diverse technologies covered include but are not limited to:
Protein separation and characterization techniques
2-D gel electrophoresis and image analysis
Techniques for protein expression profiling including mass spectrometry-based methods and algorithms for correlative database searching
Determination of co-translational and post- translational modification of proteins
Protein/peptide microarrays
Biomolecular interaction analysis
Analysis of protein complexes
Yeast two-hybrid projects
Protein-protein interaction (protein interactome) pathways and cell signaling networks
Systems biology
Proteome informatics (bioinformatics)
Knowledge integration and management tools
High-throughput protein structural studies (using mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray crystallography)
High-throughput computational methods for protein 3-D structure as well as function determination
Robotics, nanotechnology, and microfluidics.