Evaluating the Influence of Mood and Stress on Glycemic Variability in People with T1DM Using Glucose Monitoring Sensors and Pools

IF 2.4 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetology Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.3390/diabetology3020018
J. M. Velasco, Marta Botella-Serrano, A. Sánchez-Sánchez, Aranzazu Aramendi, R. Martínez, E. Maqueda, O. Garnica, Sergio Contador, J. Lanchares, J. Hidalgo
{"title":"Evaluating the Influence of Mood and Stress on Glycemic Variability in People with T1DM Using Glucose Monitoring Sensors and Pools","authors":"J. M. Velasco, Marta Botella-Serrano, A. Sánchez-Sánchez, Aranzazu Aramendi, R. Martínez, E. Maqueda, O. Garnica, Sergio Contador, J. Lanchares, J. Hidalgo","doi":"10.3390/diabetology3020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Assess in a sample of people with type 1 diabetes mellitus whether mood and stress influence blood glucose levels and variability. Material and Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring was performed on 10 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, where interstitial glucose values were recorded every 15 min. A daily survey was conducted through Google Forms, collecting information on mood and stress. The day was divided into six slots of 4-h each, asking the patient to assess each slot in relation to mood (sad, normal or happy) and stress (calm, normal or nervous). Different measures of glycemic control (arithmetic mean and percentage of time below/above the target range) and variability (standard deviation, percentage coefficient of variation, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and mean of daily differences) were calculated to relate the mood and stress perceived by patients with blood glucose levels and glycemic variability. A hypothesis test was carried out to quantitatively compare the data groups of the different measures using the Student’s t-test. Results: Statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) were found between different levels of stress. In general, average glucose and variability decrease when the patient is calm. There are statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) between different levels of mood. Variability increases when the mood changes from sad to happy. However, the patient’s average glucose decreases as the mood improves. Conclusions: Variations in mood and stress significantly influence blood glucose levels, and glycemic variability in the patients analyzed with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, they are factors to consider for improving glycemic control. The mean of daily differences does not seem to be a good indicator for variability.","PeriodicalId":72798,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology3020018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assess in a sample of people with type 1 diabetes mellitus whether mood and stress influence blood glucose levels and variability. Material and Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring was performed on 10 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, where interstitial glucose values were recorded every 15 min. A daily survey was conducted through Google Forms, collecting information on mood and stress. The day was divided into six slots of 4-h each, asking the patient to assess each slot in relation to mood (sad, normal or happy) and stress (calm, normal or nervous). Different measures of glycemic control (arithmetic mean and percentage of time below/above the target range) and variability (standard deviation, percentage coefficient of variation, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and mean of daily differences) were calculated to relate the mood and stress perceived by patients with blood glucose levels and glycemic variability. A hypothesis test was carried out to quantitatively compare the data groups of the different measures using the Student’s t-test. Results: Statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) were found between different levels of stress. In general, average glucose and variability decrease when the patient is calm. There are statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.05) between different levels of mood. Variability increases when the mood changes from sad to happy. However, the patient’s average glucose decreases as the mood improves. Conclusions: Variations in mood and stress significantly influence blood glucose levels, and glycemic variability in the patients analyzed with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, they are factors to consider for improving glycemic control. The mean of daily differences does not seem to be a good indicator for variability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用血糖监测传感器和血糖池评估情绪和应激对T1DM患者血糖变异性的影响
目的:评估1型糖尿病患者的情绪和压力是否影响血糖水平和变异性。材料与方法:对10例1型糖尿病患者进行连续血糖监测,每15分钟记录一次间质血糖值。每天通过Google Forms进行问卷调查,收集情绪和压力信息。这一天被分成6个时段,每个时段4小时,要求患者评估每个时段与情绪(悲伤、正常或快乐)和压力(平静、正常或紧张)的关系。计算血糖控制的不同测量值(算术平均值和低于/高于目标范围的时间百分比)和变异性(标准差、变异系数百分比、血糖偏离的平均幅度和每日差异的平均值),以将患者感知到的情绪和压力与血糖水平和血糖变异性联系起来。使用学生t检验进行假设检验以定量比较不同测量的数据组。结果:不同应激水平间差异有统计学意义(p值< 0.05)。一般来说,当病人平静时,平均血糖和变异性会降低。不同情绪水平间差异有统计学意义(p值< 0.05)。当情绪从悲伤变为快乐时,变异性就会增加。然而,患者的平均血糖会随着情绪的改善而降低。结论:情绪和应激的变化显著影响1型糖尿病患者的血糖水平和血糖变异性。因此,它们是改善血糖控制的考虑因素。日差的平均值似乎并不是可变性的良好指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved Diabetic Foot Ulcer Outcomes in Medicaid Beneficiaries with Podiatric Care Access. Outcomes for Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Following Transition from Medicaid to Commercial Insurance. Does the Efficacy of Semaglutide Treatment Differ between Low-Risk and High-Risk Subgroups of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity Based on SCORE2, SCORE2-Diabetes, and ASCVD Calculations? Diet Supplementation with Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) Leaf Powder Exhibits an Antidiabetic Property in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Male Wistar Rats A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for the Detection of Undiagnosed Diabetes Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1