Cross-cultural Research of the Perceived Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic

K. Krumov, J. Schneider, Jin Liu, A. Krumova, Eko Widodo Widodo, A. Gungov, Márta Juhász, Magdalena Garvanova, S. Kumar, Rita Répáczki
{"title":"Cross-cultural Research of the Perceived Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"K. Krumov, J. Schneider, Jin Liu, A. Krumova, Eko Widodo Widodo, A. Gungov, Márta Juhász, Magdalena Garvanova, S. Kumar, Rita Répáczki","doi":"10.54560/jracr.v13i1.352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the essential aspects in analyzing the topic of managing people's risk behavior in extreme situations is related to the issue of risk perception. The subject of this study was to reveal whether certain factors, such as cultural context, gender, age, education, religious beliefs, etc., mediate the perceived risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted online from April to June 2020. The two samples included a total of 2617 participants aged between 18 and 70 years, where 1412 of which were drawn from Asia and 1205 were representatives of Europe. Participants were asked to complete an internet-based version of a short questionnaire that described the COVID-19 pandemic situation, as one of the questions referred to the hazard perception of the infection. Results obtained showed that there was a higher level of perceived risk among members of the Asian culture group in comparison with the European study participants. Furthermore, it was revealed that gender is not a significant factor in the perception of risk in either the European or the Asian cultural group (p> 0.05). The results showed that levels of the perceived risk increased with age and that there were significant differences between young and old in threat perception for the European sample (p<0.001). Regarding the Asian sample, it turned out that all age groups perceive the risk of infection almost equally. Several demographic characteristics also emerged as important mediators of risk perception. For example, people with the lowest education, married, religious, and families with children fear the hazard of COVID-19 infection to the greatest extent, compared to people with the highest education, singles, atheists, and families without children, who do not perceive the virus as a high-risk factor.","PeriodicalId":31887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response JRACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v13i1.352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the essential aspects in analyzing the topic of managing people's risk behavior in extreme situations is related to the issue of risk perception. The subject of this study was to reveal whether certain factors, such as cultural context, gender, age, education, religious beliefs, etc., mediate the perceived risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted online from April to June 2020. The two samples included a total of 2617 participants aged between 18 and 70 years, where 1412 of which were drawn from Asia and 1205 were representatives of Europe. Participants were asked to complete an internet-based version of a short questionnaire that described the COVID-19 pandemic situation, as one of the questions referred to the hazard perception of the infection. Results obtained showed that there was a higher level of perceived risk among members of the Asian culture group in comparison with the European study participants. Furthermore, it was revealed that gender is not a significant factor in the perception of risk in either the European or the Asian cultural group (p> 0.05). The results showed that levels of the perceived risk increased with age and that there were significant differences between young and old in threat perception for the European sample (p<0.001). Regarding the Asian sample, it turned out that all age groups perceive the risk of infection almost equally. Several demographic characteristics also emerged as important mediators of risk perception. For example, people with the lowest education, married, religious, and families with children fear the hazard of COVID-19 infection to the greatest extent, compared to people with the highest education, singles, atheists, and families without children, who do not perceive the virus as a high-risk factor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间感知风险的跨文化研究
在分析极端情况下管理人们风险行为的主题时,一个重要的方面与风险感知问题有关。本研究的主题是揭示某些因素,如文化背景、性别、年龄、教育程度、宗教信仰等,是否介导了COVID-19大流行期间的感知风险。该研究于2020年4月至6月在网上进行。这两个样本共包括2617名年龄在18至70岁之间的参与者,其中1412名来自亚洲,1205名来自欧洲。参与者被要求完成一份基于互联网的简短问卷,该问卷描述了COVID-19大流行的情况,其中一个问题涉及对感染的危害认知。结果显示,与欧洲研究参与者相比,亚洲文化组成员的感知风险水平更高。此外,在欧洲和亚洲文化群体中,性别对风险感知的影响均不显著(p> 0.05)。结果显示,感知风险的水平随着年龄的增长而增加,欧洲样本中年轻人和老年人在威胁感知方面存在显著差异(p<0.001)。关于亚洲样本,结果表明,所有年龄组对感染风险的感知几乎相同。一些人口特征也成为风险感知的重要中介。例如,与教育程度最高的人、单身人士、无神论者和没有孩子的家庭相比,受教育程度最低的人、已婚人士、宗教人士和有孩子的家庭对COVID-19感染危险的恐惧程度最高,后者不认为病毒是高风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The 10th International Conference on Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2023), August 12-14, Oxford, UK: Global Collaboration to Enhance Information Technology & Quantitative Management Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stations Disaster Risk Preparedness Assessment of Port Harcourt City, Nigeria The Impact of COVID-19 Prevention Policy on Stock Market Return of China The 7th Symposium on Disaster Risk Analysis and Management in Western China Was Successfully Held in Urumqi Research on the Impact of Green Bonds on Credit Risk of Manufacturing Enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1