Response to the Special Issue: The Utility of the Pattern of the Strengths and Weaknesses Approach

Catherine A. Fiorello, D. Flanagan, J. B. Hale
{"title":"Response to the Special Issue: The Utility of the Pattern of the Strengths and Weaknesses Approach","authors":"Catherine A. Fiorello, D. Flanagan, J. B. Hale","doi":"10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I1-5154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike abilityachievement discrepancy and response-to-intervention approaches, the processing strengths and weaknesses (PSW) approach is the only empirically based approach that attempts to identify the pattern of deficit in the basic psychological processes that interferes with academic achievement for children with specific learning disabilities (SLD). If used in combination with RTI, any child who meets PSW criteria would be more likely to be correctly identified as having SLD because both IDEA (2004) statutory (i.e., SLD definition) and regulatory (i.e., SLD method) requirements would be met. In addition, understanding a childs PSW could lead directly to differentiated instruction and targeted interventions for affected children. Although PSW research has been emerging in recent years, this is the first special issue devoted to empirical examination of the PSW method. The articles presented here attest to the value and potential of a PSW approach to identifying SLD, but the critique presented here suggests a rigid psychometric PSW approach is insufficient for identifying SLD and other disorders. Implications for clinical practice and future research will be elucidated.","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I1-5154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Unlike abilityachievement discrepancy and response-to-intervention approaches, the processing strengths and weaknesses (PSW) approach is the only empirically based approach that attempts to identify the pattern of deficit in the basic psychological processes that interferes with academic achievement for children with specific learning disabilities (SLD). If used in combination with RTI, any child who meets PSW criteria would be more likely to be correctly identified as having SLD because both IDEA (2004) statutory (i.e., SLD definition) and regulatory (i.e., SLD method) requirements would be met. In addition, understanding a childs PSW could lead directly to differentiated instruction and targeted interventions for affected children. Although PSW research has been emerging in recent years, this is the first special issue devoted to empirical examination of the PSW method. The articles presented here attest to the value and potential of a PSW approach to identifying SLD, but the critique presented here suggests a rigid psychometric PSW approach is insufficient for identifying SLD and other disorders. Implications for clinical practice and future research will be elucidated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对特刊的回应:优势和劣势方法模式的效用
与能力成就差异和反应干预方法不同,处理优势和弱点(PSW)方法是唯一一种基于经验的方法,它试图识别干扰特殊学习障碍(SLD)儿童学业成就的基本心理过程缺陷模式。如果与RTI结合使用,任何符合PSW标准的儿童都更有可能被正确识别为患有SLD,因为IDEA(2004)的法定(即SLD定义)和监管(即SLD方法)要求都将得到满足。此外,了解儿童的PSW可以直接导致对受影响儿童的差异化教学和有针对性的干预。虽然PSW研究近年来不断出现,但这是第一个专门研究PSW方法的实证研究的特刊。这里提出的文章证明了PSW方法识别SLD的价值和潜力,但这里提出的批评表明,严格的心理测量PSW方法不足以识别SLD和其他疾病。对临床实践和未来研究的启示将被阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Response to Intervention as a Structuring Benchmark for Organizing Services for Students at Risk and With Learning Difficulties in Reading: A Multiple Case Study in Three Elementary Schools Supportive Environments Providing Social and Emotional Learning Explain Success in People with Learning Disabilities An Evidence Review of Key Transition Components for Students with Learning Disabilities Modified Student Success Skills for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Pilot Study Culturally Sustaining Mathematics for Dual Language Learners in a Multitiered System of Supports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1