PERFORMANCE OF AUS RICE IN DIFFERENT TILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROP ESTABLISHMENT METHOD IN SOUTHWEST BANGLADESH

L. Bari, Sharif Ahmed
{"title":"PERFORMANCE OF AUS RICE IN DIFFERENT TILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROP ESTABLISHMENT METHOD IN SOUTHWEST BANGLADESH","authors":"L. Bari, Sharif Ahmed","doi":"10.25081/JES.2018.V9.3577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High labor wage and irrigation water scarcity are the major constraints to becoming rice production less profitable and unsustainable in Bangladesh. To address these problems, rice production needed less water and less labor consuming production technologies. In traditional rice production systems which is puddled-transplanted rice (PTR), a significant amount of water and labor are used for tillage (wet) and transplanting operations.A farmers’ participatory on-farm trial was conducted to evaluate the performance of aus rice at different tillage systems and crop establishment methods in the southern part of Bangladesh. Wet tillage (puddled systems) to dry-tillage and transplanted rice to direct dry-seeded rice (DSR) may have the potential to reduce production cost by using less labor and water, resulting in higher profit. The trial examined tillage systems (strip tillage, reduced tillage and puddling) and crop establishment methods (direct dry-seeded and transplanted) in six farmers’ fields in aus 2015. Crop established by reducedand strip-tillage in DSR conditions reduced crop duration by 7 days compared to PTR. Grain yield (4.4-4.6 t ha-1) was similar in DSR which is established by reducedand strip-tillage conditions and PTR; however, total production cost in DSR was 15-18% lower than the PTR. Slightly higher but significantly similar gross income was recorded in PTR than DSR, however, net profit was significantly lower in PTR and it was due to higher production cost involvement. DSR has the potentiality of similar yield to PTR and reduces production cost which increases the net profit of rice production. KEYWORDs: Agricultural mechanization, dry-seeded rice, strip-tillage, reduced-tillage, aus rice. Copyright: © 2018 The authors. This article is open access and licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, or format for any purpose, even commercially provided the work is properly cited. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Regular Article Received: February 22, 2018 Accepted: May 01, 2018 Published: May 11, 2018 *Corresponding Author: Sharif Ahmed Email: s.ahmed@irri.org ISSN: 2218-1768","PeriodicalId":78355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental medical sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"05-08"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25081/JES.2018.V9.3577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

High labor wage and irrigation water scarcity are the major constraints to becoming rice production less profitable and unsustainable in Bangladesh. To address these problems, rice production needed less water and less labor consuming production technologies. In traditional rice production systems which is puddled-transplanted rice (PTR), a significant amount of water and labor are used for tillage (wet) and transplanting operations.A farmers’ participatory on-farm trial was conducted to evaluate the performance of aus rice at different tillage systems and crop establishment methods in the southern part of Bangladesh. Wet tillage (puddled systems) to dry-tillage and transplanted rice to direct dry-seeded rice (DSR) may have the potential to reduce production cost by using less labor and water, resulting in higher profit. The trial examined tillage systems (strip tillage, reduced tillage and puddling) and crop establishment methods (direct dry-seeded and transplanted) in six farmers’ fields in aus 2015. Crop established by reducedand strip-tillage in DSR conditions reduced crop duration by 7 days compared to PTR. Grain yield (4.4-4.6 t ha-1) was similar in DSR which is established by reducedand strip-tillage conditions and PTR; however, total production cost in DSR was 15-18% lower than the PTR. Slightly higher but significantly similar gross income was recorded in PTR than DSR, however, net profit was significantly lower in PTR and it was due to higher production cost involvement. DSR has the potentiality of similar yield to PTR and reduces production cost which increases the net profit of rice production. KEYWORDs: Agricultural mechanization, dry-seeded rice, strip-tillage, reduced-tillage, aus rice. Copyright: © 2018 The authors. This article is open access and licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, or format for any purpose, even commercially provided the work is properly cited. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Regular Article Received: February 22, 2018 Accepted: May 01, 2018 Published: May 11, 2018 *Corresponding Author: Sharif Ahmed Email: s.ahmed@irri.org ISSN: 2218-1768
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国西南部不同耕作制度和种植方法下的水稻生产性能
劳动力工资高和灌溉用水短缺是孟加拉国水稻生产利润下降和不可持续的主要制约因素。为了解决这些问题,水稻生产需要更少的水和更少的劳动消耗生产技术。在传统的水稻生产系统中,即水坑插秧水稻(PTR),大量的水和劳动力用于耕作(湿)和插秧操作。在孟加拉国南部进行了一项农民参与式农场试验,以评估不同耕作制度和作物种植方法下水稻的表现。湿耕(水坑制)改干耕,移栽水稻改直接干播水稻(DSR),可以减少劳动力和用水,降低生产成本,从而获得更高的利润。该试验于2015年7月在6个农户的农田中考察了耕作制度(条播、少耕和水坑耕作)和作物种植方法(直接干播和移植)。在DSR条件下,与PTR条件相比,减少和带状耕作的作物持续时间减少了7天。减量和条带耕作条件下的DSR与PTR建立的产量(4.4 ~ 4.6 t hm -1)相似;然而,DSR的总生产成本比PTR低15-18%。PTR记录的毛收入略高于DSR,但与DSR记录的毛收入相似。然而,PTR记录的净利润明显低于DSR,这是由于更高的生产成本。DSR具有与PTR相似的产量潜力,降低了生产成本,增加了水稻生产的净利润。关键词:农业机械化,旱种水稻,带状耕作,少耕,水稻版权所有:©2018作者。这篇文章是开放获取的,并根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)的条款获得许可,该条款允许不受限制地以任何媒介或格式为任何目的使用、分发和复制,甚至在商业上提供适当的引用。署名——您必须给出适当的署名,提供许可证的链接,并指出是否进行了更改。收稿日期:2018年2月22日收稿日期:2018年5月1日发布日期:2018年5月11日*通讯作者:Sharif Ahmed Email: s.ahmed@irri.org ISSN: 2218-1768
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fungal spore distribution in two hospitals in Kabale district, Uganda Swim test for joint angles dispersion analysis during hind limb motor function assessment in SCI models Blood glucose regulating hormones and their physiological and biochemical roles Larvicidal activity of some selected medicinal plant extracts against the vector of filariasis Comparing the efficiency of base and multiplicative selection indices for yield and quality traits in Cassava
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1