S. K. Hosseini, B. Naghshtabrizi, F. Emami, A. Yazdi, Nima Naghshtabrizi, S. Zebarjadi
{"title":"Very Early Discharge of Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"S. K. Hosseini, B. Naghshtabrizi, F. Emami, A. Yazdi, Nima Naghshtabrizi, S. Zebarjadi","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v16i3.8188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The discharge of uncomplicated patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 48 to 72 hours has been proven safe and feasible. The safety and feasibility of the very early discharge (≤48 h) of such patients, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited bed availability and infection risk, have yet to be evaluated. Methods: In this cohort study on 108 patients with STEMI who presented to Farshchian Heart Center between February and May 2020, 30 patients received fibrinolysis and 78 were scheduled for emergent coronary angiography. One patient had no coronary obstruction, 3 underwent emergent surgery, and 3 had high-risk features mandating a prolonged stay. The remaining patients were assigned to either Group A (≤48 h) or Group B (>48 h) regarding hospital discharge. Demographic, angiographic, procedural, and outcome data were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Group A consisted of 51 patients, including 7 women (13.7%), at a mean age of 62.74±12.35 years, and Group B comprised 20 patients, including 4 women (20.0%), at a mean age of 65.20±12.82 years. The mean hospital length of stay was 38.02±9.15 hours in Group A and 88.20±23.31 hours in Group B (P<0.001). The mean stent diameter was smaller in Group B (3.19±0.34 mm vs 2.96±0.29 mm; P=0.008). Demographic, angiographic, procedural, and outcome data, including the rates of in-hospital, 1-week, and 1-month mortality, were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study shows that a hospital discharge in less than 48 hours in low-risk patients with STEMI is safe and feasible. The potential advantages of this approach in the COVID-19 pandemic should be balanced against its risks.","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"12 1","pages":"113 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v16i3.8188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: The discharge of uncomplicated patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 48 to 72 hours has been proven safe and feasible. The safety and feasibility of the very early discharge (≤48 h) of such patients, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited bed availability and infection risk, have yet to be evaluated. Methods: In this cohort study on 108 patients with STEMI who presented to Farshchian Heart Center between February and May 2020, 30 patients received fibrinolysis and 78 were scheduled for emergent coronary angiography. One patient had no coronary obstruction, 3 underwent emergent surgery, and 3 had high-risk features mandating a prolonged stay. The remaining patients were assigned to either Group A (≤48 h) or Group B (>48 h) regarding hospital discharge. Demographic, angiographic, procedural, and outcome data were compared between the 2 groups. Results: Group A consisted of 51 patients, including 7 women (13.7%), at a mean age of 62.74±12.35 years, and Group B comprised 20 patients, including 4 women (20.0%), at a mean age of 65.20±12.82 years. The mean hospital length of stay was 38.02±9.15 hours in Group A and 88.20±23.31 hours in Group B (P<0.001). The mean stent diameter was smaller in Group B (3.19±0.34 mm vs 2.96±0.29 mm; P=0.008). Demographic, angiographic, procedural, and outcome data, including the rates of in-hospital, 1-week, and 1-month mortality, were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study shows that a hospital discharge in less than 48 hours in low-risk patients with STEMI is safe and feasible. The potential advantages of this approach in the COVID-19 pandemic should be balanced against its risks.
背景:无并发症st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在48 ~ 72小时内出院已被证明是安全可行的。这些患者早期出院(≤48小时)的安全性和可行性,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间,床位有限,感染风险大,尚待评估。方法:对2020年2月至5月在Farshchian心脏中心就诊的108例STEMI患者进行队列研究,其中30例患者接受了纤维蛋白溶解治疗,78例患者计划进行急诊冠状动脉造影。1名患者没有冠状动脉阻塞,3名患者接受了紧急手术,3名患者有高风险特征,需要延长住院时间。其余患者按出院时间分为A组(≤48 h)和B组(>48 h)。比较两组患者的人口学、血管造影、手术和结局数据。结果:A组51例,女性7例(13.7%),平均年龄62.74±12.35岁;B组20例,女性4例(20.0%),平均年龄65.20±12.82岁。A组平均住院时间为38.02±9.15 h, B组平均住院时间为88.20±23.31 h (P<0.001)。B组平均支架直径较小(3.19±0.34 mm vs 2.96±0.29 mm);P = 0.008)。人口学、血管造影、手术和结局数据,包括住院率、1周死亡率和1个月死亡率,在两组之间相似。结论:本研究表明低危STEMI患者在48小时内出院是安全可行的。在COVID-19大流行中,这种方法的潜在优势应与其风险相平衡。