Pay Transparency, Information Access Rights and Data Protection Law: Exploring Viable Alternatives to Disclosure Orders in Equal Pay Litigation

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Industrial Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.1093/indlaw/dwac028
Victoria E. Hooton, Henry Pearce
{"title":"Pay Transparency, Information Access Rights and Data Protection Law: Exploring Viable Alternatives to Disclosure Orders in Equal Pay Litigation","authors":"Victoria E. Hooton, Henry Pearce","doi":"10.1093/indlaw/dwac028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Equal pay litigation is often highly technical, with a drawn out and costly legal battle for claimants. This is somewhat because of the way equal pay law is constructed, as the requirement to have specific, named comparators can be an area of intense dispute. The complexity and length of cases look set to increase as the parameters of equal pay for work of equal value are explored, and occupational segregation is challenged in the employment tribunals and courts. This article considers one of the largest obstacles to quick and efficient equal pay litigation: the imbalance of access to information between employer and employee. The difficulties of applications for disclosure orders are discussed, alongside pay transparency measures and the recent proposals for a right to direct access to a suspected comparator’s pay data. We consider whether the proposed right is a viable, swifter route to information parity and greater efficiency in equal pay litigation, in light of the experience of freedom of information requests regarding equal pay. Specifically, we note the tension that may arise between the ‘Right to Know’ a comparator’s pay, and the data protection obligations of the employer.","PeriodicalId":45482,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Law Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Equal pay litigation is often highly technical, with a drawn out and costly legal battle for claimants. This is somewhat because of the way equal pay law is constructed, as the requirement to have specific, named comparators can be an area of intense dispute. The complexity and length of cases look set to increase as the parameters of equal pay for work of equal value are explored, and occupational segregation is challenged in the employment tribunals and courts. This article considers one of the largest obstacles to quick and efficient equal pay litigation: the imbalance of access to information between employer and employee. The difficulties of applications for disclosure orders are discussed, alongside pay transparency measures and the recent proposals for a right to direct access to a suspected comparator’s pay data. We consider whether the proposed right is a viable, swifter route to information parity and greater efficiency in equal pay litigation, in light of the experience of freedom of information requests regarding equal pay. Specifically, we note the tension that may arise between the ‘Right to Know’ a comparator’s pay, and the data protection obligations of the employer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
薪酬透明度、信息访问权和数据保护法:探索同工同酬诉讼中披露令的可行替代方案
同工同酬诉讼通常是高度技术性的,对原告来说是一场旷日持久、代价高昂的法律战。这在某种程度上是因为同工同酬法的构建方式,因为要求有具体的、命名的比较国可能是一个激烈争议的领域。随着对同工同酬的探讨,以及职业隔离在就业法庭和法院受到挑战,案件的复杂性和长度似乎会增加。本文考虑了快速有效的同工同酬诉讼的最大障碍之一:雇主和雇员之间获取信息的不平衡。讨论了申请披露令的困难,以及薪酬透明度措施和最近关于有权直接查阅可疑比较国薪酬数据的建议。根据有关同工同酬的信息自由要求的经验,我们考虑拟议的权利是否可行,更快捷地实现信息平等,并在同工同酬诉讼中提高效率。具体来说,我们注意到比较员薪酬的“知情权”与雇主的数据保护义务之间可能出现的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Industrial Law Journal is established as the leading periodical in its field, providing comment and in-depth analysis on a wide range of topics relating to employment law. It is essential reading for practising lawyers, academics, and lay industrial relations experts to keep abreast of newly enacted legislation and proposals for law reform. In addition Industrial Law Journal carries commentary on relevant government publications and reviews of books relating to labour law.
期刊最新文献
Less or More Labour Law for Social Change? Procurement and the ‘London Living Wage’: Boohene v Royal Parks Ltd Domino Dancing: Mutuality of Obligation and Determining Employment Status in Ireland The Problems and Paradoxes with the EU’s Regulation of Traineeships: A Way Forward ‘Fire and Rehire’: Four Lessons from Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1