Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Using Urban Patterns to Map the Agricultural Systems

Gianni Guastella, Stefano Pareglio
{"title":"Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Using Urban Patterns to Map the Agricultural Systems","authors":"Gianni Guastella,&nbsp;Stefano Pareglio","doi":"10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rural territories cover 91% of EU27 area and 56% of population live in there. Common Agricultural Policy pays more and more attention to these territories, in particular to their development. In this work it is argued that a generic agricultural and/or socio-economic characterization might be not sufficient to understand these territories, to formulate appropriate policies and ultimately to evaluate the effectiveness of such policy measures. In our view, the “agricultural” character is closely related to the farmland natural attributes as well as to the specific farming activities while the “rural” character is more related to the functional relationships with the urban areas. Hence, a methodology is discussed to classify a geographical space based on a simple measure of urbanization and to provide a classification that considers multiple degrees of urbanization and/or rurality. The method is applied to municipality data for the Lombardy region to distinguish network-based urban systems from mono-centric cities and to classify “non-urban” territories accordingly, separating rural from peri-urban areas. Statistical tests are conducted to study the extent to which the different typologies of territories identified differ with respect to a set of agricultural characteristics. Substantial differences in agriculture are highlighted between urban and rural areas as well as among “non-urban” areas, suggesting that more rigorous definitions of rural can best used to program policies for sustainable local development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100063,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.012","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210784316300122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Rural territories cover 91% of EU27 area and 56% of population live in there. Common Agricultural Policy pays more and more attention to these territories, in particular to their development. In this work it is argued that a generic agricultural and/or socio-economic characterization might be not sufficient to understand these territories, to formulate appropriate policies and ultimately to evaluate the effectiveness of such policy measures. In our view, the “agricultural” character is closely related to the farmland natural attributes as well as to the specific farming activities while the “rural” character is more related to the functional relationships with the urban areas. Hence, a methodology is discussed to classify a geographical space based on a simple measure of urbanization and to provide a classification that considers multiple degrees of urbanization and/or rurality. The method is applied to municipality data for the Lombardy region to distinguish network-based urban systems from mono-centric cities and to classify “non-urban” territories accordingly, separating rural from peri-urban areas. Statistical tests are conducted to study the extent to which the different typologies of territories identified differ with respect to a set of agricultural characteristics. Substantial differences in agriculture are highlighted between urban and rural areas as well as among “non-urban” areas, suggesting that more rigorous definitions of rural can best used to program policies for sustainable local development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村地区的可持续发展:利用城市模式绘制农业系统图
农村地区覆盖了欧盟27国91%的面积,56%的人口居住在那里。共同农业政策越来越关注这些地区,特别是它们的发展。在这项工作中,有人认为,一般的农业和/或社会经济特征可能不足以了解这些领土,制定适当的政策,并最终评价这些政策措施的有效性。我们认为,“农业”特征与农田的自然属性以及具体的农耕活动密切相关,而“农村”特征则与城市的功能关系密切相关。因此,本文讨论了一种基于城市化的简单度量对地理空间进行分类的方法,并提供了一种考虑多种程度的城市化和/或乡村性的分类。该方法应用于伦巴第地区的市政数据,以区分基于网络的城市系统与单中心城市,并相应地对“非城市”领土进行分类,将农村与城郊地区分开。进行了统计测试,以研究所确定的不同类型的领土在一套农业特征方面的差异程度。报告强调了城市和农村地区以及“非城市”地区在农业方面的巨大差异,这表明更严格的农村定义最适合用于规划地方可持续发展的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How the Nexus of Water/Food/Energy can be Seen with the Perspective of People well being and the Italian BES Framework Non Solo Cibo, Not Just Food: Which Compatibility between Consumers’ Ethical and Social Preoccupations and Trade and Commercial Law? Developing a Rating Model for Selection Solar Wood Drying Location A Preliminary Study on a New Approach to Estimate Water Resource Allocation: The Net Water Footprint Applied to Animal Products Grain Yield and Yield Components at Triticale under Different Technological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1