Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Disorders and Quality of Life Measures in Postoperative Patients With Endometrial Cancer

Patrick A. Nosti , Colleen D. McDermott , Jeanne M. Schilder , Frederick B. Stehman , Patrick J. Woodman
{"title":"Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Disorders and Quality of Life Measures in Postoperative Patients With Endometrial Cancer","authors":"Patrick A. Nosti ,&nbsp;Colleen D. McDermott ,&nbsp;Jeanne M. Schilder ,&nbsp;Frederick B. Stehman ,&nbsp;Patrick J. Woodman","doi":"10.1016/j.cogc.2012.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The primary goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of pelvic floor symptoms in postoperative patients with endometrial cancer. The secondary goal was to assess the impact of these issues on patient quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study looked at women (N = 25) returning for postoperative care at least 6 months after total abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Severity of pelvic floor symptoms was assessed using the short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). The impact of these symptoms on quality of life was assessed using the short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Demographic data and PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores were summarized using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pelvic symptoms were reported at a much higher rate than seen in the general public. Symptom prevalence was reported by 21/25 (84%) patients on the PFDI-20 questionnaire, with a mean score of 52.5 ± 64.8. Patients reported prevalence of symptoms in the following order: urinary symptoms (19/25 [76%]) &gt; colorectal-anal symptoms (17/25 [68%]) &gt; pelvic organ prolapse symptoms (11/25 [44%]). Slightly fewer than half (11/24) of the study participants reported quality of life issues associated with their pelvic symptoms, with a mean score in the mild range: 26.4 ± 64.5. The reported prevalence of the effect of pelvic symptoms on quality of life was urinary (10/25 [40%]) &gt; colorectal-anal (8/24 [33%]) &gt; pelvic organ prolapse (4/24 [17%]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study has shown that there was a high prevalence of symptoms of PFDs in our population after abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 27-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogc.2012.04.002","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212955312000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background

The primary goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of pelvic floor symptoms in postoperative patients with endometrial cancer. The secondary goal was to assess the impact of these issues on patient quality of life.

Methods

This cross-sectional study looked at women (N = 25) returning for postoperative care at least 6 months after total abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Severity of pelvic floor symptoms was assessed using the short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). The impact of these symptoms on quality of life was assessed using the short-form version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7). Demographic data and PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results

Pelvic symptoms were reported at a much higher rate than seen in the general public. Symptom prevalence was reported by 21/25 (84%) patients on the PFDI-20 questionnaire, with a mean score of 52.5 ± 64.8. Patients reported prevalence of symptoms in the following order: urinary symptoms (19/25 [76%]) > colorectal-anal symptoms (17/25 [68%]) > pelvic organ prolapse symptoms (11/25 [44%]). Slightly fewer than half (11/24) of the study participants reported quality of life issues associated with their pelvic symptoms, with a mean score in the mild range: 26.4 ± 64.5. The reported prevalence of the effect of pelvic symptoms on quality of life was urinary (10/25 [40%]) > colorectal-anal (8/24 [33%]) > pelvic organ prolapse (4/24 [17%]).

Conclusion

This study has shown that there was a high prevalence of symptoms of PFDs in our population after abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜癌术后患者盆底障碍的症状和生活质量措施
本研究的主要目的是确定子宫内膜癌术后患者盆底症状的患病率。第二个目标是评估这些问题对患者生活质量的影响。方法:这项横断面研究观察了因子宫内膜癌而接受全腹子宫切除术后至少6个月的妇女(N = 25)。收集了人口统计学和临床数据。盆底症状的严重程度通过盆底窘迫量表(PFDI-20)进行评估。使用盆底影响问卷(PFIQ-7)评估这些症状对生活质量的影响。采用描述性统计对人口学资料和PFDI-20、PFIQ-7评分进行汇总。结果盆腔症状的发生率远高于普通人群。在PFDI-20问卷调查中,有21/25(84%)的患者报告了症状患病率,平均得分为52.5±64.8分。患者报告的症状发生率顺序如下:泌尿系统症状(19/25 [76%]);结直肠-肛门症状(17/25 [68%])>盆腔器官脱垂症状(11/25[44%])。略少于一半(11/24)的研究参与者报告了与盆腔症状相关的生活质量问题,平均评分在轻度范围:26.4±64.5。据报道,盆腔症状对生活质量影响的患病率为泌尿系(10/25 [40%]);结直肠-肛门(8/24 [33%])>盆腔器官脱垂(4/24[17%])。结论本研究表明,在我们的人群中,子宫内膜癌腹部子宫切除术后出现PFDs症状的发生率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Epigenetic Pathways Offer Targets for Ovarian Cancer Treatment Table of Contents Editorial Board A Simulation Study of the Factors Influencing the Risk of Intraoperative Slipping Genetic Cancer Ovary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1