School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2015-04-01 DOI:10.4073/CSR.2015.10
K. Zwi, S. Woolfenden, D. Wheeler, T. O'Brien, P. Tait, K. Williams
{"title":"School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse.","authors":"K. Zwi, S. Woolfenden, D. Wheeler, T. O'Brien, P. Tait, K. Williams","doi":"10.4073/CSR.2015.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nChild sexual abuse is a significant problem that requires an effective means of prevention.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nTo assess: if school-based programmes are effective in improving knowledge about sexual abuse and self-protective behaviours; whether participation results in an increase in disclosure of sexual abuse and/or produces any harm; knowledge retention and the effect of programme type or setting.\n\n\nSEARCH STRATEGY\nElectronic searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Dissertation Abstracts and other databases using MESH headings and text words specific for child sexual assault and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted in August 2006.\n\n\nSELECTION CRITERIA\nRCTs or quasi-RCTs of school-based interventions to prevent child sexual abuse compared with another intervention or no intervention.\n\n\nDATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS\nMeta-analyses and sensitivity analysis, using two imputed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (0.1, 0.2), were used for four outcomes: protective behaviours, questionnaire-based knowledge, vignette-based knowledge and disclosure of abuse. Meta-analysis was not possible for retention of knowledge, likelihood of harm, or effect of programme type and setting.\n\n\nMAIN RESULTS\nFifteen trials measuring knowledge and behaviour change as a result of school-based child sexual abuse intervention programmes were included. Over half the studies in each initial meta-analysis contained unit of analysis errors. For behaviour change, two studies had data suitable for meta-analysis; results favoured intervention (OR 6.76, 95% CI 1.44, 31.84) with moderate heterogeneity (I(2)=56.0%) and did not change significantly when adjustments using intraclass coefficients were made. Nine studies were included in a meta-analysis evaluating questionnaire-based knowledge. An increase in knowledge was found (SMD 0.59; 0.44, 0.74, heterogeneity (I2=66.4%). When adjusted for an ICC of 0.1 and 0.2 the results were SMD 0.6 (0.45, 0.75) and 0.57 (0.44, 0.71) respectively. Heterogeneity decreased with increasing ICC. A meta-analysis of four studies evaluating vignette-based knowledge favoured intervention (SMD 0.37 (0.18, 0.55)) with low heterogeneity (I(2)=0.0%) and no significant change when ICC adjustments were made. Meta-analysis of between-group differences of reported disclosures did not show a statistically significant difference.\n\n\nAUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS\nStudies evaluated in this review report significant improvements in knowledge measures and protective behaviours. Results might have differed had the true ICCs from studies been available or cluster-adjusted results been available. Several studies reported harms, suggesting a need to monitor the impact of similar interventions. Retention of knowledge should be measured beyond 3-12 months. Further investigation of the best forms of presentation and optimal age of programme delivery is required.","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"33 1","pages":"CD004380"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"229","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4073/CSR.2015.10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 229

Abstract

BACKGROUND Child sexual abuse is a significant problem that requires an effective means of prevention. OBJECTIVES To assess: if school-based programmes are effective in improving knowledge about sexual abuse and self-protective behaviours; whether participation results in an increase in disclosure of sexual abuse and/or produces any harm; knowledge retention and the effect of programme type or setting. SEARCH STRATEGY Electronic searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Dissertation Abstracts and other databases using MESH headings and text words specific for child sexual assault and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted in August 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs or quasi-RCTs of school-based interventions to prevent child sexual abuse compared with another intervention or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Meta-analyses and sensitivity analysis, using two imputed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (0.1, 0.2), were used for four outcomes: protective behaviours, questionnaire-based knowledge, vignette-based knowledge and disclosure of abuse. Meta-analysis was not possible for retention of knowledge, likelihood of harm, or effect of programme type and setting. MAIN RESULTS Fifteen trials measuring knowledge and behaviour change as a result of school-based child sexual abuse intervention programmes were included. Over half the studies in each initial meta-analysis contained unit of analysis errors. For behaviour change, two studies had data suitable for meta-analysis; results favoured intervention (OR 6.76, 95% CI 1.44, 31.84) with moderate heterogeneity (I(2)=56.0%) and did not change significantly when adjustments using intraclass coefficients were made. Nine studies were included in a meta-analysis evaluating questionnaire-based knowledge. An increase in knowledge was found (SMD 0.59; 0.44, 0.74, heterogeneity (I2=66.4%). When adjusted for an ICC of 0.1 and 0.2 the results were SMD 0.6 (0.45, 0.75) and 0.57 (0.44, 0.71) respectively. Heterogeneity decreased with increasing ICC. A meta-analysis of four studies evaluating vignette-based knowledge favoured intervention (SMD 0.37 (0.18, 0.55)) with low heterogeneity (I(2)=0.0%) and no significant change when ICC adjustments were made. Meta-analysis of between-group differences of reported disclosures did not show a statistically significant difference. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Studies evaluated in this review report significant improvements in knowledge measures and protective behaviours. Results might have differed had the true ICCs from studies been available or cluster-adjusted results been available. Several studies reported harms, suggesting a need to monitor the impact of similar interventions. Retention of knowledge should be measured beyond 3-12 months. Further investigation of the best forms of presentation and optimal age of programme delivery is required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以学校为本的防止儿童受到性侵犯的教育方案。
儿童性虐待是一个严重的问题,需要有效的预防手段。目的评估:以学校为基础的课程在提高对性虐待和自我保护行为的认识方面是否有效;参与是否导致性虐待的披露增加和/或造成任何伤害;知识保留与课程类型或设置的影响。检索策略:2006年8月,使用MESH标题和儿童性侵犯相关文本词,对Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Sociological Abstracts、Dissertation Abstracts等数据库和随机对照试验(RCTs)进行电子检索。选择标准:以学校为基础的预防儿童性虐待干预与其他干预或无干预的对照试验或准对照试验。数据收集和分析使用两个输入的类内相关系数(ICC)(0.1, 0.2)进行meta分析和敏感性分析,对四个结果进行分析:保护行为、基于问卷的知识、基于小插曲的知识和虐待的披露。对知识的保留、危害的可能性或项目类型和环境的影响进行meta分析是不可能的。主要结果包括15项试验,测量基于学校的儿童性虐待干预计划的知识和行为变化。在每个初始荟萃分析中,超过一半的研究包含分析单位错误。对于行为改变,两项研究的数据适合荟萃分析;结果支持干预(OR 6.76, 95% CI 1.44, 31.84),具有中等异质性(I(2)=56.0%),并且在使用类内系数进行调整时无显著变化。九项研究被纳入评估以问卷为基础的知识的元分析。发现知识增加(SMD 0.59;0.44, 0.74,异质性(I2=66.4%)。当调整ICC为0.1和0.2时,结果分别为SMD 0.6(0.45, 0.75)和0.57(0.44,0.71)。异质性随ICC的增加而降低。四项研究的荟萃分析评估了基于小插曲的知识支持干预(SMD 0.37(0.18, 0.55)),异质性低(I(2)=0.0%),并且在进行ICC调整后没有显着变化。报告披露的组间差异荟萃分析没有显示统计学上的显著差异。作者结论:本综述中评估的研究在知识措施和保护行为方面有显著改善。如果可获得研究的真实icc或可获得聚类调整的结果,结果可能会有所不同。几项研究报告了危害,表明有必要监测类似干预措施的影响。知识的保留应超过3-12个月。需要进一步调查最佳呈现形式和方案执行的最佳年龄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a network meta-analysis. Acupuncture for neonatal abstinence syndrome in newborn infants. Cardiovascular training for fatigue in people with cancer. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1