Summary of the History of Improvement and Optimization of Fuel Management Strategies for Two 1000 MWe PWR Units

IF 0.4 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1115/icone29-92954
Zhou Xiaoling, Xu Zhixian, Zhao Bingquan, Li Wen, Zhong Shengdong, Gao Jinghui
{"title":"Summary of the History of Improvement and Optimization of Fuel Management Strategies for Two 1000 MWe PWR Units","authors":"Zhou Xiaoling, Xu Zhixian, Zhao Bingquan, Li Wen, Zhong Shengdong, Gao Jinghui","doi":"10.1115/icone29-92954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper takes a certain nuclear power plant (NPP) which consists of two 1000 MWe PWR units as the research object, and summarizes various fuel management strategies experienced since it started commercial operation in 2002 and 2003. These fuel management strategies include:\n 1) high-leakage annual refueling, refueling fuel enrichment is 3.2% and cycle length reaches about 270 EFPD;\n 2) fuel type mixed refueling (AFA2G and AFA3G mixed), refueling fuel enrichment increases from 3.2% to 3.7% and cycle length reaches about 320 EFPD;\n 3) low-leakage 1/4 refueling, refueling fuel enrichment increases from 3.7% to 4.2% and cycle length reaches about 316 EFPD that fuel economy has been greatly improved;\n 4) low-leakage 18-months refueling, refueling fuel enrichment increases from 4.2% to 4.45% and the refueling cycle has been extended from annual refueling to an average of 16 months;\n 5) two-enrichment refueling, refueling fuel enrichment is extended from single 4.45% to two enrichment 4.45% and 4.00%, which improves the flexibility of fuel management to well meet the load shedding needs.\n This paper reviews each fuel management strategy’s general refueling pattern, main design parameters and actual operating parameters of the core, fuel economy and the feedback of related problems, finally further suggests a few optimizations of future fuel management strategies.","PeriodicalId":36762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/icone29-92954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper takes a certain nuclear power plant (NPP) which consists of two 1000 MWe PWR units as the research object, and summarizes various fuel management strategies experienced since it started commercial operation in 2002 and 2003. These fuel management strategies include: 1) high-leakage annual refueling, refueling fuel enrichment is 3.2% and cycle length reaches about 270 EFPD; 2) fuel type mixed refueling (AFA2G and AFA3G mixed), refueling fuel enrichment increases from 3.2% to 3.7% and cycle length reaches about 320 EFPD; 3) low-leakage 1/4 refueling, refueling fuel enrichment increases from 3.7% to 4.2% and cycle length reaches about 316 EFPD that fuel economy has been greatly improved; 4) low-leakage 18-months refueling, refueling fuel enrichment increases from 4.2% to 4.45% and the refueling cycle has been extended from annual refueling to an average of 16 months; 5) two-enrichment refueling, refueling fuel enrichment is extended from single 4.45% to two enrichment 4.45% and 4.00%, which improves the flexibility of fuel management to well meet the load shedding needs. This paper reviews each fuel management strategy’s general refueling pattern, main design parameters and actual operating parameters of the core, fuel economy and the feedback of related problems, finally further suggests a few optimizations of future fuel management strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两台1000mwe压水堆机组燃料管理策略改进与优化历史总结
本文以某核电站2台1000mwe压水堆机组为研究对象,总结了该核电站自2002年和2003年开始商业运行以来的各种燃料管理策略。这些燃料管理策略包括:1)高泄漏年度加油,加油燃料富集度为3.2%,循环长度达到270 EFPD左右;2)燃料型混合加油(AFA2G和AFA3G混合加油),加油燃料富集度从3.2%提高到3.7%,循环长度达到320 EFPD左右;3)低泄漏1/4加油,加油燃料富集度由3.7%提高到4.2%,循环长度达到316 EFPD左右,燃油经济性大大提高;4)低泄漏18个月换料,换料燃料浓缩度由4.2%提高至4.45%,换料周期由每年换料延长至平均16个月;5)双浓缩加注,加注燃料浓缩度由单次4.45%扩展为两次浓缩4.45%和4.00%,提高了燃料管理的灵活性,很好地满足减载需求。本文综述了各种燃料管理策略的一般加油方式、堆芯的主要设计参数和实际运行参数、燃油经济性以及相关问题的反馈,最后进一步提出了未来燃料管理策略的几点优化建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Transport Risk Assessment for On-Road/Sea Transport of Decommissioning Waste of Kori Unit 1 Physicochemical Property of Borosilicate Glass for Rare Earth Waste From the PyroGreen Process Occupational Dose Analysis of Spent Resin Handling Accident During NPP Decommissioning Fissile Measurement in Various Types Using Nuclear Resonances Prediction Model for Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Bentonite Buffer Materials for an Engineered-Barrier System in a High-Level Radioactive Waste Repository
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1