Treatment of Adults with Idiopathic Recurrent Pericarditis: Novel Use of Immunotherapy

N. Schwier, G. Hale, Marie L. Davies
{"title":"Treatment of Adults with Idiopathic Recurrent Pericarditis: Novel Use of Immunotherapy","authors":"N. Schwier, G. Hale, Marie L. Davies","doi":"10.1002/phar.1897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) can be challenging to treat. Even after guideline‐directed first‐line treatment consisting of aspirin (ASA) or a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) in combination with colchicine therapy, recurrences still occur in greater than 20% of patients. Many patients then require treatment with long‐term corticosteroids, which is not a favorable option due to their short‐ and long‐term adverse effects. Because it is theorized that the pathophysiology of IRP may possess autoimmune sequelae, the use of immunotherapy for the treatment of IRP has emerged. In this review, we describe the literature associated with immunotherapy used to treat IRP in an adult population as well as provide an overview of the safety and monitoring parameters for each agent. The most common immunotherapies used after patients have had multiple recurrences of IRP are anakinra, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and azathioprine. In most cases, these immunotherapies are adjunctive therapy, with the goal of tapering and discontinuing immunosuppressive corticosteroids. After reviewing the data, anakinra resulted in more patients discontinuing corticosteroids and prevented further recurrences of pericarditis. IVIG resulted in symptom resolution and no further recurrences in most of the patients. Azathioprine was associated with more than half of patients becoming recurrence free; however, many patients required a restart of corticosteroids due to recurrence. Clinicians should be aware of the adverse effects of immunotherapy, ranging from mild gastrointestinal events to risk of infection and serious blood dyscrasias that may require diligent monitoring. The use of immunotherapy for the treatment of adults with IRP should be restricted to patients who have multiple recurrences. Ideally, immunotherapy would be adjunctive to first‐line combination therapy with ASA/NSAID plus colchicine, with the goal of tapering and discontinuing immunosuppressive corticosteroids. Furthermore, clinicians should consider cost, drug‐drug and drug‐disease interactions, and safety, as well as the quality of the retrospective evidence before considering any immunotherapy.","PeriodicalId":19812,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) can be challenging to treat. Even after guideline‐directed first‐line treatment consisting of aspirin (ASA) or a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) in combination with colchicine therapy, recurrences still occur in greater than 20% of patients. Many patients then require treatment with long‐term corticosteroids, which is not a favorable option due to their short‐ and long‐term adverse effects. Because it is theorized that the pathophysiology of IRP may possess autoimmune sequelae, the use of immunotherapy for the treatment of IRP has emerged. In this review, we describe the literature associated with immunotherapy used to treat IRP in an adult population as well as provide an overview of the safety and monitoring parameters for each agent. The most common immunotherapies used after patients have had multiple recurrences of IRP are anakinra, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and azathioprine. In most cases, these immunotherapies are adjunctive therapy, with the goal of tapering and discontinuing immunosuppressive corticosteroids. After reviewing the data, anakinra resulted in more patients discontinuing corticosteroids and prevented further recurrences of pericarditis. IVIG resulted in symptom resolution and no further recurrences in most of the patients. Azathioprine was associated with more than half of patients becoming recurrence free; however, many patients required a restart of corticosteroids due to recurrence. Clinicians should be aware of the adverse effects of immunotherapy, ranging from mild gastrointestinal events to risk of infection and serious blood dyscrasias that may require diligent monitoring. The use of immunotherapy for the treatment of adults with IRP should be restricted to patients who have multiple recurrences. Ideally, immunotherapy would be adjunctive to first‐line combination therapy with ASA/NSAID plus colchicine, with the goal of tapering and discontinuing immunosuppressive corticosteroids. Furthermore, clinicians should consider cost, drug‐drug and drug‐disease interactions, and safety, as well as the quality of the retrospective evidence before considering any immunotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人特发性复发性心包炎的治疗:免疫疗法的新应用
特发性复发性心包炎(IRP)的治疗具有挑战性。即使在指南指导的一线治疗包括阿司匹林(ASA)或非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)联合秋水仙碱治疗后,仍有超过20%的患者复发。许多患者因此需要长期使用皮质类固醇治疗,由于其短期和长期的不良反应,这不是一个有利的选择。由于理论上认为IRP的病理生理可能具有自身免疫性后遗症,因此出现了使用免疫疗法治疗IRP的情况。在这篇综述中,我们描述了与用于治疗成人IRP的免疫疗法相关的文献,并概述了每种药物的安全性和监测参数。IRP多次复发后最常用的免疫疗法是阿那白,静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)和硫唑嘌呤。在大多数情况下,这些免疫疗法是辅助治疗,目的是逐渐减少和停止使用免疫抑制皮质类固醇。在回顾了这些数据后,阿那金导致更多的患者停止使用皮质类固醇,并防止心包炎的进一步复发。在大多数患者中,IVIG导致症状缓解且没有进一步复发。硫唑嘌呤与超过一半的患者无复发相关;然而,由于复发,许多患者需要重新使用皮质类固醇。临床医生应该意识到免疫治疗的不良反应,从轻微的胃肠道事件到感染的风险和可能需要认真监测的严重血液异常。成人IRP的免疫治疗应仅限于多次复发的患者。理想情况下,免疫治疗应辅助于ASA/非甾体抗炎药加秋水仙碱的一线联合治疗,目的是逐渐减少和停止使用免疫抑制皮质类固醇。此外,在考虑任何免疫疗法之前,临床医生应该考虑成本、药物-药物和药物-疾病的相互作用、安全性以及回顾性证据的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of cefiderocol for off-label treatment indications: A systematic review. Poor tolerability of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy in lung transplant recipients Reduced risk of NSAID‐Induced adverse events with concomitant use of misoprostol (MICRO study) Evaluating adherence to concomitant diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia treatments and intermediate outcomes among elderly patients using marginal structural modeling Association between glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and biliary‐related diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1