{"title":"Counter-Hegemonic Strategy from the Global South: A Pluri-scalar War of Position","authors":"Thomas Muhr","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2021.1994295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the context of the crisis of capitalist world order (Gills 2020), a resurgent interest in the historical question of strategy in/for progressive transformation against the accumulated power of global capital spans the social sciences and activist camps. Except for human geographers (e.g. Castree, Featherstone and Herod 2008; Sparke 2008), however, neglected in these discussions is the role of socio-spatial theory in engendering structural transformation within the constraints of the prevailing historical structure. To this end, this article integrates neo-Gramscian with human geography theory and method in elaborating the notion of “pluri-scalar war of position”, incipiently defined as “multidimensional struggle over minds and strategic places at and across different interlocking scales simultaneously in the construction of a historic bloc” (Muhr 2013a: 7). The concept evolved from research into the emergent spatiality of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA-TCP)/Petrocaribe between 2005 and 2012. Starting from a place-based community in Venezuela and extending into distinct though increasingly interconnecting places in other countries (Nicaragua, El Salvador, Brazil), I argued that a pluri-scalar war of position was mobilised as a propositive, or pro-active, state-led socio-spatial strategy during Hugo Chávez’s hemispheric leadership, driving the production of a global","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"27 1","pages":"214 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.1994295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Within the context of the crisis of capitalist world order (Gills 2020), a resurgent interest in the historical question of strategy in/for progressive transformation against the accumulated power of global capital spans the social sciences and activist camps. Except for human geographers (e.g. Castree, Featherstone and Herod 2008; Sparke 2008), however, neglected in these discussions is the role of socio-spatial theory in engendering structural transformation within the constraints of the prevailing historical structure. To this end, this article integrates neo-Gramscian with human geography theory and method in elaborating the notion of “pluri-scalar war of position”, incipiently defined as “multidimensional struggle over minds and strategic places at and across different interlocking scales simultaneously in the construction of a historic bloc” (Muhr 2013a: 7). The concept evolved from research into the emergent spatiality of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA-TCP)/Petrocaribe between 2005 and 2012. Starting from a place-based community in Venezuela and extending into distinct though increasingly interconnecting places in other countries (Nicaragua, El Salvador, Brazil), I argued that a pluri-scalar war of position was mobilised as a propositive, or pro-active, state-led socio-spatial strategy during Hugo Chávez’s hemispheric leadership, driving the production of a global
期刊介绍:
Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.