AhpC, AhpD, and a Secreted 14-Kilodalton Antigen fromMycobacterium avium subsp.paratuberculosis Distinguish between Paratuberculosis and Bovine Tuberculosis in an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

I. Olsen, M. Tryland, H. Wiker, L. Reitan
{"title":"AhpC, AhpD, and a Secreted 14-Kilodalton Antigen fromMycobacterium avium subsp.paratuberculosis Distinguish between Paratuberculosis and Bovine Tuberculosis in an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay","authors":"I. Olsen, M. Tryland, H. Wiker, L. Reitan","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.08.4.797-801.2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sera from cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis(n = 56) and naturally (n = 4) and experimentally (n = 8) infected withMycobacterium bovis were tested for the presence of antibodies against paratuberculosis antigens. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established based on absorption ofM. avium subsp. paratuberculosis antigens on a hyperimmune antiserum against M. avium subsp.avium proteins in order to remove cross-reacting antigens. This absorbed-antigen ELISA recognized 66% of animals with paratuberculosis (37 of 56), while none of the animals with naturally occurring bovine tuberculosis (TB) had detectable antibodies. However, the animals with experimental bovine TB also responded in this ELISA. Similar results were found in a commercial ELISA, showing that neither of these tests was able to distinguish between paratuberculosis and bovine TB. The sera were further tested for antibody activities against purified AhpC and AhpD, which are proteins constitutively expressed byM. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, and against a secreted 14-kDa protein present in culture filtrates from theM. avium complex. Elevated antibody levels to AhpC, AhpD, and the 14-kDa antigen were found in 27% (13 of 48), 15% (7 of 48), and 27% (13 of 48), respectively, of the cattle with paratuberculosis. Together these ELISAs were positive with 35% (17 of 48) of the animals. None of the animals with bovine TB had detectable antibodies against any of the purified proteins despite their high levels of cross-reacting antibodies. These results show that purified specific antigens are needed to differentiate between paratuberculosis and bovine TB in ELISA.","PeriodicalId":10395,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology","volume":"44 1","pages":"797 - 801"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.08.4.797-801.2001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sera from cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis(n = 56) and naturally (n = 4) and experimentally (n = 8) infected withMycobacterium bovis were tested for the presence of antibodies against paratuberculosis antigens. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established based on absorption ofM. avium subsp. paratuberculosis antigens on a hyperimmune antiserum against M. avium subsp.avium proteins in order to remove cross-reacting antigens. This absorbed-antigen ELISA recognized 66% of animals with paratuberculosis (37 of 56), while none of the animals with naturally occurring bovine tuberculosis (TB) had detectable antibodies. However, the animals with experimental bovine TB also responded in this ELISA. Similar results were found in a commercial ELISA, showing that neither of these tests was able to distinguish between paratuberculosis and bovine TB. The sera were further tested for antibody activities against purified AhpC and AhpD, which are proteins constitutively expressed byM. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, and against a secreted 14-kDa protein present in culture filtrates from theM. avium complex. Elevated antibody levels to AhpC, AhpD, and the 14-kDa antigen were found in 27% (13 of 48), 15% (7 of 48), and 27% (13 of 48), respectively, of the cattle with paratuberculosis. Together these ELISAs were positive with 35% (17 of 48) of the animals. None of the animals with bovine TB had detectable antibodies against any of the purified proteins despite their high levels of cross-reacting antibodies. These results show that purified specific antigens are needed to differentiate between paratuberculosis and bovine TB in ELISA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AhpC、AhpD和禽分枝杆菌14千道尔顿分泌抗原。在酶联免疫吸附试验中区分副结核和牛结核
自然感染禽分枝杆菌亚种的牛血清。对56例副结核患者(n = 56)、自然感染(n = 4)和实验感染(n = 8)的牛分枝杆菌患者进行了副结核抗原抗体检测。建立了一种酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)。鸟结核无性系种群。禽分枝杆菌亚种的超免疫抗血清上副结核抗原。以去除交叉反应的抗原。这种吸收抗原ELISA法识别出66%的副结核动物(56只中的37只),而患有自然发生的牛结核病(TB)的动物中没有可检测到的抗体。然而,实验牛结核动物在ELISA中也有应答。在一种商业化的酶联免疫吸附试验中也发现了类似的结果,表明这两种试验都不能区分副结核病和牛结核病。进一步检测血清对纯化AhpC和AhpD的抗体活性,这两种蛋白是由m组成表达的。鸟结核无性系种群。副结核菌病,并抵抗来自他们的培养滤液中分泌的14kda蛋白。鸟结核复杂。在48例副结核病牛中,分别有27%(13例)、15%(7例)和27%(13例)的AhpC、AhpD和14-kDa抗原抗体水平升高。48只动物中有17只(35%)的elisa阳性。患有牛结核病的动物中没有检测到针对任何纯化蛋白的抗体,尽管它们的交叉反应抗体水平很高。这些结果表明,在ELISA中需要纯化的特异性抗原来区分副结核和牛结核。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunoglobulin G1 Antibody Response toHelicobacter pylori Heat Shock Protein 60 Is Closely Associated with Low-Grade Gastric Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Antibodies against Streptococcus agalactiae Proteins cα and R4 in Sera from Pregnant Women from Norway and Zimbabwe Cystatin Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Serodiagnosis of Human Clonorchiasis and Profile of Captured Antigenic Protein of Clonorchis sinensis Recognition of Multiple Classes of Hepatitis C Antibodies Increases Detection Sensitivity in Oral Fluid Circulating Inflammatory Mediators in Patients with Fever: Predicting Bloodstream Infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1