Microhabitat use and separation between giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), takin (Budorcas taxicolor), and goral (Naemorhedus griseus) in Tangjiahe Nature Reserve, China

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Folia Zoologica Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.25225/fozo.v67.i3-4.a10.2018
Wei Wei, H. Han, Hong Zhou, Mingsheng Hong, Shanshan Cao, Zejun Zhang
{"title":"Microhabitat use and separation between giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), takin (Budorcas taxicolor), and goral (Naemorhedus griseus) in Tangjiahe Nature Reserve, China","authors":"Wei Wei, H. Han, Hong Zhou, Mingsheng Hong, Shanshan Cao, Zejun Zhang","doi":"10.25225/fozo.v67.i3-4.a10.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. \n The coexistence mechanisms of sympatric species have attracted wide attention from ecologists. The giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), takin (Budorcas taxicolor) and goral (Naemorhedus griseus) are species which are being seriously endangered along to the Himalayan-Hengduan Mountains. To improve the understanding of mechanism of microhabitat separation and coexistence between the giant panda and the other two sympatric species, we investigated microhabitat characteristics at Tangjiahe Nature Reserve, Qingchuan County of Sichuan Province, China during 2013 by sampling 86 fecal-site plots for giant pandas, takins and gorals as well as 80 control plots. Our results suggested that each species has their own specific microhabitat selection pattern. Furthermore, the giant pandas more often selected microhabitats with gentler slope, more bamboo, lower tree canopy and a small herb shrub while the takins and gorals preferred the microhabitats with less bamboo, but more trees and shrubs. Thus, based on our findings, food resources, dietary requirements and energy expenditure are considered as the main ecological factors which caused the microhabitat separation among these three species. Because of the narrow dietary, the giant panda's specificity to its microhabitat is higher than that of the other two animals, which results in their segmentation. This study provides a scientific evidence that conservation efforts should be under way to protect the sympatric habitat, not only the suitable habitat for giant pandas but also that of takins and gorals, which can make a great improvement to the local biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":50436,"journal":{"name":"Folia Zoologica","volume":"33 1","pages":"198 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Zoologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v67.i3-4.a10.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. The coexistence mechanisms of sympatric species have attracted wide attention from ecologists. The giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), takin (Budorcas taxicolor) and goral (Naemorhedus griseus) are species which are being seriously endangered along to the Himalayan-Hengduan Mountains. To improve the understanding of mechanism of microhabitat separation and coexistence between the giant panda and the other two sympatric species, we investigated microhabitat characteristics at Tangjiahe Nature Reserve, Qingchuan County of Sichuan Province, China during 2013 by sampling 86 fecal-site plots for giant pandas, takins and gorals as well as 80 control plots. Our results suggested that each species has their own specific microhabitat selection pattern. Furthermore, the giant pandas more often selected microhabitats with gentler slope, more bamboo, lower tree canopy and a small herb shrub while the takins and gorals preferred the microhabitats with less bamboo, but more trees and shrubs. Thus, based on our findings, food resources, dietary requirements and energy expenditure are considered as the main ecological factors which caused the microhabitat separation among these three species. Because of the narrow dietary, the giant panda's specificity to its microhabitat is higher than that of the other two animals, which results in their segmentation. This study provides a scientific evidence that conservation efforts should be under way to protect the sympatric habitat, not only the suitable habitat for giant pandas but also that of takins and gorals, which can make a great improvement to the local biodiversity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唐家河自然保护区大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)、羚牛(Budorcas taxicolor)和山羊(Naemorhedus griseus)的微生境利用与分离
摘要同域物种的共存机制引起了生态学家的广泛关注。大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)、羚牛(Budorcas taxicolor)和山羊(Naemorhedus griseus)是沿喜马拉雅-横断山脉分布的严重濒危物种。为了更好地了解大熊猫与其他两种同域物种的微生境分离与共存机制,2013年在四川省青川县唐家河自然保护区,通过对86个大熊猫、羚牛和野狗粪便样地以及80个对照样地的取样,研究了大熊猫与其他两种同域物种的微生境特征。结果表明,每个物种都有自己特定的微生境选择模式。此外,大熊猫更倾向于选择坡度较缓、竹材较多、树冠较低、草本灌木较少的微生境,而鹦鹉和野猫则更倾向于选择竹材较少、乔木和灌木较多的微生境。因此,根据我们的研究结果,食物资源、饮食需求和能量消耗是导致三种物种微生境分离的主要生态因素。由于饮食狭窄,大熊猫对其微生境的特异性高于其他两种动物,这导致了它们的分割。本研究提供了科学依据,表明应加强对同域栖息地的保护,不仅要保护大熊猫的栖息地,而且要保护野生动物和野生动物的栖息地,这将大大改善当地的生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Zoologica
Folia Zoologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Browning plasticity of white adipose tissue in tree shrew during cold acclimation and rewarming How strong are eggs of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus? The blunt pole is not a source of more salient recognition cues than the sharp pole for the rejection of model eggs by American robins (Turdus migratorius) Survival of water rail Rallus aquaticus (Aves, Rallidae) embryos exposed to experimental flooding Nest-site selection of an avian urban exploiter, the Eurasian magpie Pica pica, across the urban-rural gradient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1